Three-dimensional fit-to-flow microfluidic assembly.

Three-dimensional microfluidics holds great promise for large-scale integration of versatile, digitalized, and multitasking fluidic manipulations for biological and clinical applications. Successful translation of microfluidic toolsets to these purposes faces persistent technical challenges, such as reliable system-level packaging, device assembly and alignment, and world-to-chip interface. In this paper, we extended our previously established fit-to-flow (F2F) world-to-chip interconnection scheme to a complete system-level assembly strategy that addresses the three-dimensional microfluidic integration on demand. The modular F2F assembly consists of an interfacial chip, pluggable alignment modules, and multiple monolithic layers of microfluidic channels, through which convoluted three-dimensional microfluidic networks can be easily assembled and readily sealed with the capability of reconfigurable fluid flow. The monolithic laser-micromachining process simplifies and standardizes the fabrication of single-layer pluggable polymeric modules, which can be mass-produced as the renowned Lego(®) building blocks. In addition, interlocking features are implemented between the plug-and-play microfluidic chips and the complementary alignment modules through the F2F assembly, resulting in facile and secure alignment with average misalignment of 45 μm. Importantly, the 3D multilayer microfluidic assembly has a comparable sealing performance as the conventional single-layer devices, providing an average leakage pressure of 38.47 kPa. The modular reconfigurability of the system-level reversible packaging concept has been demonstrated by re-routing microfluidic flows through interchangeable modular microchannel layers.

[1]  Po Ki Yuen,et al.  SmartBuild-a truly plug-n-play modular microfluidic system. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Bruce K. Gale,et al.  Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices , 2008 .

[3]  D T Chiu,et al.  Using three-dimensional microfluidic networks for solving computationally hard problems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Alex Groisman,et al.  An easy to assemble microfluidic perfusion device with a magnetic clamp. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Michael W L Watson,et al.  Hybrid microfluidics: a digital-to-channel interface for in-line sample processing and chemical separations. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Daniel C Leslie,et al.  Frequency-specific flow control in microfluidic circuits with passive elastomeric features , 2009 .

[8]  Kit S Lam,et al.  Capillary-driven automatic packaging. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[9]  Tingrui Pan,et al.  Fit-to-Flow (F2F) interconnects: universal reversible adhesive-free microfluidic adaptors for lab-on-a-chip systems. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[10]  G. Whitesides The origins and the future of microfluidics , 2006, Nature.

[11]  Teruo Fujii,et al.  A plug and play microfluidic device. , 2003, Lab on a chip.

[12]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Solving the "world-to-chip" interface problem with a microfluidic matrix. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Debra T Auguste,et al.  Fabrication of reversibly adhesive fluidic devices using magnetism. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[14]  Kee Suk Ryu,et al.  A modular microfluidic architecture for integrated biochemical analysis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  A world-to-chip interface for digital microfluidics. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Mark Horowitz,et al.  Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves , 2010 .

[17]  Siwei Zhao,et al.  Stereomask lithography (SML): a universal multi-object micro-patterning technique for biological applications. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[18]  Hongkai Wu,et al.  Fabrication of complex three-dimensional microchannel systems in PDMS. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  B. Mosadegh,et al.  Integrated Elastomeric Components for Autonomous Regulation of Sequential and Oscillatory Flow Switching in Microfluidic Devices , 2010, Nature physics.

[20]  Tingrui Pan,et al.  Three-dimensional surface microfluidics enabled by spatiotemporal control of elastic fluidic interface. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[21]  Z Hugh Fan,et al.  Macro-to-micro interfaces for microfluidic devices. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Hai-Qing Gong,et al.  Templateless prototyping of polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic structures using a pulsed CO2 laser , 2009 .

[23]  Noo Li Jeon,et al.  Vascular mimetics based on microfluidics for imaging the leukocyte--endothelial inflammatory response. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[24]  J. Chang,et al.  Active sealing for soft polymer microchips: method and practical applications , 2006 .

[25]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterned deposition of cells and proteins onto surfaces by using three-dimensional microfluidic systems. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Beebe,et al.  Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[27]  C. Greiner,et al.  SU-8: a photoresist for high-aspect-ratio and 3D submicron lithography , 2007 .

[28]  Siwei Zhao,et al.  Direct projection on dry-film photoresist (DP(2)): do-it-yourself three-dimensional polymer microfluidics. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[29]  I. Mezić,et al.  Chaotic Mixer for Microchannels , 2002, Science.

[30]  Tingrui Pan,et al.  From Cleanroom to Desktop: Emerging Micro-Nanofabrication Technology for Biomedical Applications , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Mark A Burns,et al.  Microfluidic assembly blocks. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[32]  Brian N. Johnson,et al.  Flexible casting of modular self-aligning microfluidic assembly blocks. , 2011, Lab on a chip.