Effective resistance and other graph measures for network robustness

Robustness is the ability of a network to continue performing well when it is subject to failures or attacks. In this thesis we survey robustness measures on simple, undirected and unweighted graphs, network failures being interpreted as vertex or edge deletions. We study graph measures based on connectivity, distance, betweenness and clustering. Besides these, reliability polynomials and measures based on the Laplacian eigenvalues are considered. In addition to surveying existing measures, we propose a new robustness measure, the normalized effective resistance, which is derived from the total effective resistance. Total effective resistance is — within the field of electric circuit analysis — defined as the sum of the pairwise effective resistances over all pairs of vertices. The strength of this measure lies in the fact that all (not necessarily disjoint) paths are considered, in other words, the more backup possibilities, the larger the normalized effective resistance and the larger the robustness. A chapter is dedicated to optimizing the normalized effective resistance, first for graphs with a fixed number of vertices and diameter, and second for the addition of an edge to a given graph. For all of the measures described above we evaluate the effectiveness as a measure of network robustness. The discussion and comparison of robustness measures is illustrated by a number of examples. Where possible we make extensions to weighted graphs and for all statements we provide either an elaboration of the original proof, or — when a rigorous proof is not available — we provide one ourselves.

[1]  Sundaram Seshu,et al.  Linear Graphs and Electrical Networks , 1961 .

[2]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .

[3]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[4]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[5]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[6]  B. Mohar THE LAPLACIAN SPECTRUM OF GRAPHS y , 1991 .

[7]  Aaron D. Wyner,et al.  Reliable Circuits Using Less Reliable Relays , 1993 .

[8]  M. Randic,et al.  Resistance distance , 1993 .

[9]  Daryl D. Harms,et al.  Reliability polynomials can cross twice , 1993 .

[10]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[14]  J. Stoer,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2002, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[16]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[17]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[19]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times , 2005, computational complexity.

[21]  Yaron Singer,et al.  Dynamic Measure of Network Robustness , 2006, 2006 IEEE 24th Convention of Electrical & Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[22]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[23]  Piet Van Mieghem Performance Analysis of Communications Networks and Systems: Random variables , 2006 .

[24]  van Dam Graphs with given diameter maximizing the spectral radius , 2007 .

[25]  Robert E. Kooij,et al.  ELASTICITY: Topological Characterization of Robustness in Complex Networks , 2008, BIONETICS.

[26]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  On Robust Traffic Engineering in Core Networks , 2008 .

[27]  A. Jamakovic,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: Application to robustness analysis , 2008 .

[28]  R. W. Hofstad,et al.  Percolation and random graphs , 2009 .

[29]  John S. Baras,et al.  Efficient and robust communication topologies for distributed decision making in networked systems , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[30]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Clustering in weighted networks , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[31]  R. Kooij,et al.  A Framework for Computing Topological Network Robustness , 2010 .

[32]  Robert E. Kooij,et al.  Graphs with given diameter maximizing the algebraic connectivity , 2010 .

[33]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Graph Spectra for Complex Networks , 2010 .

[34]  Willem H. Haemers,et al.  Spectra of Graphs , 2011 .

[35]  F. Spieksma,et al.  Effective graph resistance , 2011 .