Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial.

Digital subtraction radiography (DSR) has been shown to be a sensitive and specific method for the detection of small bony changes in periodontitis. The purpose of this study was to perform a multicenter validation of the DSR in human subjects. Seventeen subjects were enrolled at 3 centers. Feather-edged hydroxyapatite chips (approximately 1, 7 and 10 mg) were used to simulate osseous lesions. Bilateral radiographs were taken with and without chips. Geometry was standardized using a cephalostat and the order of radiographs was determined using a randomization plan. Radiographs were subtracted, lesions isolated, and quantified at a single center without knowledge of the randomization code or location of the chips used in each subject. The overall sensitivity and specificity in detecting 1 mg changes was 87.8% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity in detecting 7 mg and 10 mg chips was 100%. A strong linear relationship between actual lesion mass and calculated mass was observed (R2 = 0.94, slope = 0.98, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed by center. These data indicate that the DSR is a valid technique for the assessment of alveolar bone changes in multicenter trials.

[1]  R L Webber,et al.  X-ray image subtraction as a basis for assessment of periodontal changes. , 1982, Journal of periodontal research.

[2]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions. , 1983, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[3]  P. Waite,et al.  Use of digital radiography to demonstrate the potential of naproxen as an adjunct in the treatment of rapidly progressive periodontitis. , 1991, Journal of periodontal research.

[4]  E Hausmann,et al.  Subtraction radiography and computer assisted densitometric analyses of standardized radiographs. A comparison study with 125I absorptiometry. , 1985, Journal of periodontal research.

[5]  E Hausmann,et al.  Usefulness of Subtraction Radiography in the Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  R. L. Webber,et al.  Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography. , 1990, Journal of periodontal research.

[7]  H. McClure,et al.  Changes in cyclooxygenase metabolites in experimental periodontitis in Macaca mulatta. , 1989, Journal of periodontal research.

[8]  R. L. Webber,et al.  A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. , 1986, Journal of periodontal research.

[9]  M. Jeffcoat,et al.  Digital Subtraction Radiography for Longitudinal Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Change: Method and Validation , 1993, Advances in dental research.

[10]  A Tzukert,et al.  The effects of beam hardening on digital subtraction radiography. , 1989, Journal of periodontal research.

[11]  M S Reddy,et al.  Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. , 1987, Journal of periodontal research.