Engineering Synthetic Adaptors and Substrates for Controlled ClpXP Degradation*

Facile control of targeted intracellular protein degradation has many potential uses in basic science and biotechnology. One promising approach to this goal is to redesign adaptor proteins, which can regulate proteolytic specificity by tethering substrates to energy-dependent AAA+ proteases. Using the ClpXP protease, we have probed the minimal biochemical functions required for adaptor function by designing and characterizing variant substrates, adaptors, and ClpX enzymes. We find that substrate tethering mediated by heterologous interaction domains and a small bridging molecule mimics substrate delivery by the wild-type system. These results show that simple tethering is sufficient for synthetic adaptor function. In our engineered system, tethering and proteolysis depend on the presence of the macrolide rapamycin, providing a foundation for engineering highly specific degradation of target proteins in cells. Importantly, this degradation is regulated by a small molecule without the need for new adaptor or enzyme biosynthesis.

[1]  Kevin L. Griffith,et al.  Inducible protein degradation in Bacillus subtilis using heterologous peptide tags and adaptor proteins to target substrates to the protease ClpXP , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  T. Baker,et al.  Unique contacts direct high-priority recognition of the tetrameric Mu transposase-DNA complex by the AAA+ unfoldase ClpX. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[3]  Andreas Martin,et al.  Diverse pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine mediate unassisted and adaptor-dependent recognition of ssrA-tagged substrates. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[4]  T. Baker,et al.  Distinct structural elements of the adaptor ClpS are required for regulating degradation by ClpAP , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  Elizabeth E Howell,et al.  Crystal structure of a type II dihydrofolate reductase catalytic ternary complex. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[6]  T. Baker,et al.  Altered Tethering of the SspB Adaptor to the ClpXP Protease Causes Changes in Substrate Delivery* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  H. Song,et al.  Structural basis of SspB-tail recognition by the zinc binding domain of ClpX. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpS modulates but is not essential for bacterial N-end rule degradation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[9]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Altered specificity of a AAA+ protease. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[10]  T. Baker,et al.  ATP-dependent proteases of bacteria: recognition logic and operating principles. , 2006, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  L. Banaszynski,et al.  A Rapid, Reversible, and Tunable Method to Regulate Protein Function in Living Cells Using Synthetic Small Molecules , 2006, Cell.

[12]  W. Houry,et al.  Large nucleotide‐dependent movement of the N‐terminal domain of the ClpX chaperone , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Engineering controllable protein degradation. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[14]  Jonathan Weissman,et al.  Molecular Chaperones and Protein Quality Control , 2006, Cell.

[15]  Janine Kirstein,et al.  Adaptor protein controlled oligomerization activates the AAA+ protein ClpC , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[16]  J. Schneider-Mergener,et al.  ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli , 2006, Nature.

[17]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Rebuilt AAA + motors reveal operating principles for ATP-fuelled machines , 2005, Nature.

[18]  T. Baker,et al.  Versatile modes of peptide recognition by the AAA+ adaptor protein SspB , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  Greg L. Hersch,et al.  Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines , 2004, Cell.

[20]  T. Baker,et al.  Modulating substrate choice: the SspB adaptor delivers a regulator of the extracytoplasmic-stress response to the AAA+ protease ClpXP for degradation. , 2004, Genes & development.

[21]  George M Church,et al.  Localization to the Proteasome Is Sufficient for Degradation* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Bivalent tethering of SspB to ClpXP is required for efficient substrate delivery: a protein-design study. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[23]  W. Houry,et al.  The N-terminal Zinc Binding Domain of ClpX Is a Dimerization Domain That Modulates the Chaperone Function* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Proteolysis in bacterial regulatory circuits. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[25]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[26]  T. Baker,et al.  Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[27]  T. Baker,et al.  Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[28]  B. Bukau,et al.  Targeted delivery of an ssrA-tagged substrate by the adaptor protein SspB to its cognate AAA+ protein ClpX. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[29]  M. Eck,et al.  Structural basis of degradation signal recognition by SspB, a specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP proteolytic machine. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[30]  T. Baker,et al.  Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage. , 2003, Genes & development.

[31]  T. Baker,et al.  Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[32]  T. Baker,et al.  Characterization of a specificity factor for an AAA+ ATPase: assembly of SspB dimers with ssrA-tagged proteins and the ClpX hexamer. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[33]  A. Horwich,et al.  ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[34]  A. Steven,et al.  Functional Domains of the ClpA and ClpX Molecular Chaperones Identified by Limited Proteolysis and Deletion Analysis* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  T. Baker,et al.  Molecular determinants of complex formation between Clp/Hsp100 ATPases and the ClpP peptidase , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  T. Baker,et al.  A specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Science.

[37]  T. Baker,et al.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[38]  A. Steven,et al.  Enzymatic and Structural Similarities between theEscherichia coli ATP-dependent Proteases, ClpXP and ClpAP* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  R. Sauer,et al.  The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. , 1998, Genes & development.

[40]  A. Fire,et al.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, Nature.

[41]  Jan E. Schnitzer,et al.  Role of GTP Hydrolysis in Fission of Caveolae Directly from Plasma Membranes , 1996, Science.

[42]  S. Smith,et al.  The amino acid sequence of the trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase specified in Escherichia coli by R-plasmid R67. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  D. Baccanari,et al.  R plasmid dihydrofolate reductase with subunit structure. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  R. Harvey,et al.  Two distinct types of trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase specified by R-plasmids of different compatibility groups. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  N. Datta,et al.  Trimethoprim Resistance determined by R Factors , 1972, British medical journal.

[46]  J. G. Nørby.  [11] Coupled assay of Na+,K+-ATPase activity , 1988 .