Knowledge sharing in virtual communities - a review of the empirical research

This study reviews the recent empirical studies on knowledge sharing in Virtual Communities (VCs). The paper begins with an analysis of the VC conceptualisation and the focal phenomenon of knowledge sharing. Secondly, the factors that seem to facilitate knowledge-sharing activities in VCs are identified and categorised as individual motivations, personal characteristics, technical attributes and community-level social capital. Overall, the results demonstrate a strong emphasis on why individuals engage in such activities, but less attention is given to what is being shared and how the processes of sharing are manifested in practice. The paper concludes with some suggestions for further research.

[1]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[2]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: An exploratory study , 2006, Internet Res..

[3]  Volker Wulf,et al.  IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Anita L. Blanchard,et al.  Virtual Communities and Social Capital , 1998 .

[5]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The community question re-evaluated , 1987 .

[6]  Johann Füller,et al.  Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[7]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Internet and Society , 2003 .

[8]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The experienced "sense" of a virtual community: characteristics and processes , 2004, DATB.

[10]  D. Swanson.  In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work , 2001 .

[11]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  SOCIAL ROLES IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES , 2004 .

[12]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[14]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Satisfaction with Virtual Communities of Interest: Effect on Members' Visit Frequency , 2007 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[17]  Michael Hammond,et al.  Communication within on-line forums: the opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[18]  M. Castells.  The Internet Galaxy , 2001 .

[19]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[20]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  C. Wagner,et al.  Supporting knowledge management in organizations with conversational technologies: Discussion forums, weblogs, and wikis , 2005 .

[22]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[23]  Ingoo Han,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[25]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda , 2003 .

[26]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Gerard Delanty.  The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[28]  W. Galston.  Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community , 2001 .

[29]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination , 2004 .

[31]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social psychological theories of computer-mediated communication: Social gain or social pain? , 2001 .

[32]  Daniel R. Fesenmaier,et al.  Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[33]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[34]  R. Fahey,et al.  The impact of rewards within communities of practice: a study of the SAP online global community , 2007 .

[35]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Beyond the Call of Duty: Why Customers Contribute to Firm-hosted Commercial Online Communities , 2007 .

[36]  L. Kendall.  Recontextualizing “Cyberspace”: Methodological Considerations for on-Line Research , 1999 .

[37]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[38]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  The creation of social and intellectual capital in virtual communities of practice: shaping social structure in virtual communities of practice , 2006 .

[39]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[40]  E. Tsui,et al.  Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice , 2007 .

[41]  G. Hutton.  Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[42]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Won-Seok Yoo,et al.  Exploring the Factors Enhancing Member Participation in Virtual Communities , 2002, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[44]  Wei Li,et al.  Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[46]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[47]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[48]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[49]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[50]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Information Sharing Online: A Research Challenge , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[51]  E. L. Cox,et al.  Investigating The Contradictions In Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[52]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[53]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[55]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[56]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  In good company: how social capital makes organizations work , 2001, UBIQ.

[57]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[58]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  DESIGNING VIRTUAL CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENTS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT : TOWARD A THEORY , 2005 .

[59]  David Bawden,et al.  Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology , 2007, J. Documentation.

[60]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[61]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[62]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[63]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[64]  Constance Elise Porter,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[65]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[66]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[67]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[68]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[69]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.