Computer-aided classification of breast microcalcification clusters: merging of features from image processing and radiologists

We developed an ensemble classifier for the task of computer-aided diagnosis of breast microcalcification clusters,which are very challenging to characterize for radiologists and computer models alike. The purpose of this study is to help radiologists identify whether suspicious calcification clusters are benign vs. malignant, such that they may potentially recommend fewer unnecessary biopsies for actually benign lesions. The data consists of mammographic features extracted by automated image processing algorithms as well as manually interpreted by radiologists according to a standardized lexicon. We used 292 cases from a publicly available mammography database. From each cases, we extracted 22 image processing features pertaining to lesion morphology, 5 radiologist features also pertaining to morphology, and the patient age. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were designed using each of the three data types. Each local model performed poorly; the best was one based upon image processing features which yielded ROC area index AZ of 0.59 ± 0.03 and partial AZ above 90% sensitivity of 0.08 ± 0.03. We then developed ensemble models using different combinations of those data types, and these models all improved performance compared to the local models. The final ensemble model was based upon 5 features selected by stepwise LDA from all 28 available features. This ensemble performed with AZ of 0.69 ± 0.03 and partial AZ of 0.21 ± 0.04, which was statistically significantly better than the model based on the image processing features alone (p<0.001 and p=0.01 for full and partial AZ respectively). This demonstrated the value of the radiologist-extracted features as a source of information for this task. It also suggested there is potential for improved performance using this ensemble classifier approach to combine different sources of currently available data.

[1]  R Wilson Management of probably benign breast lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Combining Artificial Neural Nets: Ensemble and Modular Multi-Net Systems , 1999 .

[3]  D. Chen,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis for surgical office-based breast ultrasound. , 2000, Archives of surgery.

[4]  W Qian,et al.  Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[5]  Eitan M. Gurari,et al.  Introduction to the theory of computation , 1989 .

[6]  Y H Chang,et al.  Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[7]  L W Bassett,et al.  Breast imaging for the 1990s. , 1991, Seminars in oncology.

[8]  Myer Goldman,et al.  College of radiology , 1969 .

[9]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[11]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  C Kimme-Smith,et al.  Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  C. Floyd,et al.  Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network , 1994, Cancer.

[14]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[15]  C E Floyd,et al.  Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[17]  D. Cyrlak,et al.  Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[18]  Marios A Gavrielides,et al.  Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for the segmentation of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. , 2002, Medical physics.

[19]  D. Chen,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis using self-organizing map for sonography. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  C. Floyd,et al.  Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[21]  M. Giger,et al.  Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[22]  D. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[25]  L P Clarke,et al.  Digital mammography: hybrid four-channel wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[26]  C. Floyd,et al.  Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Analysis of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' performance using an independent database , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  R A Clark,et al.  False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[29]  X. Varas,et al.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[30]  J. Swets,et al.  Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. , 1992, Radiology.

[31]  B. Zheng,et al.  Mass detection in digitized mammograms using two independent computer-assisted diagnosis schemes. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[33]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medical Imaging , 2001, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[34]  F Schmidt,et al.  An automatic method for the identification and interpretation of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  C. Metz,et al.  A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. , 1996, Radiology.

[36]  Y H Chang,et al.  Incorporation of a set enumeration trees-based classifier into a hybrid computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mass detection. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[37]  Michael Sipser,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Computation , 1996, SIGA.

[38]  P Haddawy,et al.  Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer , 1997, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[39]  C. Floyd,et al.  Effect of patient histoy data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks , 1999 .

[40]  Y H Chang,et al.  Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering. , 2001, Medical physics.

[41]  C E Floyd,et al.  Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. , 2000, Medical physics.

[42]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[43]  Y. Wu,et al.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1993, Radiology.