An Exploratory Clinical Trial of a Novel Treatment for Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi Combining Inactivated Autologous Nevus Tissue by High Hydrostatic Pressure and a Cultured Epidermal Autograft: Study Protocol

Background Giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMNs) are large brown to black skin lesions that appear at birth and are associated with a risk of malignant transformation. It is often difficult to reconstruct large full-thickness skin defects after the removal of GCMNs. Objective To overcome this difficulty we developed a novel treatment to inactivate nevus tissue and reconstruct the skin defect using the nevus tissue itself. For this research, we designed an exploratory clinical study to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel treatment combining the engraftment of autologous nevus tissue inactivated by high hydrostatic pressurization with a cultured epidermal autograft (CEA). Methods Patients with congenital melanocytic nevi that were not expected to be closed by primary closure will be recruited for the present study. The target number of nevi is 10. The full-thickness nevus of the target is removed and pressurized at 200 MPa for 10 minutes. The pressurized and inactivated nevus is sutured to the original site. A small section of the patient’s normal skin is taken from around the nevus region and a CEA is prepared after a 3-week culturing process. The CEA is then grafted onto the engrafted inactivated nevus at four weeks after its retransplantation. The primary endpoint is the engraftment of the CEA at 8 weeks after its transplantation and is defined as being engrafted when the engraftment area of the inactivated nevus is 60% or more of the pretransplantation nevus area and when 80% or more of the transplanted inactivated nevus is epithelialized. Results The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kansai Medical University (No. 1520-2, January 5, 2016: version 1.3). The study opened for recruitment in February 2016. Conclusions This protocol is designed to show feasibility in delivering a novel treatment combining the engraftment of inactivated autologous nevus tissue and CEA. This is the first-in-man clinical trial of this treatment, and it should be a promising treatment of patients suffering from GCMN. Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network: UMIN000020732; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022198 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6jLZH2vDN)

[1]  T. Fujisato,et al.  Verification of the Inactivation of Melanocytic Nevus in vitro Using a Newly Developed Portable High Hydrostatic Pressure Device , 2016, Cells Tissues Organs.

[2]  JinnoChizuru,et al.  Inactivation of Human Nevus Tissue Using High Hydrostatic Pressure for Autologous Skin Reconstruction: A Novel Treatment for Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi , 2015 .

[3]  T. Fujisato,et al.  Preparation of Inactivated Human Skin Using High Hydrostatic Pressurization for Full-Thickness Skin Reconstruction , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  A. Malovini,et al.  Long‐term in vivo assessment of bioengineered skin substitutes: a clinical study , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[5]  T. Fujisato,et al.  The Rapid Inactivation of Porcine Skin by Applying High Hydrostatic Pressure without Damaging the Extracellular Matrix , 2015, BioMed research international.

[6]  Jong-wook Lee,et al.  Contracture of skin graft in human burns: effect of artificial dermis. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[7]  F. Bernard,et al.  Epidermal Healing in Burns: Autologous Keratinocyte Transplantation as a Standard Procedure: Update and Perspective , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[8]  Hideaki Ito,et al.  Experience of Using Cultured Epithelial Autografts for the Extensive Burn Wounds in Eight Patients , 2014, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  R. Zuker,et al.  The Shifting Paradigm in the Management of Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi: Review and Clinical Applications , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  S. Mordon,et al.  Comparison of five dermal substitutes in full-thickness skin wound healing in a porcine model. , 2012, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[11]  M. Bekerecioğlu,et al.  Comparison of Classification Systems for Congenital Melanocytic Nevi , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[12]  J. Schaffer,et al.  Congenital melanocytic nevi-when to worry and how to treat: Facts and controversies. , 2010, Clinics in dermatology.

[13]  S. E. James,et al.  A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  W. Mooi,et al.  Risk of Malignant Transformation of Congenital Melanocytic Nevi: A Retrospective Nationwide Study from the Netherlands , 2005, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[15]  M. Mihm,et al.  Congenital melanocytic nevi: clinical and histopathologic features, risk of melanoma, and clinical management. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[16]  K. Chung,et al.  Risk of Melanoma Arising in Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevi: A Systematic Review , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  H. Green,et al.  Seria cultivation of strains of human epidemal keratinocytes: the formation keratinizin colonies from single cell is , 1975, Cell.