The effect of different number of diffusion gradients on SNR of diffusion tensor-derived measurement maps

th , 2008; revised Feb. 12 th , 2009; accepted Feb. 16 th , 2009 ABSTRACT Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is mainly applied to white matter fiber tracking in human brain, but there is still a debate on how many diffusion gradient directions should be used to get the best results. In this paper, the performance of 7 protocols corresponding to 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, 25, and 30 noncollinear number of diffusion gradi- ent directions (NDGD) were discussed by com- paring signal-noise ratio (SNR) of tensor- de- rived measurement maps and fractional ani- sotropy (FA) values. All DTI data (eight healthy volunteers) were downloaded from the website of Johns Hopkins Medical Institute Laboratory of Brain Anatomi- cal MRI with permission. FA, apparent diffusion constant mean (ADC-mean), the largest eigen- value (LEV), and eigenvector orientation (EVO) maps associated with LEV of all subjects were calculated derived from tensor in the 7 proto- cols via DTI Studio. A method to estimate the variance was presented to calculate SNR of these tensor-derived maps. Mean ± standard deviation of the SNR and FA values within re- gion of interest (ROI) selected in the white mat- ter were compared among the 7 protocols. The SNR were improved significantly with NDGD increasing from 6 to 20 (P 0.05). There were no significant variances in FA val- ues within ROI between any two protocols (P> 0.05). The SNR could be improved with NDGD in- creasing, but an optimum protocol is needed because of clinical limitations.

[1]  Sinisa Pajevic,et al.  Color schemes to represent the orientation of anisotropic tissues from diffusion tensor data: Application to white matter fiber tract mapping in the human brain , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[3]  M. I. Smith,et al.  A study of rotationally invariant and symmetric indices of diffusion anisotropy. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  J M Taveras,et al.  Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[5]  Yunmei Chen,et al.  DT-MRI denoising and neuronal fiber tracking , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study † , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  S Skare,et al.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  N. Papadakis,et al.  Minimal gradient encoding for robust estimation of diffusion anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Xiaohong Joe Zhou,et al.  Analytical error propagation in diffusion anisotropy calculations , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Lawrence H. Staib,et al.  White matter tractography by anisotropic wavefront evolution and diffusion tensor imaging , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  S Ekholm,et al.  Effects of number of diffusion gradient directions on derived diffusion tensor imaging indices in human brain. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. Tuch Q‐ball imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[16]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.