Characterization of friction and speed effects and methods for detection of cochlear implant electrode tip fold-over

Perimodiolar electrode arrays for cochlear implant surgery present surgeons with challenges during their insertion into the cochlea. These challenges stem from the inherent flexibility of these arrays and the fragile intracochlear anatomy and has opened opportunities for high precision robotic systems. This paper investigates effects of insertion speed on insertion forces using perimodiolar electrode arrays in human temporal bones and complements previously published results on insertion force and speed relationships when using straight outer-wall electrode arrays. The paper presents a custom-made parallel robot equipped with a high resolution force/moment sensor as an insertion platform. Experimental results using 42 insertions in 8 temporal bones are analyzed and grouped by insertion speed. Our results show a reduction in insertion forces up to insertion speeds of 1 mm/s. The second aspect of this paper is the investigation of the feasibility of using insertion force and speed data to sense conditions predicting the onset of electrode tip fold over, a complication resulting in poor placement of electrode contacts. It is shown that tip folding can be detected by features taken from insertion force data when employing a support vector machine classifier. The capability to detect such errors in a procedure is a critical component to the development of a practical surgical tool.

[1]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Impact of the Insertion Speed of Cochlear Implant Electrodes on the Insertion Forces , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Detection of seizures in EEG signal using weighted locally linear embedding and SVM classifier , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems.

[3]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Model and parameter identification of friction during robotic insertion of cochlear-implant electrode arrays , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  Fluoroscopically Assisted Cochlear Implantation , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[6]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Comparative Study of Cochlear Damage With Three Perimodiolar Electrode Designs , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  A Model for Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion and Force Evaluation: Results with a New Electrode Design and Insertion Technique , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Force measurement of insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays in vitro: comparison of surgeon to automated insertion tool , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  J. Ding,et al.  Inroads Toward Robot-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Steerable Electrode Arrays , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[10]  W. Jatmiko,et al.  A comparative study on Daubechies Wavelet Transformation, Kernel PCA and PCA as feature extractors for arrhythmia detection using SVM , 2011, TENCON 2011 - 2011 IEEE Region 10 Conference.

[11]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion™ and HiFocus II™ electrodes , 2005, Hearing Research.

[12]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Algorithms and design considerations for robot assisted insertion of Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Fazel Naghdy,et al.  Force Application During Cochlear Implant Insertion: An Analysis for Improvement of Surgeon Technique , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  René H Gifford,et al.  Implications of Minimizing Trauma During Conventional Cochlear Implantation , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Effect of Different Lubricants on Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Forces , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  New Support Vector Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[17]  Jian Zhang,et al.  A Pilot Study of Robot-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Steerable Electrode Arrays , 2006, MICCAI.

[18]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Force of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Performed by a Robotic Insertion Tool: Comparison of Traditional Versus Advance Off-Stylet Techniques , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cochlear Implant Electrode Design for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2004, The Laryngoscope.