The effect of antenna polarization and body morphology on the measurement uncertainty of a wearable multi-band distributed exposure meter

[1]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in Europe: Is there a generation gap? , 2018, Environment international.

[2]  Sam Agneessens,et al.  A Multi-Band Body-Worn Distributed Radio-Frequency Exposure Meter: Design, On-Body Calibration and Study of Body Morphology , 2018, Sensors.

[3]  Luc Martens,et al.  Comments on assessment of polarization dependence of body shadow effect on dosimetry measurements in 2.4GHz band , 2017, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  Victoria Ramos,et al.  Assessment of polarization dependence of body shadow effect on dosimetry measurements in 2.4 GHz band , 2017, Bioelectromagnetics.

[5]  J. Bolte.  Lessons learnt on biases and uncertainties in personal exposure measurement surveys of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with exposimeters. , 2016, Environment international.

[6]  Luc Martens,et al.  On‐body calibration and measurements using personal radiofrequency exposimeters in indoor diffuse and specular environments , 2016, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  Patrick Van Torre,et al.  A Personal, Distributed Exposimeter: Procedure for Design, Calibration, Validation, and Application , 2016, Sensors.

[8]  Enrique Arribas Garde,et al.  Using multiple exposimeters to evaluate the influence of the body when measuring personal exposition to radio frequency electromagnetic fields , 2015 .

[9]  Hendrik Rogier,et al.  Compact Personal Distributed Wearable Exposimeter , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[10]  Sam Agneessens,et al.  On-Body Calibration and Measurements Using a Personal, Distributed Exposimeter for Wireless Fidelity , 2015, Health physics.

[11]  J. Karpowicz,et al.  The Role of the Location of Personal Exposimeters on the Human Body in Their Use for Assessing Exposure to the Electromagnetic Field in the Radiofrequency Range 98–2450 MHz and Compliance Analysis: Evaluation by Virtual Measurements , 2015, BioMed research international.

[12]  E Tanghe,et al.  A formula for human average whole-body SARwb under diffuse fields exposure in the GHz region , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  J. Bolte,et al.  Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields , 2011, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study , 2010, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Influence of electromagnetic polarization on the whole-body averaged SAR in children for plane-wave exposures , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Assessment of induced radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in various anatomical human body models , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  S. Mazuelas,et al.  E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  Györgyi Kubinyi,et al.  Personal RF exposimetry in urban area , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[19]  Sam Agneessens,et al.  Coupled Eighth-Mode Substrate Integrated Waveguide Antenna: Small and Wideband With High-Body Antenna Isolation , 2018, IEEE Access.

[20]  Sam Agneessens,et al.  On-body calibration and processing for a combination of two radio-frequency personal exposimeters. , 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry.