Development and Validation of Scales to Measure the Strategic Potential  of IT-Enabled Resources: A Resource-Based Approach

This paper describes the development of reliable and valid scales for assessing the strategic potential of IT-enabled resources. Following to the resource-based view of the firm (RBV), the strategic potential of organizational resources may be assessed by four resource attributes - value, rarity, inimitability, and non-substitutability. The RBV contends that these four attributes provide a link between organizational resources and performance, at the level of the firm. While resource attributes are a central and critical element of resource-based logic, they have not been systematically operationalized. This paper presents a set of measures with satisfactory psychometric properties that can be adapted by researchers and managers to assess the strategic potential of multiple types of IT-enabled resources. The measures are tested using survey data from 150 customer service managers who recently implemented an information technology. The attribute measures were able to explain 54% of the variance in firm performance.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  C. Bauer,et al.  Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement—Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation , 2002 .

[3]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[4]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[5]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[6]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[7]  J. Hulland,et al.  Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures , 2007 .

[8]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after , 1995 .

[9]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[12]  M. Morton,et al.  The Transforming Power of Complementary Assets , 2006 .

[13]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information technology and the performance of the customer service process , 2005 .

[14]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[15]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[16]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[17]  Shu Han,et al.  Complementarities between IT and Firm Diversification and Performance Implications , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[18]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[19]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[20]  E. Clemons,et al.  McKesson drug company-a case study of Economost: a strategic information system , 1988, Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1988. Vol.IV. Applications Track.

[21]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[23]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[24]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  Mary C. Meyer,et al.  Customer Satisfaction for Financial Services: The Role of Products, Services, and Information Technology , 1998 .

[26]  Lihui Lin,et al.  Impact of Users’ Expertise on the Competition between Proprietary and Open Source Software , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[27]  J. Barney,et al.  The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991 , 2001 .

[28]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  SIM Paper Competition: Competing Through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the Single European Market , 1994, MIS Q..

[29]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[30]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage , 2001 .

[31]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[33]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[34]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[35]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Reourse-Based Analysis , 1995, MIS Q..

[36]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[37]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[38]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Expert Systems, Knowledge Development and Utilization, and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Model , 1998 .

[39]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences , 1991, MIS Q..

[41]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[42]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Redesigning the Customer Support Process for the Electronic Economy: Insights From Storage Dimensions , 1997, MIS Q..

[43]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[44]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[45]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[47]  M. Markus,et al.  The Organizational Validity of Management Information Systems , 1983 .

[48]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .