Effects of manipulating relative and absolute motion information during observational learning of an aiming task

In the visual perception perspective of observational learning, the manipulation of relative and absolute motion information in visual demonstrations optimally directs learners’ search towards appropriate task solutions. We assessed the effect of emphasizing transformational information and removal of structural information using point-light kinematic displays in approximating the model’s relative motion patterns. Participants viewed computer-simulated point-light demonstrations or normal video demonstrations before and intermittently throughout 100 acquisition trials with knowledge of results on an underarm modified-dart aiming task. On the next day, all participants performed 20 retention trials without demonstrations. The kinematics of spatial and temporal coordination and control variables were examined relative to the model’s action, as well as performance scores. The results indicated that approximation of the model’s spatial and temporal coordination and control patterns was achieved after observation of either type of demonstrations. No differences were found in movement outcomes. In a second experiment, the effects of manipulating absolute motion information by slowmotion demonstrations were examined relative to real-time demonstrations. Real-time demonstrations led to a closer approximation to the model’s spatial and temporal coordination patterns and better outcome scores, contradicting predictions that slow-motion displays convey intact relative motion information. We speculate that the effect of visual demonstration speed on action perception and reproduction is a function of task constraints ‐ that is, novelty or familiarity of relative motion of demonstrated activities.

[1]  R. Emmerik,et al.  The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  S. Runeson,et al.  Visual perception of lifted weight. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Scully Visual perception of technical execution and aesthetic quality in biological motion , 1986 .

[4]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[5]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. Haase,et al.  Multivariate analysis of variance. , 1987 .

[7]  M. Gessaroli,et al.  The Analysis of Repeated Measures Designs Involving Multiple Dependent Variables , 1987 .

[8]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  Specificity of Task Constraints and Effects of Visual Demonstrations and Verbal Instructions in Directing Learners' Search During Skill Acquisition , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  J G Williams,et al.  Visual Demonstration and Movement Production: Effects of Timing Variations in a Model's Action , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  W. Sparrow,et al.  Using relative motion plots to measure changes in intra-limb and inter-limb coordination. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  D. Scully Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 1987 .

[12]  Movement imitation : some fundamental processes , 1985 .

[13]  J. Cutting,et al.  The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motions , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  G. Wood Data smoothing and differentiation procedures in biomechanics. , 1982, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[15]  D. Scully,et al.  Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstrations , 1998 .

[16]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[17]  K. Newell Coordination, Control and Skill , 1985 .

[18]  T D Albright,et al.  Visual motion perception. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.