Passive Seismic Monitoring of Natural and Induced Earthquakes: Case Studies, Future Directions and Socio-Economic Relevance

An important discovery in crustal mechanics has been that the Earth’s crust is commonly stressed close to failure, even in tectonically quiet areas. As a result, small natural or man-made perturbations to the local stress field may trigger earthquakes. To understand these processes, Passive Seismic Monitoring (PSM) with seismometer arrays is a widely used technique that has been successfully applied to study seismicity at different magnitude levels ranging from acoustic emissions generated in the laboratory under controlled conditions, to seismicity induced by hydraulic stimulations in geological reservoirs, and up to great earthquakes occurring along plate boundaries. In all these environments the appropriate deployment of seismic sensors, i.e., directly on the rock sample, at the earth’s surface or in boreholes close to the seismic sources allows for the detection and location of brittle failure processes at sufficiently low magnitude-detection threshold and with adequate spatial resolution for further analysis. One principal aim is to develop an improved understanding of the physical processes occurring at the seismic source and their relationship to the host geologic environment. In this paper we review selected case studies and future directions of PSM efforts across a wide range of scales and environments. These include induced failure within small rock samples, hydrocarbon reservoirs, and natural seismicity at convergent and transform plate boundaries. Each example represents a milestone with regard to bridging the gap between laboratory-scale experiments under controlled boundary conditions and large-scale field studies. The common motivation for all studies is to refine the understanding of how earthquakes nucleate, how they proceed and how they interact in space and time. This is of special relevance at the larger end of the magnitude scale, i.e., for large devastating earthquakes due to their severe socio-economic impact.

[1]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Does apparent stress vary with earthquake size? , 2001 .

[2]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Slip‐parallel seismic lineations on the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 1999 .

[3]  Harry Fielding Reid,et al.  The mechanics of the earthquake , 1910 .

[4]  A. McGarr,et al.  40 – Case Histories of Induced and Triggered Seismicity , 2002 .

[5]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa‐Arabia‐Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions , 2005 .

[6]  Tom Parsons,et al.  Recalculated probability of M >= 7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey , 2004 .

[7]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  The active Main Marmara Fault , 2001 .

[8]  W. Bakun,et al.  Earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Comparing the 1934 and 1966 Sequences , 1979, Science.

[9]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Streaks, multiplets, and holes: High‐resolution spatio‐temporal behavior of Parkfield seismicity , 2004 .

[10]  N. N. Ambraseys,et al.  The Seismic Activity of the Marmara Sea Region over the Last 2000 Years , 2002 .

[11]  A. Rubin,et al.  Streaks of microearthquakes along creeping faults , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Ross D. Hartleb,et al.  The Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the 17 August 1999 İzmit Earthquake (M 7.4), North Anatolian Fault , 2002 .

[13]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Earthquake losses due to ground failure , 2004 .

[14]  C. Scholz The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes , 1968 .

[15]  P. Malin,et al.  The SAFOD Pilot Hole seismic array: Wave propagation effects as a function of sensor depth and source location , 2004 .

[16]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Structure and Properties of the San Andreas Fault in Central California: Recent Results from the SAFOD Experiment , 2007 .

[17]  Lucile M. Jones,et al.  Parkfield earthquake prediction scenarios and response plans , 1986 .

[18]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Source analysis of acoustic emissions in Aue granite cores under symmetric and asymmetric compressive loads , 1998 .

[19]  D. Lockner,et al.  Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite , 1991, Nature.

[20]  A. McGarr On a possible connection between three major earthquakes in California and oil production , 1991 .

[21]  G. Dresen,et al.  Fracture process zone in granite: a microstructural analysis , 2001 .

[22]  Georg Dresen,et al.  Strain partitioning and stress rotation at the North Anatolian fault zone from aftershock focal mechanisms of the 1999 Izmit Mw= 7.4 earthquake , 2006 .

[23]  Seismological Studies at Parkfield VIII: Modeling the Observed Travel-Time Changes , 2000 .

[24]  H. C. Heard Flow and fracture of rocks , 1972 .

[25]  R. Armijo,et al.  The mechanical interaction between the propagating North Anatolian Fault and the back-arc extension in the Aegean , 2004 .

[26]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  The Seismicity in the Eastern Marmara Sea after the 17 August 1999 İzmit Earthquake , 2002 .

[27]  Mustafa Aktar,et al.  The 1999 İzmit Earthquake Sequence in Turkey: Seismological and Tectonic Aspects , 2002 .

[28]  James T. Rutledge,et al.  Induced microearthquake patterns and oil-producing fracture systems in the Austin chalk , 1998 .

[29]  S. Baisch,et al.  Fault mechanisms of induced seismicity at the superdeep German Continental Deep Drilling Program (KTB) borehole and their relation to fault structure and stress field , 2004 .

[30]  James N. Albright,et al.  Subsurface Fracture Mapping Using Microearthquakes Detected During Primary Oil Production, Clinton County, Kentucky , 1994 .

[31]  Thomas V. McEvilly,et al.  Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes , 1984 .

[32]  J. F. Gibbs,et al.  Seismicity in the Rangely, Colorado, area: 1962-1970 , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[33]  B. V. Kostrov,et al.  Selfsimilar problems of propagation of shear cracks , 1964 .

[34]  C. Richter An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale , 1935 .

[35]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[36]  Jörn Davidsen,et al.  Scaling and universality in rock fracture. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[37]  W. K. Lee,et al.  Principles and applications of microearthquake networks , 1981 .

[38]  D. S. Collins,et al.  Seismic studies of rock fracture at the Underground Research Laboratory, Canada , 2001 .

[39]  R. Nadeau,et al.  Nonvolcanic Tremors Deep Beneath the San Andreas Fault , 2005, Science.

[40]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Joint inversion of gravity and arrival time data from Parkfield: New constraints on structure and hypocenter locations near the SAFOD drill site , 2004 .

[41]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Fracture process zone in granite , 2000 .

[42]  D. Lockner The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture , 1993 .

[43]  O. Nishizawa,et al.  Fractal Structure of the Hypocenter Distributions and Focal Mechanism Solutions of Acoustic Emission in Two Granites of Different Grain Sizes , 1992 .

[44]  Yasuhiro Namba,et al.  Engineering Specifications on LTBMS Telemetry System for NanTroSEIZE 3.5 km Riser Hole , 2008 .

[45]  Shuichi Kodaira,et al.  Splay Fault Branching Along the Nankai Subduction Zone , 2002, Science.

[46]  Felix Waldhauser,et al.  Fault structure and mechanics of the Hayward Fault, California, from double-difference earthquake locations , 2002 .

[47]  M. Zoback,et al.  Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: Implications for crustal strength , 1997 .

[48]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Double-Difference Tomography: The Method and Its Application to the Hayward Fault, California , 2003 .

[49]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction scenarios and response plans , 1987 .

[50]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  The Parkfield, California, Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1985, Science.

[51]  G. Dresen,et al.  Quartz dislocation microstructure between 7000 m and 9100 m depth from the Continental Deep Drilling Program KTB , 1997 .

[52]  M. Kikuchi,et al.  Source rupture processes of the 1944 Tonankai earthquake and the 1945 Mikawa earthquake derived from low-gain seismograms , 2003 .

[53]  William Walden Rubey,et al.  The Denver EarthquakeS. , 1968, Science.

[54]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Induced Microearthquake Patterns in Hydrocarbon and Geothermal Reservoirs: Six Case Studies , 2002 .

[55]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  High‐resolution image of Calaveras Fault seismicity , 2002 .

[56]  Eser Durukal,et al.  Empirical ground‐motion prediction equations for northwestern Turkey using the aftershocks of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake , 2007 .

[57]  Georg Dresen,et al.  Acoustic emission and velocities associated with the formation of compaction bands in sandstone , 2006 .

[58]  G. Dresen,et al.  Drilling the North Anatolian Fault , 2007 .

[59]  R. H. Jones,et al.  A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes , 1997 .

[60]  J. Lauterjung,et al.  The German Continental Deep Drilling Program KTB: Overview and major results , 1997 .

[61]  Ruth A. Harris,et al.  The 2004 Parkfield Earthquake and the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 2006 .

[62]  R. Simpson,et al.  San Andreas Fault Geometry in the Parkfield, California, Region , 2006 .

[63]  A. Barka,et al.  The 17 August 1999 Izmit Earthquake , 1999, Science.

[64]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  Source parameters of injection-induced microearthquakes at 9 km depth at the KTB Deep Drilling site, Germany , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[65]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  A model for fluid-injection-induced seismicity at the KTB, Germany , 2003 .

[66]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake , 2005, Nature.

[67]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Seismology inside the Fault Zone: Applications to Fault-Zone Properties and Rupture Dynamics , 2007 .

[68]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering , 1997 .

[69]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Seismicity of the Earth , 1941 .

[70]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Ultrasonic Velocities, Acoustic Emission Characteristics and Crack Damage of Basalt and Granite , 2006 .

[71]  O. Nishizawa,et al.  Quasi‐static fault growth and cracking in homogeneous brittle rock under triaxial compression using acoustic emission monitoring , 2000 .

[72]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Amplitudes of surface waves and magnitudes of shallow earthquakes , 1945 .

[73]  David M. Evans The Denver Area Earthquakes and The Rocky Mountain Arsenal Disposal Well , 1966 .

[74]  J. Langbein,et al.  Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over Two Earthquake Cycles, and the Implications for Seismic Hazard , 2006 .

[75]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Introduction to special section: Preparing for the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth , 2004 .

[76]  W Foxall,et al.  Clustering and Periodic Recurrence of Microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California , 1995, Science.

[77]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Optimizing Correlation Techniques for Improved Earthquake Location , 2004 .

[78]  J. Kasahara,et al.  A study of microearthquake seismicity and focal mechanisms within the Sea of Marmara (NW Turkey) using ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) , 2004 .

[79]  P. Malin,et al.  A Look Inside the San Andreas fault at Parkfield Through Vertical Seismic Profiling , 2003, Science.

[80]  M. Kinoshita,et al.  The IODP Nankai Trough Seismogenic Zone Experiment , 2007 .

[81]  A. Aydin,et al.  Using mechanical modeling to constrain fault geometries proposed for the northern Marmara Sea , 2005 .

[82]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  Injection-induced earthquakes and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany , 1997 .

[83]  Christian Beck,et al.  Submarine fault scarps in the Sea of Marmara pull‐apart (North Anatolian Fault): Implications for seismic hazard in Istanbul , 2005 .

[84]  R. Kovach Source mechanisms for Wilmington Oil Field, California, subsidence earthquakes , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[85]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Fine‐scale structure of the San Andreas fault zone and location of the SAFOD target earthquakes , 2004 .

[86]  G. Dresen,et al.  Acoustic emission, microstructure, and damage model of dry and wet sandstone stressed to failure , 1996 .

[87]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Three-Dimensional Compressional Wavespeed Model, Earthquake Relocations, and Focal Mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, Region , 2006 .

[88]  M. Zoback,et al.  Stress perturbations associated with active faults penetrated by boreholes: Possible evidence for near-complete stress drop and a new technique for stress magnitude measurement , 1994 .

[89]  W. S. Phillips,et al.  Faulting Induced by Forced Fluid Injection and Fluid Flow Forced by Faulting: An Interpretation of Hydraulic-Fracture Microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas , 2004 .

[90]  James N. Albright,et al.  Acoustic Emissions as a Tool for Hydraulic Fracture Location: Experience at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock Site , 1982 .

[91]  Bertrand Meyer,et al.  Asymmetric slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull‐apart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault? , 2001 .

[92]  P. Malin,et al.  Microearthquake Imaging of the Parkfield Asperity , 1989, Science.

[93]  L. Ceranna,et al.  Probing the Crust to 9-km Depth: Fluid-Injection Experiments and Induced Seismicity at the KTB Superdeep Drilling Hole, Germany , 2002 .

[94]  W. Prescott,et al.  Short-range distance measurements along the San Andreas fault system in central California, 1975 to 1979 , 1981 .

[95]  Fumihiko Imamura,et al.  Tsunamis in the Sea of Marmara - Historical documents for the past, models for the future , 2002 .

[96]  M. E. O'neill,et al.  Aftershocks of the 1966 Parkfield-Cholame, California, earthquake: A detailed study , 1970 .