Movement of Potato Tuberworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) within and Between Crops, and Some Comparisons with Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)

Abstract Movement of potato tuberworm, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), and diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), was examined indirectly by estimating their distribution, and directly by using mark-recapture techniques. Trapping techniques including trap tubers and trap plants were used to assess the distance that potato tuberworm moved from infested crops. These experiments suggested that a low proportion of moths foraged beyond 100–250 m to infest tubers or plants. Light traps indicated that the number of moths moving out from crops diminished over a 40-m distance. Dispersing moths penetrated 30 m into new crops to infest the foliage. Direct movement of potato tuberworm and diamondback moth between crops was estimated using mark-recapture experiments. Fluorescent dusts were more effective than felt pen for marking, and moths were recaptured with sweep-nets followed 1 d later by pheromone trapping. From sweep-net collections of potato tuberworm, a mean of ≈17% of moths was shown to move between crops. Only 1.2% of diamondback moth was recaptured by sweep netting outside the release area and very few moths were caught in pheromone traps. These results, together with the literature, suggest that sufficient potato tuberworm would forage between adjacent treated and untreated crops to minimize the development of insecticide resistance. The use of refuges to conserve susceptible pest populations is recommended for managing resistance that may arise from any future use of Bt-transgenic potatoes or Brassica spp. in New Zealand. Refuges that are intended to dilute potential resistance of potato tuberworm to transgenic crops should be placed close to transgenic potato crops.

[1]  C. G. Johnson,et al.  Migration and dispersal of insects by flight. , 1971 .

[2]  E. Grafius,et al.  Evaluation of Natural and Engineered Resistance Mechanisms in Solanum tuberosum for Resistance to Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) , 1998 .

[3]  P. Fenemore Host-plant location and selection by adult potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): A review , 1988 .

[4]  G. Burnip,et al.  Dispersal of Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) and Planotortrix octo Dugdale (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) at a Canterbury, New Zealand orchard. , 1994 .

[5]  M. A. Foot Field assessment of several insecticides against the potato tuber moth (Phthorimaea operculella Zell. Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) at Pukekohe , 1974 .

[6]  J. H. White,et al.  THE DIAMOND‐BACK MOTH OUTBREAK OF 1958 , 1960 .

[7]  A. Shelton,et al.  Comparative insecticide resistance of New Zealand and North American populations of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Piuteiiidae) , 1997 .

[8]  S. Goldson,et al.  Suction trap studies of the potato moth Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) and some observations on its biology , 1977 .

[9]  E. M. Reed,et al.  Factors affecting the status of a virus as a control agent for the potato moth ( Phthorimaea operculella (Zell.) (Lep., Gelechiidae) , 1971 .

[10]  A. Sivapragasam,et al.  A yellow sticky trap for the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) , 1986 .

[11]  D. Robson,et al.  Sample Size in Petersen Mark–Recapture Experiments , 1964 .

[12]  G. Rothschild,et al.  Synthesis of the two components of the sex pheromone system of the potato tuberworm moth,Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and field experience with them , 1978, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[13]  F. Gould Evolutionary Biology and Genetically Engineered CropsConsideration of evolutionary theory can aid in crop design , 1988 .

[14]  M. Harris,et al.  Behavioral responses of lightbrown apple moth neonate larvae on diets containing Bacillus thuringiensis formulations or endotoxins , 1997 .

[15]  M. A. Foot Bionomics of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), at Pukekohe , 1979 .

[16]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Allozymes Used to Estimate Gene Flow Among Populations of Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Hawaii , 1992 .

[17]  Juliet D. Tang,et al.  Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Marking Adult Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), and Estimation of Adult Survival Rate and Population Density in a Cabbage Field , 1988 .

[19]  B. Tabashnik,et al.  Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Resistance to Insecticides in Hawaii: Intra-Island Variation and Cross-Resistance , 1987 .

[20]  S. Yathom Phenology of the tuber moth, Gnorimoschema operculella Zell., in Israel in the spring. , 1968 .

[21]  Juliet D. Tang,et al.  Greenhouse Tests on Resistance Management of Bt Transgenic Plants Using Refuge Strategies , 2001, Journal of economic entomology.

[22]  W. Roelofs,et al.  Pheromone Components and Active Spaces: What Do Moths Smell and Where Do They Smell It? , 1987, Science.

[23]  Y. Shirai Comparison of Longevity and Flight Ability in Wild and Laboratory-reared Male Adults of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella(L.)(Lepidoptera:Yponomeutidae) , 1993 .

[24]  Anthony M. Shelton,et al.  Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth , 1993 .

[25]  Myron P. Zalucki,et al.  How should refugia be placed upon the landscape? A modelling study considering pest movement behaviour , 1998 .