Function score-based technological trend analysis

Abstract This paper proposes a new method to quantitatively evaluate the relative importance of a functionality in a technological domain at a specific time, called function score. Based on the function score and actual demand for each functionality, we developed a framework to analyze dynamic functional trends in a technological domain. To test the proposed method, this paper conducted an empirical study using Genome sequencing technology. The result shows that most of the important functionalities in different periods are well identified by the function score. The trend analysis framework effectively visualizes the dynamic changes of importance and demand for functionalities in Genome sequencing, and the results were also found to be qualitatively acceptable. Therefore, the proposed trend analysis based on the function score is being proposed here as a novel useful for understanding the fundamental developmental trends that occur within a technological domain.

[1]  B. Chain,et al.  The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA , 2016, Genomics.

[2]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Technology forecasting by analogy-based on social network analysis: The case of autonomous vehicles , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[3]  Qianrui Li,et al.  Subject–action–object-based morphology analysis for determining the direction of technological change , 2016 .

[4]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Knowledge combination modeling: The measurement of knowledge similarity between different technological domains , 2015 .

[5]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[6]  Yoshiyuki Takeda,et al.  Tracking emerging technologies in energy research : toward a roadmap for sustainable energy , 2008 .

[7]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Technology structural implications from the extension of a patent search method , 2014, Scientometrics.

[8]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Identification of technology development trends based on subject–action–object analysis: The case of dye-sensitized solar cells , 2015 .

[9]  T. Dallman,et al.  Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[11]  Sandra Müller,et al.  Patent-Based Inventor Profiles as a Basis for Human Resource Decisions in Research and Development , 2005 .

[12]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  Development of patent roadmap based on technology roadmap by analyzing patterns of patent development , 2015 .

[13]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[14]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Deriving technology intelligence from patents: Preposition-based semantic analysis , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[15]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[16]  Önder Nomaler,et al.  Measuring knowledge persistence: a genetic approach to patent citation networks , 2014 .

[17]  C. Hutchison DNA sequencing: bench to bedside and beyond , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  J. Leker,et al.  Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT , 2011 .

[19]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[20]  Riccardo Apreda,et al.  Automatic extraction of function-behaviour-state information from patents , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[21]  Donghyun You,et al.  Developmental Trajectories in Electrical Steel Technology Using Patent Information , 2018, Sustainability.

[22]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[23]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Quantitative Identification of Technological Discontinuities , 2018, IEEE Access.

[24]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[25]  Rias J. van Wyk,et al.  Technology: A fundamental structure? , 2002 .

[26]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field , 2013, Scientometrics.

[27]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .

[28]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Automated extraction and visualization of information for technological intelligence and forecasting , 2002 .

[29]  Hyunseok Park,et al.  Factors affecting product innovation performance according to dynamics of environment: evidence from Korean high-tech enterprises in manufacturing sector , 2015, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[30]  S. Arts,et al.  Text matching to measure patent similarity , 2018 .

[31]  Xue Meng,et al.  Demand identification model of potential technology based on SAO structure semantic analysis: The case of new energy and energy saving fields , 2019, Technology in Society.

[32]  Nagarajan Raghavan,et al.  Hierarchical main path analysis to identify decompositional multi-knowledge trajectories , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[33]  Nagarajan Raghavan,et al.  Discovering business diversification opportunities using patent information and open innovation cases , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[34]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Data-Driven Platform Design: Patent Data and Function Network Analysis , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[36]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Function Based Design-by-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search , 2014 .

[37]  Cui Huang,et al.  An improved SAO network-based method for technology trend analysis: A case study of graphene , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[38]  Frank Tietze,et al.  Citations as a measure of technological impact: A review of forward citation-based measures , 2018, World Patent Information.

[39]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Navigating the innovation trajectories of technology by combining specialization score analyses for publications and patents: graphene and nano-enabled drug delivery , 2015, Scientometrics.

[40]  Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al.  Text mining techniques for patent analysis , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[41]  Doyeon Kim,et al.  Analyzing technology impact networks for R&D planning using patents: combined application of network approaches , 2014, Scientometrics.

[42]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  Development cell by cell. , 2018, Science.

[43]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identification of promising patents for technology transfers using TRIZ evolution trends , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[46]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  “Term clumping” for technical intelligence: A case study on dye-sensitized solar cells , 2014 .

[47]  Chao Yang,et al.  Requirement-oriented core technological components’ identification based on SAO analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[48]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[49]  Dongwoo Kang,et al.  An SAO-based text mining approach to building a technology tree for technology planning , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities , 2011, Scientometrics.

[51]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[52]  Douglas W. Oard,et al.  Textual Data Mining to Support Science and Technology Management , 2000, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[53]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Testing the science/technology relationship by analysis of patent citations of scientific papers after decomposition of both science and technology , 2017, Scientometrics.

[54]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  How to combine term clumping and technology roadmapping for newly emerging science & technology competitive intelligence: “problem & solution” pattern based semantic TRIZ tool and case study , 2014, Scientometrics.

[55]  Amy J. C. Trappey,et al.  Using patent data for technology forecasting: China RFID patent analysis , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[56]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[57]  Nicole Rusk,et al.  Cheap third-generation sequencing , 2009, Nature Methods.

[58]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis , 2005 .

[59]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Tracing Technological Development Trajectories: A Genetic Knowledge Persistence-Based Main Path Approach , 2016, PloS one.

[60]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Design-by-analogy: experimental evaluation of a functional analogy search methodology for concept generation improvement , 2015 .

[61]  Jonghwa Kim,et al.  Technology opportunity discovery (TOD) from existing technologies and products: A function-based TOD framework , 2015 .

[62]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Using function-based patent analysis to identify potential application areas of technology for technology transfer , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[63]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[64]  Marissa Fessenden,et al.  Technologies to watch in 2019 , 2019, Nature.

[65]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  TechNet: Technology semantic network based on patent data , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[66]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Investigating technology opportunities: the use of SAOx analysis , 2018, Scientometrics.

[67]  Changbae Mun,et al.  Structural decomposition of technological domain using patent co-classification and classification hierarchy , 2019, Scientometrics.

[68]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Functional technology foresight. A novel methodology to identify emerging technologies , 2016 .

[69]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[70]  Yoshiyuki Takeda,et al.  Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications , 2008 .

[71]  Nagarajan Raghavan,et al.  Quantitative identification of technological paradigm changes using knowledge persistence , 2019, PloS one.

[72]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Modeling of technological performance trends using design theory , 2016, Design Science.

[73]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[74]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identification and evaluation of corporations for merger and acquisition strategies using patent information and text mining , 2013, Scientometrics.

[75]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[76]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs , 2013, Scientometrics.

[77]  Anne M. Keuneke,et al.  Device representation-the significance of functional knowledge , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[78]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  Technical Functions: On the Use and Design of Artefacts , 2010 .

[79]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Quantitative Determination of Technological Improvement from Patent Data , 2015, PloS one.

[80]  Jianxi Luo,et al.  Measuring technological distance for patent mapping , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[81]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.