The effects of goal specificity and scaffolding on programming performance and self-regulation in game design

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of goal specificity and scaffolding on the programming performance and self-regulation of elementary students engaged in learning game design. This study recruited 232 students for the experimental activities. Two levels of goal specificity were employed: specific and nonspecific. Structuring and problematizing scaffolds were also used to support students in the process of learning. Our results reveal the following: (1) nonspecific goals and structuring scaffolds led to superior comprehension of programming, (2) nonspecific goals with problematizing scaffolds led to better problem-solving performance, (3) problematizing scaffolds were more effective than structuring scaffolds in the development of self-regulation behavior, and (4) nonspecific goals were more effective than specific goals in the promotion of resource management associated with self-regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Elisabeth R. Hayes,et al.  Making Computer Games and Design Thinking , 2008, Games Cult..

[2]  M. Levine,et al.  Effects of Goal Specificity on Means-Ends Analysis and Learning. , 1982 .

[3]  Fred Paas,et al.  The goal specificity effect on strategy use and instructional efficiency during computer-based scientific discovery learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Alexandru Spatariu,et al.  Metacognitive Prompts and Mental Multiplication: Analyzing Strategies with a Qualitative Lens , 2011 .

[5]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design , 2002 .

[6]  B. Burns,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology Goal Specificity Effects on Hypothesis Testing in Problem Solving , 2022 .

[7]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[8]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  D. Schunk.  Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning , 1990 .

[11]  Ruven E. Brooks.  Towards a theory of the cognitive processes in computer programming , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[13]  Peg A Ertmer,et al.  Open Learning Environments, Foundations, Methods, and Models , 2012 .

[14]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Programming rules: what do children understand? , 2001 .

[15]  S. Graham,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulation and Transcription Skills in Writing and Writing Development , 2000 .

[16]  Jakub Swacha,et al.  Computer game design classes: The students' and professionals' perspectives , 2010, Informatics Educ..

[17]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Achievement Goal Theory and Affect: An Asymmetrical Bidirectional Model , 2002 .

[18]  Sheila Danko,et al.  Disentangling Achievement Orientation and Goal Setting: Effects on Self-Regulatory Processes , 2003 .

[19]  Ed Smeets,et al.  Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[20]  B. Burns,et al.  Goal specificity and learning with a hypermedia program. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[21]  C. Wolters,et al.  The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. , 1999 .

[22]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[23]  Bernhard Schmitz,et al.  A plea for self-regulated learning as a process: Modelling, measuring and intervening , 2011 .

[24]  Diane Grayson,et al.  Learning to program and learning to teach programming: A closer look , 2006 .

[25]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  B. Zimmerman.  Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[27]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia , 2008 .

[28]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Impact of Goal Specificity on Strategy Use and the Acquisition of Problem Structure , 1996 .

[29]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: The impact of conceptual scaffolds , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Dennis Charsky,et al.  "Games are made for fun": Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Jakob Tholander,et al.  Children's Perspectives in a Game Programming Discourse , 2005 .

[32]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  MultiLogo: A Study of Children and Concurrent Programming , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[33]  D. Leutner,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning as a Competence Implications of Theoretical Models for Assessment Methods , 2008 .

[34]  Jill Denner,et al.  Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Scott Schaefer,et al.  Teaching computer game design and construction , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[36]  B. Burns,et al.  Goal Specificity and Learning with a Multimedia Program , 2000 .

[37]  Katie Salen,et al.  Gaming literacies: A game design study in action , 2007 .

[38]  Chih-Yung Chang,et al.  A self-regulated learning system with scaffolding support for self-regulated e/m-learning , 2005, ITRE 2005. 3rd International Conference on Information Technology: Research and Education, 2005..

[39]  B. Zimmerman.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview , 2002 .

[40]  Timothy E Goldsmith,et al.  Goal specificity and knowledge acquisition in statistics problem solving: Evidence for attentional focus , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Stuart A. Karabenick,et al.  Assessing Academic Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[42]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Self-Regulation through Goal Setting. ERIC/CASS Digest. , 2001 .

[43]  Karl Josef Klauer.  Teaching for analogical transfer as a means of improving problem-solving, thinking and learning , 1989 .

[44]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[45]  Inge Molenaar,et al.  The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[47]  Ming-Puu Chen,et al.  A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: The effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[50]  Judy Robertson,et al.  Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[51]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[52]  I. Molenaar,et al.  Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement , 2011 .

[53]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[54]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[55]  Fermín Torrano Montalvo,et al.  Self-regulated learning: current and future directions. , 2004 .

[56]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. , 1997 .

[57]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[58]  Inge Molenaar,et al.  Different forms of Scaffolding, Different Learning Outcomes , 2009, AIED.