Tracking conformational states in allosteric transitions of phosphorylase.

An intrinsic molecular property of a protein domain can be determined by calculating its principal axes from the inertia tensor matrix. The mass-weighted principal axes can be used to calculate an ellipsoid representing the shape of the protein domain, providing an easy means of visualizing domain movements. Most importantly, the mass-weighted principal axes provide an intuitive means of characterizing domain relationships within a protein, as well as the disposition of domains in different protein conformers. Thus, this method provides a simple, quantitative description of differences of domain positions within various protein structures. We show the utility of this method by characterizing the quaternary and tertiary differences as observed in eight structures of phosphorylated or dephosphorylated glycogen phosphorylase with different effectors bound. This analysis revealed domain movements which were characteristic of the activated phosphorylase structures. The monomers of the phosphorylase dimer were found to move apart by a 2.5-A translation and to rotate apart, in three orthogonal directions, by a minimum of 3.2 degrees. Analysis of the three domains within the phosphorylase monomer showed that both simple and complex domain movements occur and that multiple domain configurations are energetically stable. We suggest that the C-terminal domain of phosphorylase moves along a simple path in the transition from an inactive to active conformation. The direction of translation and rotation is consistent, but the magnitude is variable. In contrast, this analysis showed that the activation domain did not behave as a rigid body, and therefore, the motion of this domain is not as easily characterized.

[1]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Phosphorylase: a biological transducer. , 1992, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  J. Kraut,et al.  Crystal structure of unliganded Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Ligand-induced conformational changes and cooperativity in binding. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[3]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structural basis for the activation of glycogen phosphorylase b by adenosine monophosphate. , 1991, Science.

[4]  L. Johnson,et al.  The allosteric transition of glycogen phosphorylase , 1989, Nature.

[5]  S. Sprang,et al.  Domain separation in the activation of glycogen phosphorylase a. , 1989, Science.

[6]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structural changes in glycogen phosphorylase induced by phosphorylation , 1988, Nature.

[7]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structure of the nucleotide activation switch in glycogen phosphorylase a. , 1987, Science.

[8]  M G Rossmann,et al.  Comparison of protein structures. , 1985, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  William R. Taylor,et al.  An ellipsoidal approximation of protein shape , 1983 .

[10]  S. Sprang,et al.  Structure of maltoheptaose by difference Fourier methods and a model for glycogen. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Wayne A. Hendrickson,et al.  Transformations to optimize the superposition of similar structures , 1979 .

[12]  R. Fletterick,et al.  X-ray crystallographic and kinetic studies of oligosaccharide binding to phosphorylase. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  N. Madsen,et al.  Activity of glycogen phosphorylase in the crystalline state. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  P Argos,et al.  A comparison of the heme binding pocket in globins and cytochrome b5. , 1975, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.