Using three levels in design of effective teacher-education tasks: The case of promoting conflicts with intuitive understandings in probability

This paper describes a three-level framework (technical, domain, and generic) which enables some generalisability across mathematics topics for effective teacher–education (TE) task design. It argues that TE tasks which encompass these levels increase preservice and inservice teachers’ interest because they transcend the particular mathematical focus and pedagogical activity within the TE tasks and enable translation to classrooms (technical), enhance the success of student learning (domain), and facilitate transfer to other topics (generic). The paper then uses the levels to analyse an effective probability task (based on circular spinners) which involves cognitive conflict between formal and intuitive probability at all three levels, namely, with regard to facilitating non-random results (technical), differences between probabilistic and deterministic mathematics and area and set models (domain), and non-prototypic exemplars and validation in probability experiments (generic). The paper concludes with reference to the power of effective TE tasks in showing how connectivity of mathematics (e.g., fractions and probability) requires similar connectivity in pedagogy.

[1]  Nik Pa,et al.  Research on Children's Conceptions of Fractions. , 1989 .

[2]  David Pagni.  Fractions and Decimals. , 2004 .

[3]  Annette R. Baturo.  Getting to know probability : a descriptive study of the cognitive processes employed by the year 12 students engaged on probability tasks , 1992 .

[4]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  The Development of Professional Developers: Learning to Assist Teachers in New Settings in New Ways , 1999 .

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[6]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[7]  Dave Pratt,et al.  How do Teachers Foster Students' Understanding of Probability? , 2005 .

[8]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Building Student Capacity for Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning: An Analysis of Mathematical Tasks Used in Reform Classrooms , 1996 .

[9]  Rina Hershkowitz,et al.  Visualization in Geometry--Two Sides of the Coin. , 1989 .

[10]  Mike Askew,et al.  Describing primary mathematics lessons observed in the Leverhulme Numeracy Research Programme: A qualitative framework , 2000 .

[11]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Mathematical Proficiency for All Students: Toward a Strategic Research and Development Program in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[12]  Anne S. Hawkins,et al.  Children's conceptions of probability — A psychological and pedagogical review , 1984 .

[13]  Annette R. Baturo.  Conflict Between Perception, Cognition and Validation as University Students Analyse the Probability of an Event , 2001 .

[14]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[15]  Annette R. Baturo.  Conflict between perception, cognition and validation as Year 12 and university students analyse the probability of an event , 2001 .

[16]  H. Freudenthal.  Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures , 1983 .

[17]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Rational number, ratio and proportion , 1992 .

[18]  Orit Zaslavsky,et al.  Seizing the Opportunity to Create Uncertainty in Learning Mathematics , 2005 .

[19]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[20]  H. Freudenthal.  Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .

[21]  E. Fischbein,et al.  The Evolution with Age of Probabilistic, Intuitively Based Misconceptions. , 1997 .

[22]  Thomas J. Cooper,et al.  Collaboration with Teachers to Improve Mathematics Learning: Pedagogy at Three Levels , 2006 .

[23]  E. Fischbein,et al.  The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children , 1975 .

[24]  D. Ball,et al.  The Subject Matter Preparation of Teachers. Issue Paper 89-4. , 1989 .