Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin.

Microtubules (MT), along with a variety of associated motor proteins, are involved in a range of cellular functions including vesicle movement, chromosome segregation, and cell motility. MTs are assemblies of heterodimeric proteins, alpha beta-tubulins, the structure of which has been determined by electron crystallography of zinc-induced, pacilitaxel-stabilized tubulin sheets. These data provide a basis for examining relationships between structural features and protein function. Here, we study the fluctuation dynamics of the tubulin dimer with the aim of elucidating its functional motions relevant to substrate binding, polymerization/depolymerization and MT assembly. A coarse-grained model, harmonically constrained according to the crystal structure, is used to explore the global dynamics of the dimer. Our results identify six regions of collective motion, comprised of structurally close but discontinuous sequence fragments, observed only in the dimeric form, dimerization being a prerequisite for domain identification. Boundaries between regions of collective motions appear to act as linkages, found primarily within secondary-structure elements that lack sequence conservation, but are located at minima in the fluctuation curve, at positions of hydrophobic residues. Residue fluctuations within these domains identify the most mobile regions as loops involved in recognition of the adjacent regions. The least mobile regions are associated with nucleotide binding sites where lethal mutations occur. The functional coupling of motions between and within regions identifies three global motions: torsional and wobbling movements, en bloc, between the alpha- and beta-tubulin monomers, and stretching longitudinally. Further analysis finds the antitumor drug pacilitaxel (TaxotereR) to reduce flexibility in the M loop of the beta-tubulin monomer; an effect that may contribute to tightening lateral interactions between protofilaments assembled into MTs. Our analysis provides insights into relationships between intramolecular tubulin movements of MT organization and function.

[1]  I. Ringel,et al.  Direct photoaffinity labeling of tubulin with taxol. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  A. Thomas,et al.  Analysis of the low frequency normal modes of the T-state of aspartate transcarbamylase. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  A. D. Robertson,et al.  Microsecond to minute dynamics revealed by EX1-type hydrogen exchange at nearly every backbone hydrogen bond in a native protein. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[5]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Identification of kinetically hot residues in proteins , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  E. M. Cooper,et al.  Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast beta-tubulin gene. , 1994, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[8]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin and microtubule structure. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[9]  R. Williams,et al.  End-stabilized microtubules observed in vitro: stability, subunit, interchange, and breakage. , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin and FtsZ form a distinct family of GTPases , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  E. Nogales,et al.  Low resolution structure of microtubules in solution. Synchrotron X-ray scattering and electron microscopy of taxol-induced microtubules assembled from purified tubulin in comparison with glycerol and MAP-induced microtubules. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  P. Flory,et al.  Statistical thermodynamics of random networks , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  N. Go,et al.  Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Linkages between the effects of taxol, colchicine, and GTP on tubulin polymerization. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  D. Case Normal mode analysis of protein dynamics , 1994 .

[16]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Harmonic analysis of large systems. I. Methodology , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[18]  Eva Nogales,et al.  New insights into microtubule structure and function from the atomic model of tubulin , 1998, European Biophysics Journal.

[19]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[21]  E. Nogales,et al.  Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. , 1998, Nature.

[22]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Analysis of domain motions in large proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[23]  E. Hamel,et al.  Direct Photoaffinity Labeling of Cysteine 211 or a Nearby Amino Acid Residue of β-Tubulin by Guanosine 5′-Diphosphate Bound in the Exchangeable Site* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  R. Luduena Multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications. , 1998, International review of cytology.

[25]  L. Amos,et al.  How Taxol stabilises microtubule structure. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[26]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Collective motions in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase: examination of flexibility and enzyme function. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  D. Guénard,et al.  Relationships between the structure of taxol analogues and their antimitotic activity. , 1991, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  S. Weiss Fluorescence spectroscopy of single biomolecules. , 1999, Science.

[29]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[30]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Vibrational Dynamics of Folded Proteins: Significance of Slow and Fast Motions in Relation to Function and Stability , 1998 .

[31]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[32]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[33]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Vibrational dynamics of transfer RNAs: comparison of the free and synthetase-bound forms. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  D. Sackett,et al.  Localization of the colchicine-binding site of tubulin. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Jordan,et al.  Microtubule dynamics: taking aim at a moving target. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[36]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin structure: insights into microtubule properties and functions. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  The GTP-binding peptide of beta-tubulin. Localization by direct photoaffinity labeling and comparison with nucleotide-binding proteins. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  T. Fojo,et al.  Paclitaxel-resistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cells Have Mutant β-Tubulins That Exhibit Impaired Paclitaxel-driven Polymerization* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  D. Botstein,et al.  Structure-function relationships in yeast tubulins. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[40]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[41]  C. Surridge,et al.  Tubulin: conservation and structure , 1994 .

[42]  H. Erickson,et al.  Atomic structures of tubulin and FtsZ. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[43]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[44]  N Go,et al.  A theorem on amplitudes of thermal atomic fluctuations in large molecules assuming specific conformations calculated by normal mode analysis. , 1990, Biophysical chemistry.

[45]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[46]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: Application to α‐amylase inhibitor , 2000, Proteins.

[47]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Model‐free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulation: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme , 1997, Proteins.

[48]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Microtubule polymerization dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[49]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[50]  E. Hamel,et al.  Direct Photoaffinity Labeling of Cysteine-295 of α-Tubulin by Guanosine 5′-Triphosphate Bound in the Nonexchangeable Site* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data , 1998, Proteins.

[52]  I. Bahar,et al.  Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .

[53]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.