Seismic behavior of an innovative hybrid beam-column connection for precast concrete structures

Abstract Precast concrete structures have become a popular option among available structural forms for their superior mechanical characteristics, economy and sustainable development as well as architectural versatility. However, some technical problem such as complex load path, uncertainty of structural stiffness of beam-column joints and inconvenience for disassembly hinders the application and development of precast concrete structures. In this study, an innovative hybrid beam-column connection is proposed with hierarchy of strong connection and weak structural members for precast concrete structures. An experimental and numerical study is organized to study the seismic behavior of the proposed connection including hysteretic curves, skeleton curves and dissipation capacity. The experimental results showed that the new hybrid beam-column connection can reduce the stress concentration effect at the joint and achieve comparable mechanical performance with cast-in-site connections. A numerical investigation on the seismic behavior of the hybrid beam-column connection is carried out. The benchmark models are initially created and validated against the test data and after that a small-scale parametric study is organized. The effect of the position of I-sectional connector (d), the length of cladding plates (l) and axial compression ratio (α) on seismic behavior of the hybrid beam-column connection is investigated and analyzed.

[1]  Florin V. Tosa,et al.  The Behavior of Different Precast Concrete Structures Under Seismic Action , 2016 .

[2]  Kim S. Elliott Research and development in precast concrete framed structures , 2000 .

[3]  Y. Yong,et al.  Behavior of partially precast steel reinforced concrete columns under eccentric loading , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[4]  Carlos Zanuy,et al.  Experimental assessment of connections for precast concrete frames using ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete , 2013 .

[5]  John L. Wilson,et al.  Performance of precast concrete load-bearing panel structures in regions of low to moderate seismicity , 2008 .

[6]  Luciano Catallo,et al.  Genetic anti-optimization for reliability structural assessment of precast concrete structures , 2004 .

[7]  Davide Bellotti,et al.  Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of reinforced precast concrete framed structures , 2015 .

[8]  Michael Hafner,et al.  Connections Between Precast Elements—Failure Within Connection Region , 1989 .

[9]  Heeyoung Lee,et al.  Lateral loading performance of the joint between a precast concrete girder and a steel pier , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[10]  Chang-Sik Choi,et al.  Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections , 2013 .

[11]  Sassan Eshghi,et al.  A modified moment resisting connection for ductile steel frames (Numerical and experimental investigation) , 2009 .

[12]  De-Cheng Feng,et al.  Finite element modelling approach for precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[13]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Seismic Performance of Precast Industrial Facilities Following Major Earthquakes in the Italian Territory , 2015 .

[14]  Dongzhi Guan,et al.  Experimental study of a new beam-to-column connection for precast concrete frames under reversal cyclic loading , 2016 .

[15]  Sergio M. Alcocer,et al.  Seismic tests of beam-to-column connections in a precast concrete frame , 2002 .

[16]  Annibale Luigi Materazzi,et al.  Beam-column joints in continuous RC frames: Comparison between cast-in-situ and precast solutions , 2016 .

[17]  Michael Hafner,et al.  Connections between Precast ElementsFailure Outside Connection Region , 1989 .