Tumour marker measurements in the diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer.

Elevation of established blood tumour markers correlates with the stage of breast cancer. The major role of current blood markers is therefore in the diagnosis and monitoring of metastatic disease. A combination of markers is better than a single marker with the most widely adopted combination being CEA and one MUC1 mucin, commonly detected as either CA15.3 or CA27.29. Tumour marker measurement is now used as a complementary test in the diagnosis of symptomatic metastases. In the monitoring of therapeutic response to both endocrine and cytotoxic therapies in advanced disease, biochemical assessment using blood markers not only correlates with conventional UICC criteria but has a lot of advantages which make it a potentially superior way of assessment. In this regard, CA15.3, CEA and ESR are the best validated combination. Studies are ongoing to evaluate the use of sequential blood tumour marker measurements in the follow-up of patients after treatment for their primary breast cancer, in terms of both early detection and early therapeutic intervention. Further randomized studies are also required to ascertain that marker-directed therapy is superior to the current practice for metastatic disease. In line with clinical studies, intensive laboratory work is being carried out to optimize the use of blood markers in advanced disease as well as to exploit their use in screening and diagnosis of early primary breast cancer.

[1]  M. Duffy,et al.  The clinical value of CEA and CA 15-3 in breast cancer management , 1995, The International journal of biological markers.

[2]  V. Go,et al.  The role of tumor markers in the management of colorectal cancer. , 1982, Cancer.

[3]  A. Howell,et al.  Objective measurement of therapeutic response in breast cancer using tumour markers. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  N. Dalay,et al.  Utility of CA 15-3 and CEA in monitoring breast cancer patients with bone metastases: special emphasis on "spiking" phenomena. , 1997, Clinical biochemistry.

[5]  A. Nicolini,et al.  Evaluation of serum CA15-3 determination with CEA and TPA in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  F. Pannuti,et al.  CEA, MCA, CA 15.3 and CA 549 and their combinations in expressing and monitoring metastatic breast cancer: a prospective comparative study. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[8]  E. Röttinger,et al.  The value of the tumor marker CA 15‐3 in diagnosing and monitoring breast cancer. A comparative study with carcinoembryonic antigen , 1991, Cancer.

[9]  J. Robertson,et al.  Evaluation of the IMMULITE BR-MA and CEA assays and comparison with immunoradiometric assays for CA15-3 and CEA in breast cancer. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[10]  R. Tähtelä,et al.  Serum concentrations of type I collagen carboxyterminal telopeptide (ICTP) and type I procollagen carboxy-and aminoterminal propeptides (PICP, PINP) as markers of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer. , 1996, Anticancer research.

[11]  F Pozza,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  R. Blamey,et al.  Potential for cost economies in guiding therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  S. Krämer,et al.  Breast cancer and clinical utility of CA 15-3 and CEA. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[14]  R. Blamey,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA): its role as a tumour marker in breast cancer. , 1981, Clinics in oncology.

[15]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  A. Evans,et al.  Imaging of metastatic breast cancer: distribution and radiological assessment at presentation. , 2001, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[17]  C. Blomqvist,et al.  The response evaluation of bone metastases in mammary carcinoma. The value of radiology, scintigraphy, and biochemical markers of bone metabolism , 1987, Cancer.

[18]  A. Nicolini,et al.  Prolonged survival by 'early' salvage treatment of breast cancer patients: a retrospective 6-year study. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  H. Wallenburg,et al.  LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN PREVENTS PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION AND PRE-ECLAMPSIA IN ANGIOTENSIN-SENSITIVE PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1986, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Ali,et al.  Serum CA-15.3 and CEA patterns in postsurgical follow-up, and in monitoring clinical course of metastatic cancer in patients with breast carcinoma. , 1993, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  K. Possinger,et al.  C-erbB-2 in Serum of Patients Receiving Fractionated Paclitaxel Chemotherapy , 1999, The International journal of biological markers.

[22]  M. Fukunaga,et al.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a preliminary report. , 1999, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[23]  H. Grimes,et al.  CA15-3: a reliable indicator of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer patients. , 1992, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[24]  J. Robertson Prospective confirmation of a biochemical index for measuring therapeutic efficacy in metastatic breast cancer in a multicentre study , 1996 .

[25]  H. Sikorska,et al.  Clinical applications of carcinoembryonic antigen. , 1988, Cancer detection and prevention.

[26]  Y. Lee Serial tests of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with breast cancer , 1983, American journal of clinical oncology.

[27]  M. Williams,et al.  An objective biochemical assessment of therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer: a study with external review of clinical data. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  C. Blomqvist,et al.  Markers of type I collagen degradation and synthesis in the monitoring of treatment response in bone metastases from breast carcinoma. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  J. Wojtacki,et al.  [Usefulness of CA 15-3 antigen determination for evaluation of response to second-line chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: preliminary study]. , 1997, Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej.

[30]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Serial plasma carcinoembryonic antigen measurements during treatment of metastatic breast cancer. , 1983, JAMA.

[31]  F. Jamar,et al.  Granulocyte margination in bone marrow: comparison with margination in the spleen and liver. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[32]  G. Hör,et al.  Immunodiagnosis of Tumours , 1993 .

[33]  S. Ménard,et al.  C-erbB-2 Expression in Primary Breast Cancer , 1999, The International journal of biological markers.

[34]  V. Zurawski,et al.  Comparison of circulating CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with breast cancer. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  J. Taylor‐Papadimitriou,et al.  Reactions of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Membranes of Human Milkfat Globules with Uterine and Cervical Epithelia During Proliferative and Secretory Stages , 1985 .

[36]  Magennis Dp Angiogenesis: a new prognostic marker for breast cancer. , 1998 .

[37]  M. Indelli,et al.  Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. , 1994, JAMA.

[38]  A. Howell,et al.  Assessment of four monoclonal antibodies as serum markers in breast cancer. , 1990, European journal of cancer.

[39]  I. Tomlinson,et al.  Tumour marker CA15-3: possible uses in the routine management of breast cancer. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[40]  H. Rauschecker,et al.  Clinical significance of circulating immune complexes in patients with metastatic breast cancer , 1983, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[41]  R. Rubens,et al.  Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  R. Gelman,et al.  Comparison of CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring the clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1988, Cancer research.

[43]  H. Stettner,et al.  The predictive value of a combination of tumor markers in monitoring patients with ovarian cancer , 1987, Cancer.

[44]  R. Poisson,et al.  Biologic markers and breast cancer: A multiparametric study—1. Increased serum protein levels , 1982, Cancer.

[45]  N. Zamcheck,et al.  Sequential carcinoembryonic antigen levels in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer: a predictor and monitor of response and relapse. , 1978, Annals of internal medicine.

[46]  D. Pons-Anicet,et al.  Value of CA 15:3 in the follow-up of breast cancer patients. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[47]  D. Fagret,et al.  Can tumour marker assays be a guide in the prescription of bone scan for breast and lung cancers? , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[48]  J. Robertson,et al.  C-erbB-2 in Serum of Patients with Breast Cancer , 1999, The International journal of biological markers.

[49]  A. V. Dalen TPS in breast cancer--a comparative study with carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15-3. , 1992 .

[50]  M. Kerin,et al.  A prospective evaluation of CA15-3 in stage I carcinoma of the breast. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[51]  R. Blamey,et al.  Continuous chemotherapy in responsive metastatic breast cancer: a role for tumour markers? , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[52]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive vs Clinical Follow-up After Treatmentof Primary Breast Cancer: 10-Year Updateof a Randomized Trial , 1999 .

[53]  J. Wu,et al.  Apoptosis and angiogenesis: two promising tumor markers in breast cancer (review). , 1996, Anticancer research.

[54]  Á. Ruibal,et al.  Circulating tumor marker levels in advanced breast carcinoma correlate with the extent of metastatic disease , 1989, Cancer.

[55]  A. V. Dalen New markers for breast carcinoma-associated antigen in comparison with CA 15-3. , 1996 .

[56]  S. Cerutti,et al.  Differential patterns of bone turnover in relation to bone pain and disease extent in bone in cancer patients with skeletal metastases. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[57]  R. Molina,et al.  Utility of C-erbB-2 in tissue and in serum in the early diagnosis of recurrence in breast cancer patients: comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15.3. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[58]  M. Williams,et al.  The use of serum carcinoembryonic antigen to assess therapeutic response in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study with external review. , 1988, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[59]  M. Plebani,et al.  New and traditional serum markers of bone metabolism in the detection of skeletal metastases. , 1996, Clinical biochemistry.

[60]  S. Wells,et al.  Evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen as a plasma monitor for human breast carcinoma , 1978, Cancer.

[61]  R. Einarsson TPS--a cytokeratin marker for therapy control in breast cancer. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[62]  R. Molina,et al.  Use of blood tumour markers in the detection of recurrent breast cancer , 1998 .

[63]  M. Gion,et al.  The tumour associated antigen CA15.3 in primary breast cancer. Evaluation of 667 cases. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[64]  D. Hayes,et al.  Use of a murine monoclonal antibody for detection of circulating plasma DF3 antigen levels in breast cancer patients. , 1985, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[65]  J. Geraghty,et al.  CA 15‐3 in patients with locoregional and metastatic breast carcinoma , 1992, Cancer.

[66]  R. Blamey,et al.  Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) in breast cancer patients: comparison with CA 15.3 and CEA. , 1995, Anticancer research.

[67]  M. Price High molecular weight epithelial mucins as markers in breast cancer. , 1988, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[68]  M. Kerin,et al.  An evaluation of preoperative CA 15-3 measurement in primary breast carcinoma. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[69]  R. Blamey,et al.  Serological monitoring of advanced breast cancer treated by systemic cytotoxic using a combination of ESR, CEA, and CA 15.3: fact or fiction? , 1991, Disease markers.

[70]  C. Sturgeon,et al.  Treatment response in metastatic breast cancer. A multicentre study comparing UICC criteria and tumour marker changes , 1996 .

[71]  J E Husband,et al.  T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer vertebral metastases: changes on treatment and correlation with response to therapy. , 1998, Clinical radiology.

[72]  J. Robertson,et al.  MUC-1 mucin assays for monitoring therapy in metastatic breast cancer , 1998 .

[73]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive Diagnostic Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial , 1994 .

[74]  T. Powles,et al.  Screening for metastases in breast cancer: An assessment of biochemical and physical methods , 1981, Cancer.

[75]  B. Cantwell,et al.  Evaluation of follow-up methods to detect relapse after mastectomy in breast cancer patients , 1982, Irish journal of medical science.

[76]  M. Gion Serum markers in breast cancer management , 1992 .