Simulating fuel assemblies with low resolution CFD approaches

Abstract In addition to the traditional fuel assembly simulations using system codes, subchannel codes or porous medium approaches, as well as detailed CFD simulations to analyze single sub channels, a Low Resolution Geometry Resolving (LRGR) CFD approach and a Coarse-Grid-CFD (CGCFD) approach are taken. Both methods are based on a low resolution mesh that allows the capture of large and medium scale flow features such as recirculation zones, which are difficult to be reproduced by the system codes, subchannel codes and porous media approaches. The LRGR approach allows for instance fine-tuning the porous parameters which are important input for a porous medium approach. However, it should be noted that the prediction of detailed flow features such as secondary flows (small flows in the direction perpendicular to the main flow) is not feasible. Using this approach, the consequences of flow blockages for detection possibilities and cladding temperatures can be discussed. The goal of the CGCFD approach with SGM is that it can be applied to simulate complete fuel assemblies or even complete cores capturing the unique features of the complex flow induced by the fuel assembly geometry and its spacers. In such a case, grids with a very low grid resolution are employed. Within the CGCFD a subgrid model (SGM) accounts for sub grid volumetric forces which are derived from validated CFD simulations. The volumetric forces take account of the non resolved physics due to the coarse mesh. The current paper discusses and presents both, the CGCFD and the LRGR approaches.

[1]  Eckart Laurien,et al.  European supercritical water cooled reactor , 2011 .

[2]  P. Chellapandi,et al.  A comparative CFD investigation of helical wire-wrapped 7, 19 and 37 fuel pin bundles and its extendibility to 217 pin bundle , 2009 .

[3]  G. Grötzbach Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA 7363 Anisotropy and Buoyancy in Nuclear Turbulent Heat Transfer – Critical Assessment and Needs for Modelling , 2007 .

[4]  Rui Hu,et al.  Intermediate-resolution method for thermal-hydraulics modeling of a wire-wrapped pin bundle. , 2010 .

[5]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  CFD and DNS methodologies development for fuel bundle simulations , 2006 .

[6]  R. Meyder Turbulent velocity and temperature distribution in the central subchannel of rod bundles , 1975 .

[7]  T. Kajishima,et al.  Analysis of dynamical flow structure in a square arrayed rod bundle , 2010 .

[8]  D. Struwe,et al.  European lead fast reactor—ELSY , 2011 .

[9]  Ferry Roelofs,et al.  A stepwise development and validation of a RANS based CFD modelling approach for the hydraulic and thermal-hydraulic analyses of liquid metal flow in a fuel assembly , 2009 .

[10]  K. Rehme,et al.  Large eddy simulation and measurement of the structure of turbulence in two rectangular channels connected by a gap , 1996 .

[11]  Andrew Siegel,et al.  RANS-based CFD simulations of wire-wrapped fast reactor fuel assemblies , 2008 .

[12]  L. Meyer,et al.  Measurements of turbulent velocity and temperature in axial flow through a heated rod bundle , 1994 .

[13]  Stavros Tavoularis,et al.  Simulations of turbulence, heat transfer and mixing across narrow gaps between rod-bundle subchannels , 2008 .