A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in The Netherlands.

In response to increasing use of the subsurface, there is a need to modernise policies on sustainable use of the subsurface. This holds in particular for the densely populated Netherlands. We aimed to analyse current practice of subsurface management and the associated pressure points and to establish a conceptual overview of the technical issues related to sustainable management of the subsurface. Case studies on the exploitation of subsurface resources (including spatial use of the subsurface) were analysed, examining social relevance, environmental impact, pressure points and management solutions. The case studies ranged from constructing underground garages to geothermal exploitation. The following issues were identified for the technological/scientific aspects: site investigation, suitability, risk assessment, monitoring and measures in the event of failure. Additionally, the following general issues were identified for the administrative aspects: spatial planning, option assessment, precaution, transparency, responsibility and liability. These issues were explored on their technological implications within the framework of sustainable management of the subsurface. This resulted into the following key aspects: (1) sustainability assessment, (2) dealing with uncertainty and (3) policy instruments and governance. For all three aspects, different options were identified which might have a legal, economic or ethical background. The technological implications of these backgrounds have been identified. A set of recommendations for sustainable management of the subsurface resources (incl. space) was established: (1) management should be driven by scarcity, (2) always implement closed loop monitoring when the subsurface activities are high-risk, (3) when dealing with unknown features and heterogeneity, apply the precautionary principle, (4) responsibility and liability for damage must be set out in legislation and (5) sustainability should be incorporated in all relevant legislation and not only in environmental legislation. Other aspects to be considered are the reversibility of the impacts from subsurface activities and the abandonment of installations.

[1]  J. Schmandt.  Bringing sustainability science to water basin management , 2006 .

[2]  Brent Miyazaki,et al.  Well integrity: An overlooked source of risk and liability for underground natural gas storage. Lessons learned from incidents in the USA , 2009 .

[3]  D. Yates,et al.  WEAP21—A Demand-, Priority-, and Preference-Driven Water Planning Model , 2005 .

[4]  Konstantinos Evangelinos,et al.  A SWOT analysis of environmental management practices in Greek Mining and Mineral Industry , 2010 .

[5]  Jagath J. Kaluarachchi,et al.  Probabilistic risk assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis for the management of contaminated subsurface , 2003 .

[6]  Michael H. Stephenson,et al.  The present and future use of ‘land’ below ground , 2009 .

[7]  T. Hámor.  Sustainable Mining in the European Union: The Legislative Aspect , 2004, Environmental management.

[8]  Sangam Shrestha,et al.  A framework for measuring groundwater sustainability , 2011 .

[9]  Gerd Winter,et al.  Weighing up the EC Environmental Liability Directive , 2008 .

[10]  E. Paleologos.  The Lost Value of Groundwater and its Influence on Environmental Decision Making , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  G. Frapporti,et al.  Statistical analysis of anthropogenic versus geochemical-controlled differences in groundwater composition in The Netherlands , 2007 .

[12]  I. Kroon,et al.  The effective subsidence capacity concept: How to assure that subsidence in the Wadden Sea remains within defined limits? , 2012, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[13]  J. Gun,et al.  Groundwater around the World: A Geographic Synopsis , 2013 .

[14]  Lukas Ferkl,et al.  Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels , 2011 .

[15]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Chapter 4.4:Linking Public Participation to Adaptive Management , 2007 .

[16]  G. Tiess.  Minerals policy in Europe: Some recent developments , 2010 .

[17]  G. Axelsson.  Sustainable geothermal utilization – Case histories; definitions; research issues and modelling , 2010 .

[18]  M. Taniguchi,et al.  Towards Sustainable Groundwater Use: Setting Long‐Term Goals, Backcasting, and Managing Adaptively , 2012, Ground water.

[19]  H. Bruining,et al.  Exergy analysis of underground coal gasification with simultaneous storage of carbon dioxide , 2012 .

[20]  Bernadette O’Regan,et al.  Using system dynamics to model the interaction between environmental and economic factors in the mining industry , 2006 .

[21]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Integrated water resources management: Concepts and issues , 2008 .

[22]  M. Meulen.  Sustainable mineral development: possibilities and pitfalls illustrated by the rise and fall of Dutch mineral planning guidance , 2005 .

[23]  P. Quevauviller.  Groundwater science and policy: an international overview. , 2007 .

[24]  Vincent C Tidwell,et al.  Cooperative modeling: linking science, communication, and ground water planning. , 2008, Ground water.

[25]  Barry Ness,et al.  Structuring problems in sustainability science: The multi-level DPSIR framework , 2010 .

[26]  Jagath J Kaluarachchi,et al.  Sustainability of ground water quality considering land use changes and public health risks. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  A. Mittelstet,et al.  Comparison of Aquifer Sustainability Under Groundwater Administrations in Oklahoma and Texas 1 , 2011 .

[28]  Ton Wildenborg,et al.  Bow-tie risk assessment combining causes and effects applied to gasoil storage in an abandoned salt cavern, , 2014 .

[29]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure , 2006 .

[30]  T. Prior,et al.  Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management , 2012 .

[31]  H.R.G.K. Hack,et al.  Manuscript for a book on Sustainable Development and Management of the Subsurface , 2005 .

[32]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making , 2012 .

[33]  The Energy-Water Nexus Underground Thermal Energy Storage : Environmental Risks and Policy Developments in the Netherlands and European Union , 2011 .

[34]  A. Leddin,et al.  Perspectives on mineral policy in Ireland , 2005 .

[35]  Nikolaos Voulvoulis,et al.  From chemical risk assessment to environmental resources management: the challenge for mining , 2013, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  Fraser Dalgleish,et al.  Risk management: developing a framework for a water authority , 2005 .

[37]  J. Gun,et al.  Groundwater around the World: A Geographic Synopsis , 2013 .

[38]  Howard W. Reeves,et al.  Examining the contradiction in ‘sustainable urban growth’: an example of groundwater sustainability , 2012 .

[39]  Ibrahim M. Khadam,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water , 2003 .

[40]  Philipp Blum,et al.  Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy , 2013 .

[41]  Marios Sophocleous,et al.  The evolution of groundwater management paradigms in Kansas and possible new steps towards water sustainability , 2012 .

[42]  Annemarie P van Wezel,et al.  Societal Cost–Benefit Analysis for Soil Remediation in The Netherlands , 2008, Integrated environmental assessment and management.