Comparative analysis of optical coherence tomography retinal imagesusing multidimensional and cluster methods.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has many uses in medicine and engineering biology. It is a non-invasive technique for looking at the layered structures of tissues, such as skin, retina, teeth, and heart. Scanning of the retinal image reveals defects in the underlying layers. OCT performs in situ high resolution cross sectional imaging on a micron scale in real time. An application of OCT is in the imaging of diseases such as central serous retinopathy (CSR), which is the result of fluid accumulation under the macula. In the acquired OCT image, an inherent characteristic of coherent imaging is the presence of speckle noise. Reduction of speckle noise is one of the most important considerations for increasing the quality of coherent images. To enhance the quality, different filtering techniques are applied to analyze spectral noise in a CSR-OCT image. To analyze the effectiveness of the applied filtering techniques, various statistical parameters are applied and studied, such as the mean square error, peak signal to noise ratio, normalized crosscorrelation, and normalized absolute error. In this study, the resultant statistical information from the applied statistical parameters is subjected to multidimensional analysis to determine the best filtering technique to reduce speckle noise in CSR-OCT images.

[1]  Andrew M Rollins,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography using angular compounding by B-scan Doppler-shift encoding. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Ulrike von Luxburg,et al.  Clustering Stability: An Overview , 2010, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[3]  P. Firat,et al.  Evaluation of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, macula and ganglion cell thickness in amblyopia using spectral optical coherence tomography. , 2013, International journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Brendan F Kennedy,et al.  Speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography images using tissue viscoelasticity. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  Ulrike von Luxburg,et al.  Optimal construction of k-nearest-neighbor graphs for identifying noisy clusters , 2009, Theoretical Computer Science.

[6]  Michael Hughes,et al.  Speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography of paint layers. , 2010, Applied optics.

[7]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Is Denoising Dead? , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Patch-Based Near-Optimal Image Denoising , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Wavelet denoising of multiframe optical coherence tomography data , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[11]  A. Curatolo,et al.  Detection of multiple scattering in optical coherence tomography by speckle correlation of angle-dependent B-scans. , 2010, Optics letters.

[12]  Edmund Y Lam,et al.  Wavelet domain compounding for speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  Norberto M. Grzywacz,et al.  Statistics of Optical Coherence Tomography Data From Human Retina , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.