Closed-class immanence in sentence production

The closed-class hypothesis asserts that function words play a privileged role in syntactic processes. In language production, the claim is that such words are intrinsic to, identified with, or immanent in phrasal skeletons. Two experiments tested this hypothesis with a syntactic priming procedure. In both, subjects tended to produce utterances in the same syntactic forms as priming sentences, with the structures of the self-generated sentences varying as a function of differences in the structures of the primes. Changes in the closed-class elements of the priming sentences had no effect on this tendency over and above the impact of the structural changes. These results suggest that free-standing closed-class morphemes are not inherent components of the structural frames of English sentences.

[1]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[2]  D. Besner.  Visual word identification: Special-purpose mechanisms for the identification of open and closed class items? , 1988 .

[3]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: Frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence , 1985, Cognition.

[4]  Herman H.J. Kolk,et al.  On Parallelism between Production and Comprehension in Agrammatism , 1985 .

[5]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  A. Ellis.  Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[7]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Hemisphere differences in the recognition of closed and open class words , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  W. Labov,et al.  Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.

[9]  Herman Kolk,et al.  A Theory of Grammatical Impairment in Aphasia , 1987 .

[10]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  A Synthesis of Some Recent Work in Sentence Production , 1989 .

[11]  R. Berndt,et al.  Semantic and syntactic processes in aphasia: a review of the literature. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  D. Bradley,et al.  Computational distinctions of vocabulary type , 1978 .

[13]  A. Friederici.  Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics , 1985, Cognition.

[14]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors , 1990 .

[15]  Steven G Lapointe,et al.  A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics , 1985, Brain and Language.

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The disruption of sentence production: Some dissociations , 1989, Brain and Language.

[17]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Closed- and open-class lexical access in agrammatic and fluent aphasics , 1983, Brain and Language.

[18]  Edgar Zurif,et al.  Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing , 1985, Brain and Language.

[19]  R. Shepard,et al.  Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[21]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[22]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure , 1980 .

[23]  Juan Segui,et al.  The word frequency effect and lexical access , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .

[25]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[26]  A. Friederici.  Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions , 1982, Brain and Language.

[27]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  D. Estival,et al.  Syntactic priming of the passive in English , 1985 .

[29]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity , 1982, Brain and Language.

[30]  Anthony Kroch,et al.  The Isolability of Syntactic Processing , 1989 .

[31]  J. Kimball.  Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language , 1973 .

[32]  Stephanie Kelter,et al.  Surface form and memory in question answering , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.