Neural Development of Binaural Tuning through Hebbian Learning Predicts Frequency-Dependent Best Delays

Birds use microsecond differences in the arrival times of the sounds at the two ears to infer the location of a sound source in the horizontal plane. These interaural time differences (ITDs) are encoded by binaural neurons which fire more when the ITD matches their “best delay.” In the textbook model of sound localization, the best delays of binaural neurons reflect the differences in axonal delays of their monaural inputs, but recent observations have cast doubts on this classical view because best delays were found to depend on preferred frequency. Here, we show that these observations are in fact consistent with the notion that best delays are created by differences in axonal delays, provided ITD tuning is created during development through spike-timing-dependent plasticity: basilar membrane filtering results in correlations between inputs to binaural neurons, which impact the selection of synapses during development, leading to the observed distribution of best delays.

[1]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  J I Gold,et al.  A Site of Auditory Experience-Dependent Plasticity in the Neural Representation of Auditory Space in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[4]  B. Grothe,et al.  New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Kempter,et al.  Hebbian learning and spiking neurons , 1999 .

[6]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Stable Hebbian Learning from Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Adaptive auditory plasticity in developing and adult animals , 2007, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  Philip X Joris,et al.  Binaural and cochlear disparities , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  L. Trussell,et al.  Cell-specific, spike timing–dependent plasticities in the dorsal cochlear nucleus , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  H. Ohmori,et al.  Tonotopic Gradients of Membrane and Synaptic Properties for Neurons of the Chicken Nucleus Magnocellularis , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Andrew Moiseff,et al.  Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Y. Dan,et al.  Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking , 2006, Neuron.

[14]  Torsten Marquardt,et al.  Representation of interaural time delay in the human auditory midbrain , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Trussell,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms for coding timing in auditory neurons. , 1999, Annual review of physiology.

[16]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Kempter,et al.  Temporal map formation in the barn owl's brain. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[18]  M. Konishi Coding of auditory space. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Laurence O Trussell,et al.  Cellular mechanisms for preservation of timing in central auditory pathways , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl’s ears , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Romain Brette,et al.  A Threshold Equation for Action Potential Initiation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Avian interaural canal enhances interaural delay , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  Romain Brette,et al.  The Brian Simulator , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[24]  J I Gold,et al.  Hearing impairment induces frequency-specific adjustments in auditory spatial tuning in the optic tectum of young owls. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Detection of Interaural Time Differences in the Alligator , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Yin,et al.  A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Kempter,et al.  Formation of temporal-feature maps by axonal propagation of synaptic learning , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Christine Köppl,et al.  Maps of interaural time difference in the chicken’s brainstem nucleus laminaris , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  Romain Brette,et al.  Spike-Timing-Based Computation in Sound Localization , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Cochlear and Neural Delays for Coincidence Detection in Owls , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Tom C. T. Yin,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Encoding Binaural Localization Cues in the Auditory Brainstem , 2002 .

[34]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Bilateral matching of frequency tuning in neural cross-correlators of the owl , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  Christian Leibold,et al.  Spiking neurons learning phase delays: how mammals may develop auditory time-difference sensitivity. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[36]  Blake A. Richards,et al.  GABAergic circuits control stimulus-instructed receptive field development in the optic tectum , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Adaptive adjustment of unit tuning to sound localization cues in response to monaural occlusion in developing owl optic tectum , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  H. Ohmori,et al.  Tonotopic Specialization of Auditory Coincidence Detection in Nucleus Laminaris of the Chick , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding , 1996, Nature.

[41]  M. Poo,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System , 2006, Neuron.

[42]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Estimated cochlear delays in low best-frequency neurons in the barn owl cannot explain coding of interaural time difference. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  S A Shamma,et al.  Stereausis: binaural processing without neural delays. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  D. McAlpine,et al.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Spectral models , 1994 .