Key Challenges in the Status Analysis for the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan in Podgorica, Montenegro

The paper presents the results of the application of a practical approach for collecting data, which provides a simple, cost efficient, and easily reproducible method that was applied to obtain the necessary data for the status analysis of the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) for Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro. Important data for the estimation of the existing condition of the traffic system were collected through desk research from the appropriate institutions and organizations. Several surveys and focus group interviews were conducted, in which about 5000 residents of Podgorica participated. In addition to answering questions, residents made numerous suggestions, confirming the correctness of a participatory approach in the new traffic planning paradigm that provides the SUMP with crucial advantages. A manual cordon count of traffic on five bridges for the traffic of the motor vehicles, as well as on two pedestrian-only bridges, was performed by students from the study program Road Traffic, and there are plans to repeat this in the coming years in order to enable more reliable monitoring and evaluation of the obtained data. Contemporary quality management tools such as BYPAD and ParkPAD were also used to assess the status of cycling and parking policy, respectively. It is especially important to emphasize that Podgorica is the first city in the West Balkans, and the fourth city in Europe, in which the ParkPAD tool was applied. A wide range of negative phenomena and trends was identified, like a rapid increase in the number of registered vehicles, an increase in the motorization rate and the number of traffic accidents, increased non-compliance with traffic rules, excessive use of passenger cars and auto-taxi vehicles, insufficient use of unattractive public transport, walking and cycling, etc. Based on the data collected, key challenges in status analysis in Podgorica were identified, which the SUMP should try to overcome.

[1]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[2]  Awais Piracha,et al.  Mobility in daily life: between freedom and unfreedom , 2010 .

[3]  David Banister,et al.  Sustainable Mobility at Thirty , 2019, Sustainability.

[4]  Petter Næss,et al.  Sustainable urban development and the multi- level transition perspective , 2012 .

[5]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. , 2011, Environment international.

[6]  Eleftherios Sdoukopoulos,et al.  Parking Policies for Supporting Sustainable Mobility , 2012 .

[7]  Maurício Dziedzic,et al.  Sustainability of urban mobility projects in the Curitiba metropolitan region , 2017 .

[8]  Jose Maria Diez,et al.  Methodology for assessing the cost effectiveness of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs). The case of the city of Burgos , 2018 .

[9]  Jorge Curiel-Esparza,et al.  Prioritization by consensus of enhancements for sustainable mobility in urban areas , 2016 .

[10]  Kornilia Maria Kotoula,et al.  Travelers-led Innovation in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans , 2019, Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering.

[11]  P. R. Kanof,et al.  Sustainable urban transportation , 2009 .

[12]  Niels Agerholm,et al.  Speed-calming measures and their Effect on driving speed: Test of a new technique measuring speeds based on GNSS data , 2017 .

[13]  Ana Louro,et al.  Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies as a Path to Healthy Cities—The Case Study of LMA, Portugal , 2019, Sustainability.

[14]  Giuseppe Inturri,et al.  “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans”: Key Concepts and a Critical Revision on SUMPs Guidelines , 2020, ICCSA.

[15]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[16]  Maja Kiba-Janiak,et al.  Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: How Do They Work? , 2019, Sustainability.

[17]  Maja Kiba-Janiak Urban freight transport in city strategic planning , 2017 .

[18]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Susanne Böhler-Baedeker,et al.  Citizen and stakeholder involvement: a precondition for sustainable urban mobility , 2014 .

[20]  S Marshall,et al.  The challenge of sustainable transport , 2001 .

[21]  M. Trombetti,et al.  Evaluating the impact of “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans” on urban background air quality , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  David Banister,et al.  The sustainable mobility paradigm , 2008 .

[23]  A Fyhri,et al.  Safety in numbers for cyclists-conclusions from a multidisciplinary study of seasonal change in interplay and conflicts. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Shriniwas S Arkatkar,et al.  Benchmarking: A tool for evaluation and monitoring sustainability of urban transport system in metropolitan cities of India , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[25]  Kazimierz Jamroz,et al.  Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning , 2018 .

[26]  R. Hickman,et al.  Planning more for sustainable mobility , 2013 .

[27]  Nicola Orsini,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[28]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology , 2018 .

[29]  J. Pucher,et al.  Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland , 2017 .

[30]  S. Werland Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU , 2020 .

[31]  Sven Kesselring,et al.  What is Smart for the Future City? Mobilities and Automation , 2019, Sustainability.

[32]  Rob Carter,et al.  Evidence for associations between traffic calming and safety and active transport or obesity: A scoping review , 2017 .

[33]  Francesco Russo,et al.  City characteristics and urban goods movements: a way to environmental transportation system in a su , 2011 .

[34]  Marjan Lep,et al.  Comprehensive Traffic Calming as a Key Element of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans—Impacts of a Neighbourhood Redesign in Ljutomer , 2020, Sustainability.

[35]  R. M. Arce-Ruiz,et al.  The way to sustainable mobility. A comparative analysis of sustainable mobility plans in Spain , 2018, Transport Policy.

[36]  G. Tesoriere,et al.  Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy , 2020, Sustainability.

[37]  Audrius Vaitkus,et al.  Traffic Calming Measures: An Evaluation of the Effect on Driving Speed , 2017 .

[38]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[39]  A. Sdoukopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of sustainable urban mobility in the city of Thessaloniki , 2017 .