Bilateral Priming Accelerates Recovery of Upper Limb Function After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Purpose— The ability to live independently after stroke depends on the recovery of upper limb function. We hypothesized that bilateral priming with active–passive movements before upper limb physiotherapy would promote rebalancing of corticomotor excitability and would accelerate upper limb recovery at the subacute stage. Methods— A single-center randomized controlled trial of bilateral priming was conducted with 57 patients randomized at the subacute stage after first-ever ischemic stroke. The PRIMED group made device-assisted mirror symmetrical bimanual movements before upper limb physiotherapy, every weekday for 4 weeks. The CONTROL group was given intermittent cutaneous electric stimulation of the paretic forearm before physiotherapy. Assessments were made at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who reached their plateau for upper limb function at 12 weeks, measured with the Action Research Arm Test. Results— Odds ratios indicated that PRIMED participants were 3× more likely than controls to reach their recovery plateau by 12 weeks. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed a greater proportion of PRIMED participants achieved their plateau by 12 weeks (intention to treat, &khgr;2=4.25; P=0.039 and per protocol, &khgr;2=3.99; P=0.046). ANOVA of per-protocol data showed PRIMED participants had greater rebalancing of corticomotor excitability than controls at 12 and 26 weeks and interhemispheric inhibition at 26 weeks (all P<0.05). Conclusions— Bilateral priming accelerated recovery of upper limb function in the initial weeks after stroke. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ANZCTR1260900046822.

[1]  Robert Chen,et al.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Pathophysiology of Stroke Rehabilitation: The Natural Course of Clinical Recovery, Use-Dependent Plasticity and Rehabilitative Outcome , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[5]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[8]  C. Stinear,et al.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  Alana B. McCambridge,et al.  Mirror Symmetric Bimanual Movement Priming Can Increase Corticomotor Excitability and Enhance Motor Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Paul McNamee,et al.  Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  W. Byblow,et al.  Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  D. Rom A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequality , 1990 .

[13]  T. Matyas,et al.  Responses of the Densely Hemiplegic Upper Extremity to Bilateral Training , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  M. Goosses Bilateral and Unilateral Arm Training Improve Motor Function through Differing Neuroplastic Mechanisms: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011 .

[17]  W. Byblow,et al.  Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting Activities after Stroke: What is Clinically Relevant? , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[19]  W. Byblow,et al.  Rehabilitation is Initiated Early After Stroke, but Most Motor Rehabilitation Trials Are Not: A Systematic Review , 2013, Stroke.

[20]  Charles Capaday,et al.  Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  C. Capaday,et al.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.