Connectionist Models in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience : Critical Periods and the Paradox of Success

Connectionist models have made significant contributions to understanding developmental phenomena, mainly by providing novel computational accounts of behavioral emergence and change. What is the fate of such models given the increasing interest in and information about the biological bases of development? We consider this issue with respect to the classical idea of a critical period for acquiring language. The standard view is that neurobiological developments on a strict maturational timetable create limits on language learning capacity. Computational analysis suggests the opposite: that learning itself creates neurobiological conditions underlying the “closing” of the critical period. The critical period example suggests how connectionist models can continue to provide a necessary level of analysis intermediate between behavior and brain. Seidenberg & Zevin 3

[1]  J. Haldane The interaction of nature and nurture. , 1946, Annals of eugenics.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The Creation of a Communication System: A Study of Deaf Children of Hearing Parents , 2013 .

[4]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky , 1980 .

[6]  P. Kiparsky From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology , 1982 .

[7]  Karl Conrad Diller,et al.  Individual Differences & Universals in Language Learning Aptitude , 1982 .

[8]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Recovery from aphasia. , 1984, Advances in neurology.

[9]  J. Werker,et al.  Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[10]  P. Gordon Level-ordering in lexical development , 1985, Cognition.

[11]  James L. McClelland Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Cognition and Development , 1988 .

[12]  S. Pinker Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[13]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  The Cascade-Correlation Learning Architecture , 1989, NIPS.

[14]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Beyond the Input Given: The Child's Role in the Acquisition of Language , 1990 .

[16]  Peter M. Duppenthaler Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990 .

[17]  L. Gleitman,et al.  [Language and thought]. , 1991, La Revue du praticien.

[18]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar , 1991 .

[19]  F. Vargha-Khadem,et al.  A review of cognitive outcome after hemidecortication in humans. , 1992, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[21]  Betsy Bates,et al.  Modularity, Domain Specificity, and the Development of Language , 1994 .

[22]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  In Other Words: The Science and Psychology of Second-Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[23]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Phases of development in learning to read words by sight , 1995 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  C. ten Cate,et al.  Early experience and plasticity of song in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 1996 .

[26]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints , 1997, Science.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  M. Stryker,et al.  Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[30]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Words and rules , 1998 .

[31]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Flege Age of learning and second language speech. , 1999 .

[33]  H. Williams,et al.  Changes in adult zebra finch song require a forebrain nucleus that is not necessary for song production. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[34]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[35]  Nick Chater,et al.  Connectionist models of human language processing : Progress and prospects , 1999 .

[36]  Naoum P. Issa,et al.  The Critical Period for Ocular Dominance Plasticity in the Ferret’s Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback , 1999, Nature.

[38]  L. Maffei,et al.  BDNF Regulates the Maturation of Inhibition and the Critical Period of Plasticity in Mouse Visual Cortex , 1999, Cell.

[39]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. , 1999 .

[40]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Development of ocular dominance columns in the absence of retinal input , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  N. Chater,et al.  Computational models and Rethinking innateness , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[43]  A. Doupe,et al.  Interruption of a basal ganglia–forebrain circuit prevents plasticity of learned vocalizations , 2000, Nature.

[44]  L. Petitto,et al.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967, Neurology.

[45]  M. Fagiolini,et al.  Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex , 2000, Nature.

[46]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Age at Deafening Affects the Stability of Learned Song in Adult Male Zebra Finches , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  M Dennis,et al.  Developmental plasticity in children: the role of biological risk, development, time, and reserve. , 2000, Journal of communication disorders.

[48]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  M P Stryker,et al.  Emergence of ocular dominance columns in cat visual cortex by 2 weeks of age , 2001, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition , 2001 .

[51]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  J B Poline,et al.  Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: can a second language replace the first? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[53]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[54]  R. Mayberry,et al.  Development: Linguistic ability and early language exposure , 2002, Nature.

[55]  Ann Senghas,et al.  Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language , 2003 .

[56]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  Jean K. Gordon,et al.  Learning to divide the labor: an account of deficits in light and heavy verb production , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Takao K. Hensch,et al.  Controlling the critical period , 2003, Neuroscience Research.

[59]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connectionist models of development , 2003 .

[60]  Janet S. Oh,et al.  Holding on to childhood language memory , 2003, Cognition.

[61]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Précis of Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. , 2003, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[62]  E. Newport,et al.  When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[64]  J. Elman,et al.  Learnability and the Statistical Structure of Language: Poverty of Stimulus Arguments Revisited , 2004 .

[65]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Limits on Reacquisition of Song in Adult Zebra Finches Exposed to White Noise , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.