Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Although there are several new designs for phase I cancer clinical trials including the continual reassessment method and accelerated titration design, the traditional algorithm-based designs, like the '3 + 3' design, are still widely used because of their practical simplicity. In this paper, we study some key statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs in a general framework and derive the exact formulae for the corresponding statistical quantities. These quantities are important for the investigator to gain insights regarding the design of the trial, and are (i) the probability of a dose being chosen as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); (ii) the expected number of patients treated at each dose level; (iii) target toxicity level (i.e. the expected dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) incidences at the MTD); (iv) expected DLT incidences at each dose level and (v) expected overall DLT incidences in the trial. Real examples of clinical trials are given, and a computer program to do the calculation can be found at the authors' website approximately linyo" locator-type="url">http://www2.umdnj.edu/ approximately linyo.

[1]  T. Taguchi,et al.  [Phase I study]. , 1995, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[2]  B E Storer,et al.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. , 1989, Biometrics.

[3]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Phase I trial design: are new methodologies being put into practice? , 1996, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  L. Edler Statistical requirements of phase I studies. , 1990, Onkologie.

[5]  J Whitehead,et al.  Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  S Zacks,et al.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  B. Carlin,et al.  Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  L V Rubinstein,et al.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  J. Lee,et al.  Design and results of phase I cancer clinical trials: three-year experience at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.