Identification of liquid-gas flow regime in a pipeline using gamma-ray absorption technique and computational intelligence methods

Abstract Liquid-gas flows in pipelines occur frequently in the mining, nuclear, and oil industry. One of the non-contact techniques useful for studying such flows is the gamma ray absorption method. An analysis of the signals from scintillation detectors allows us to determine the number of flow parameters and to identify the flow structure. In this work, four types of liquid-gas flow regimes as a slug, plug, bubble, and transitional plug – bubble were evaluated using computational intelligence methods. The experiments were carried out for water-air flow through a horizontal pipeline. A sealed Am-241 gamma ray source and a NaI(Tl) scintillation detector were used in the research. Based on the measuring signal analysis in the time domain, nine features were extracted which were used at the input of the classifier. Six computational intelligence methods (K-means clustering algorithm, single decision tree, probabilistic neural network, multilayer perceptron, radial basic function neural network and support vector machine) were used for a two-phase flow structure identification. It was found that all the methods give good recognition results for the types of flow examined. These results confirm the usefulness of gamma ray absorption in combination with artificial intelligence methods for liquid-gas flow regime classification.

[1]  Takaaki Ohishi,et al.  Performance comparison of artificial neural networks and expert systems applied to flow pattern identification in vertical ascendant gas-liquid flows , 2010 .

[2]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[3]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[4]  Fatin Aliah Phang,et al.  Single-Plane Dual-Modality Tomography for Multiphase Flow Imaging by Integrating Electrical Capacitance and Ultrasonic Sensors , 2017, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[5]  Ruzairi Abdul Rahim,et al.  Measurement and analysis of water/oil multiphase flow using Electrical Capacitance Tomography sensor , 2016 .

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity , 1994 .

[7]  Joseph N. Gray,et al.  An X-ray system for visualizing fluid flows , 2008 .

[8]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  R. Hanus,et al.  Signals features extraction in liquid-gas flow measurements using gamma densitometry. Part 1: time domain , 2016 .

[10]  C. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of multiphase flows using dual-energy gamma densitometry and neural networks , 1993 .

[11]  Qincheng Bi,et al.  Recognition and measurement in the flow pattern and void fraction of gas–liquid two-phase flow in vertical upward pipes using the gamma densitometer , 2013 .

[12]  Seyed Amir Hossein Feghhi,et al.  Optimization of a method for identifying the flow regime and measuring void fraction in a broad beam gamma-ray attenuation technique , 2016 .

[13]  R. Schirru,et al.  Flow regime identification and volume fraction prediction in multiphase flows by means of gamma-ray attenuation and artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[14]  Rainer Hoffmann,et al.  Estimation of volume fractions and flow regime identification in multiphase flow based on gamma measurements and multivariate calibration , 2012 .

[15]  Gioia Falcone,et al.  Multiphase Flow Metering: Principles and Applications , 2009 .

[16]  Eslam Nazemi,et al.  Flow regime independent volume fraction estimation in three-phase flows using dual-energy broad beam technique and artificial neural network , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[17]  Geir Anton Johansen,et al.  Determination of void fraction and flow regime using a neural network trained on simulated data based on gamma-ray densitometry , 1999 .

[18]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Particle distribution in dilute solid liquid unbaffled tanks via a novel laser sheet and image analysis based technique , 2013 .

[19]  Robert Hanus,et al.  Application of the Hilbert Transform to measurements of liquid–gas flow using gamma ray densitometry , 2015 .

[20]  Seyed Amir Hossein Feghhi,et al.  Investigation of using 60Co source and one detector for determining the flow regime and void fraction in gas–liquid two-phase flows , 2016 .

[21]  Sheng Chen,et al.  Experiments with repeating weighted boosting search for optimization signal processing applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[22]  Herlina Abdul Rahim,et al.  Optical tomography: Velocity profile measurement using orthogonal and rectilinear arrangements , 2012 .

[23]  S. M. Ghiaasiaan,et al.  Artificial neural network approach for flow regime classification in gas–liquid–fiber flows based on frequency domain analysis of pressure signals , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[25]  Jerome H. Friedman,et al.  A Recursive Partitioning Decision Rule for Nonparametric Classification , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[26]  Ting Xue,et al.  Three-dimensional feature parameters measurement of bubbles in gas–liquid two-phase flow based on virtual stereo vision , 2012 .

[27]  R. Hanus,et al.  Application of gamma densitometry and statistical signal analysis to gas phase velocity measurements in pipeline hydrotransport , 2015 .

[28]  Philip J. Stone,et al.  Experiments in induction , 1966 .

[29]  Seyed Amir Hossein Feghhi,et al.  Flow regime identification and void fraction prediction in two-phase flows based on gamma ray attenuation , 2015 .

[30]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[31]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Top 10 algorithms in data mining , 2007, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[32]  Hoi Yeung,et al.  Non-invasive classification of gas–liquid two-phase horizontal flow regimes using an ultrasonic Doppler sensor and a neural network , 2016 .

[33]  H. Yeung,et al.  Investigation of the exploitation of a fast-sampling single gamma densitometer and pattern recognition to resolve the superficial phase velocities and liquid phase water cut of vertically upward multiphase flows , 2008 .

[34]  G. H. Roshani,et al.  Volume fraction measurement and flow regime recognition in dynamic gas–liquid two phase flow using gamma ray radiation technique , 2017 .

[35]  M. Roshani,et al.  A novel method for flow pattern identification in unstable operational conditions using gamma ray and radial basis function. , 2017, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[36]  Robert L. Powell,et al.  Experimental techniques for multiphase flows , 2008 .