Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies

Circulating tumor DNA can be used in a variety of clinical and investigational settings across tumor types and stages for screening, diagnosis, and identifying mutations responsible for therapeutic response and drug resistance. Circulating Tumor DNA for Early Detection and Managing Resistance Cancer evolves over time, without any warning signs. Similarly, the development of resistance to therapy generally becomes apparent only when there are obvious signs of tumor growth, at which point the patient may have lost valuable time. Although a repeat biopsy may be able to identify drug-resistant mutations before the tumor has a chance to regrow, it is usually not feasible to do many repeat biopsies. Now, two studies are demonstrating the utility of monitoring the patients’ blood for tumor DNA to detect cancer at the earliest stages of growth or resistance. In one study, Bettegowda and coauthors showed that sampling a patient’s blood may be sufficient to yield information about the tumor’s genetic makeup, even for many early-stage cancers, without a need for an invasive procedure to collect tumor tissue, such as surgery or endoscopy. The authors demonstrated the presence of circulating DNA from many types of tumors that had not yet metastasized or released detectable cells into the circulation. They could detect more than 50% of patients across 14 tumor types at the earliest stages, when these cancers may still be curable, suggesting that a blood draw could be a viable screening approach to detecting most cancers. They also showed that in patients with colorectal cancer, the information derived from circulating tumor DNA could be used to determine the optimal course of treatment and identify resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade. Meanwhile, Misale and colleagues illustrated a way to use this information to overcome treatment resistance. These authors also found that mutations associated with EGFR inhibitor resistance could be detected in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer. In addition, they demonstrated that adding MEK inhibitors, another class of anticancer drugs, can successfully overcome resistance when given in conjunction with the EGFR inhibitors. Thus, the studies from Bettegowda and Misale and their colleagues show the effectiveness of analyzing circulating DNA from a variety of tumors and highlight the potential investigational and clinical applications of this novel technology for early detection, monitoring resistance, and devising treatment plans to overcome resistance. The development of noninvasive methods to detect and monitor tumors continues to be a major challenge in oncology. We used digital polymerase chain reaction–based technologies to evaluate the ability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect tumors in 640 patients with various cancer types. We found that ctDNA was detectable in >75% of patients with advanced pancreatic, ovarian, colorectal, bladder, gastroesophageal, breast, melanoma, hepatocellular, and head and neck cancers, but in less than 50% of primary brain, renal, prostate, or thyroid cancers. In patients with localized tumors, ctDNA was detected in 73, 57, 48, and 50% of patients with colorectal cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast adenocarcinoma, respectively. ctDNA was often present in patients without detectable circulating tumor cells, suggesting that these two biomarkers are distinct entities. In a separate panel of 206 patients with metastatic colorectal cancers, we showed that the sensitivity of ctDNA for detection of clinically relevant KRAS gene mutations was 87.2% and its specificity was 99.2%. Finally, we assessed whether ctDNA could provide clues into the mechanisms underlying resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor blockade in 24 patients who objectively responded to therapy but subsequently relapsed. Twenty-three (96%) of these patients developed one or more mutations in genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Together, these data suggest that ctDNA is a broadly applicable, sensitive, and specific biomarker that can be used for a variety of clinical and research purposes in patients with multiple different types of cancer.

[1]  J Alter,et al.  Progress and Promise , 1919, Nature.

[2]  C. Aring,et al.  A CRITICAL REVIEW , 1939, Journal of neurology and psychiatry.

[3]  R. G. Hoffman,et al.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Shibata,et al.  Most human carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas contain mutant c-K-ras genes , 1988, Cell.

[5]  F. Cleton Evolution of Cancer , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  A Ruibal Morell,et al.  CEA serum levels in non-neoplastic disease. , 1992, The International journal of biological markers.

[7]  A. Weiss,et al.  Detection and characterization of carcinoma cells in the blood. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R Montironi,et al.  Prostate tissue and serum markers. , 2000, Advances in clinical pathology : the official journal of Adriatic Society of Pathology.

[9]  M. Stroun,et al.  About the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNA apoptosis and active DNA release. , 2001, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[10]  M. Duffy,et al.  Clinical Uses of Tumor Markers: A Critical Review , 2001, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[11]  Lori J Sokoll,et al.  Assessment of plasma DNA levels, allelic imbalance, and CA 125 as diagnostic tests for cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  D. Dressman,et al.  Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Ptak,et al.  High Frequency of Mutations of the PIK3CA Gene in Human Cancers , 2004, Science.

[14]  Frank Diehl,et al.  Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Progress and promise , 2005, Urological Research.

[16]  Frank Diehl,et al.  BEAMing up for detection and quantification of rare sequence variants , 2006, Nature Methods.

[17]  M. Fleischhacker,et al.  Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer--a survey. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Serial assessment of human tumor burdens in mice by the analysis of circulating DNA. , 2007, Cancer research.

[19]  Silvia Benvenuti,et al.  Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. , 2007, Cancer research.

[20]  C. Sawyers The cancer biomarker problem , 2008, Nature.

[21]  L. Saltz Biomarkers in colorectal cancer: added value or just added expense? , 2008, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[22]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  S. Goodman,et al.  Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[24]  L. Mazzucchelli,et al.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Core Signaling Pathways in Human Pancreatic Cancers Revealed by Global Genomic Analyses , 2008, Science.

[26]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  L. Diaz,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to confirm somatic KRAS mutations. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  P. Jänne,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of EGFR T790M in Gefitinib or Erlotinib Resistant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  G. Fontanini,et al.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  Francisco M. De La Vega,et al.  Development of Personalized Tumor Biomarkers Using Massively Parallel Sequencing , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[31]  K. Isselbacher,et al.  Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex-generating herringbone-chip , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  Sabine Tejpar,et al.  Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Larissa V Furtado,et al.  Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer , 2011, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[35]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  K. Sikaris,et al.  CA125--a test with a change of heart. , 2011, Heart, lung & circulation.

[37]  M. Stratton Exploring the Genomes of Cancer Cells: Progress and Promise , 2011, Science.

[38]  Yuchen Jiao,et al.  Mutations in CIC and FUBP1 Contribute to Human Oligodendroglioma , 2011, Science.

[39]  U. Ballehaninna,et al.  Serum CA 19-9 as a Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer—A Comprehensive Review , 2011, Indian journal of surgical oncology.

[40]  A. Maitra,et al.  Recurrent GNAS Mutations Define an Unexpected Pathway for Pancreatic Cyst Development , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[41]  Kikuya Kato,et al.  Quantitative Detection of EGFR Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA Derived from Lung Adenocarcinomas , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[42]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Detection of Chromosomal Alterations in the Circulation of Cancer Patients with Whole-Genome Sequencing , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[43]  T. Fehm,et al.  Clinical application of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: overview of the current interventional trials , 2012, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[44]  G. Hampton,et al.  Evaluation of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Association with Clinical Endpoints in a Phase II Clinical Trial of Pertuzumab and Erlotinib , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[45]  F. Bosch,et al.  Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[46]  E. Mardis Genome sequencing and cancer. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[47]  James D Brooks,et al.  Translational genomics: the challenge of developing cancer biomarkers. , 2012, Genome research.

[48]  Peter J. Campbell,et al.  Evolution of the cancer genome , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  K. Pantel,et al.  Circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. , 2012, Annual review of medicine.

[50]  Johannes G. Reiter,et al.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers , 2012, Nature.

[51]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Noninvasive Identification and Monitoring of Cancer Mutations by Targeted Deep Sequencing of Plasma DNA , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[52]  Enzo Medico,et al.  Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer , 2012, Nature.

[53]  N. Rosenfeld,et al.  Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA , 2013, Nature.

[54]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Integrated genomic analyses identify ARID1A and ARID1B alterations in the childhood cancer neuroblastoma , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[55]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA to monitor metastatic breast cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[57]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Massively Parallel Tumor Multigene Sequencing to Evaluate Response to Panitumumab in a Randomized Phase III Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[58]  V. Velculescu,et al.  Insights into therapeutic resistance from whole-genome analyses of circulating tumor DNA , 2013, Oncotarget.

[59]  Gary L. Gallia,et al.  Exomic Sequencing of Four Rare Central Nervous System Tumor Types , 2013, Oncotarget.

[60]  U. Cortes,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations during chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer , 2013, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[61]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[62]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Blockade of EGFR and MEK Intercepts Heterogeneous Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapies in Colorectal Cancer , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.