Pupillometry reveals cognitive demands of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in young and older adults

[1]  Kristin J. Van Engen,et al.  Time Stand Still: Effects of Temporal Window Selection on Eye Tracking Analysis , 2020, Collabra. Psychology.

[2]  Drew J. McLaughlin,et al.  Task-evoked pupil response for accurately recognized accented speech. , 2020, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Drew J. McLaughlin,et al.  Rapid adaptation to fully intelligible nonnative-accented speech reduces listening effort , 2019, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Matthew B. Winn,et al.  GazeR: A Package for Processing Gaze Position and Pupil Size Data , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[5]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Modeling pupil responses to rapid sequential events , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[6]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data , 2019, Trends in hearing.

[7]  Jamie Reilly,et al.  The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[8]  Adriana A Zekveld,et al.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[9]  S. Mathôt.  Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[10]  J. Peelle.  Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Chad S. Rogers,et al.  The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences. , 2016, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Federica Scarpina,et al.  The Stroop Color and Word Test , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[13]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Effort Not Speed Characterizes Comprehension of Spoken Sentences by Older Adults with Mild Hearing Impairment , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[14]  Matthew B. Winn.  Pupillary responses signify more than just effort: Windows into processing, prediction, reflection, and uncertainty , 2016 .

[15]  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Matthew B. Winn.  Rapid Release From Listening Effort Resulting From Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[17]  A. Wingfield,et al.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[19]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[20]  M. Gobbe,et al.  The Effects of Age, Refractive Status, and Luminance on Pupil Size , 2016, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Esther Janse,et al.  Speech rate effects on the processing of conversational speech across the adult life span. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Peter Green,et al.  SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation , 2016 .

[23]  Chad S. Rogers,et al.  Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech , 2016, Experimental aging research.

[24]  Frederick L Oswald,et al.  The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[25]  Matthew B. Winn,et al.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[26]  M. Sommers,et al.  Age-related differences in inhibitory control predict audiovisual speech perception. , 2015, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[28]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[29]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[30]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Joshua F. Wiley,et al.  Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R , 2014 .

[32]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Optimally Efficient Neural Systems for Processing Spoken Language , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  L. Humes,et al.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[35]  T. Lunner,et al.  The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[36]  Chad S. Rogers,et al.  Expectation and Entropy in Spoken Word Recognition: Effects of Age and Hearing Acuity , 2013, Experimental aging research.

[37]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[39]  O. Bulut,et al.  Test Review: Shipley-2 Manual , 2012 .

[40]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[41]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Temporal Predictive Codes for Spoken Words in Auditory Cortex , 2012, Current Biology.

[42]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Interaction of Lexical Semantics and Cohort Competition in Spoken Word Recognition: An fMRI Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[44]  Paul Miller,et al.  Effects of degraded sensory input on memory for speech: Behavioral data and a test of biologically constrained computational models , 2010, Brain Research.

[45]  Vanessa Taler,et al.  Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging. , 2010, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[46]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[47]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[48]  D. Isaacowitz,et al.  Positive Gaze Preferences in Older Adults: Assessing the Role of Cognitive Effort with Pupil Dilation , 2010, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[49]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Learning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Albert Costa,et al.  Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity , 2008 .

[51]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[52]  Maarten Casteren,et al.  Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[53]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[54]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[55]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[56]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[57]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  D. Dirks,et al.  Examination of the Neighborhood Activation Theory in Normal and Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[59]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[60]  M. Sommers,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[61]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[62]  E. Szabadi,et al.  Changes in autonomic function with age: a study of pupillary kinetics in healthy young and old people. , 1996, Age and ageing.

[63]  M. Sommers,et al.  The structural organization of the mental lexicon and its contribution to age-related declines in spoken-word recognition. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[64]  L. N. Johnson.  Pupil response. , 1989, The Western journal of medicine.

[65]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.