The moderating influence of self-efficacy on interoceptive ability and counterintuitive decision making in officer cadets

Abstract The rapid technical progress in cyber threats and cyber security poses increased cognitive demands on cyber officers. The macrocognitive demand characteristics placed on the cyber officers exceed those in most common military contexts and are new in nature. Research on decision-making competence within the cyber domain is needed to identify strategies and give a better understanding of how these strategies can have consequences depending on task characteristics. Belief in one’s capabilities to handle a certain task has been shown to be a key factor for cognitive performance. This study investigated how high self-efficacy negatively moderated intuitive decision-making tendencies on performance when facing a problem that required counterintuitive strategies. Twenty-seven cyber officer cadets from the Norwegian Defence Cyber Academy participated in an experiment assessing self-efficacy, interoceptive sensitivity, and decision-making. Participants with high situational self-efficacy generally performed better, but this relationship was moderated by interoceptive sensitivity. The findings suggest potential detrimental effects of intuitive decision-making tendencies in combination with high self-efficacy. Implications for training and feedback structures in cyber defense are discussed.

[1]  H. Rüddel,et al.  Heart Beat Perception in Patients with Depressive, Somatoform, and Personality Disorders , 1999 .

[2]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[3]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristicsandbiases heuristicsandbiases heuristicsandbiases andbiases andbiases tasks , 2011 .

[4]  James C. Christensen,et al.  Human Factors in Cyber Warfare II , 2014 .

[5]  Erik Dane,et al.  Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making , 2007 .

[6]  Kirsi Helkala,et al.  How the application of coping strategies can empower learning , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  A. Bechara,et al.  The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomics research , 2010 .

[9]  Ricardo G. Lugo,et al.  Exploring the Hybrid Space - Theoretical Framework Applying Cognitive Science in Military Cyberspace Operations , 2016, HCI.

[10]  Olga Pollatos,et al.  Interoceptive awareness mediates the relationship between anxiety and the intensity of unpleasant feelings. , 2007, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[11]  Yair Levy,et al.  The role of user computer self-efficacy, cybersecurity countermeasures awareness, and cybersecurity skills influence on computer misuse , 2013 .

[12]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[14]  H. Ohira The Somatic Marker Revisited: Brain and Body in Emotional Decision Making , 2010 .

[15]  R. Schandry,et al.  Heart beat perception and emotional experience. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[16]  P. Hancock,et al.  The Human Factors of Cyber Network Defense , 2015 .

[17]  A. Bandura GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[18]  Robert Buch,et al.  The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy , 2015 .

[19]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Is General Self-Efficacy a Universal Construct ? * Psychometric Findings from 25 Countries , 2002 .

[20]  Florian Klapproth,et al.  Time and decision making in humans , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Hanne Eggen Roislien,et al.  When the generation gap collides with military structure: The case of the Norwegian cyber officers , 2015 .

[22]  Karol G. Ross,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision Model , 2004 .

[23]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Stefan Sütterlin,et al.  Enhanced Cardiac Perception Is Associated With Increased Susceptibility to Framing Effects , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  G. Fricchione Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[26]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Schulz,et al.  Cold pressor stress induces opposite effects on cardioceptive accuracy dependent on assessment paradigm , 2013, Biological Psychology.

[28]  A. Damasio The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries , 2005 .

[30]  Mass Soldal Lund,et al.  Effect of Motivation and Physical Fitness on Cyber Tasks , 2015, HAISA.

[31]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2022 .

[32]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Is General Self-Efficacy a Universal Construct?1 , 2002 .

[33]  Kazuo Shigemasu,et al.  Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[34]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[36]  Gregory J. Funke,et al.  Human Factors of Cyber Attacks , 2014 .

[37]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[38]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[39]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[40]  Jamil Zaki,et al.  Overlapping activity in anterior insula during interoception and emotional experience , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  Mass Soldal Lund,et al.  Factors to affect improvement in cyber officer performance , 2016, Inf. Comput. Secur..

[42]  R. Buch,et al.  The relationships between academic self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence , 2015 .

[43]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Frames, decisions, and cardiac–autonomic control , 2011, Social neuroscience.

[44]  G. Campitelli,et al.  Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[45]  J. Bargh The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[46]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[47]  D. Feltz,et al.  Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[48]  R. Schandry,et al.  Heartbeat detection and the experience of emotions , 2009 .