Inspection Procedures for Effective GPR Sensing and Mapping of Underground Utilities and Voids, with a Focus to Urban Areas

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) has proved its ability to act as a powerful geophysical non-destructive tool for subsurface investigations. The remarkable technological developments have increased, among others, the practice of GPR in sensing and mapping utilities and voids. In particular, GPR is effectively used to locate and map objects such as pipes, drums, tanks, cables and underground features or to detect subsurface voids related to subsidence and erosion of ground materials. Furthermore, deploying GPR methods prior to directional drilling prevents damage to existing utilities, thus resulting in cost effective installations. In that frame, this paper presents some studies showing the GPR performances and limitations, from single-channel systems to the potential of multi-channel 3D imaging and integrating systems.

[1]  FrankK B. Holt,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of Pavements , 1987 .

[2]  Enes Yigit,et al.  Detection of Movement and Impedance Changes behind Surfaces Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2011 .

[3]  Andrea Massa,et al.  Imaging buried objects within the second-order Born approximation through a multiresolution-regularized inexact-Newton method , 2013, 2013 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory.

[4]  R M Morey,et al.  Ground penetrating radar for evaluating subsurface conditions for transportation facilities , 1998 .

[5]  Chih Sung Chen,et al.  Subsurface GPR imaging of a potential collapse area in urban environments , 2012 .

[6]  P. Rocca,et al.  Scattering data inversion through Interval Analysis under Rytov approximation , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[7]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  GPR applied to mapping utilities along the route of the Line 4 (yellow) subway tunnel construction in São Paulo City, Brazil , 2012 .

[8]  Manuel Benedetti,et al.  Multiple-Shape Reconstruction by Means of Multiregion Level Sets , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Leonardo Lizzi,et al.  Three-dimensional real-time localization of subsurface objects — From theory to experimental validation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  Paolo Rocca,et al.  Bayesian Compressive Sensing Approaches for the Reconstruction of Two-Dimensional Sparse Scatterers Under TE Illuminations , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  A. Massa,et al.  A Numerical Assessment of the Reconstruction Effectiveness of the Integrated GA-Based Multicrack Strategy , 2007, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[13]  Andrea Boni,et al.  A classification approach based on SVM for electromagnetic subsurface sensing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Yuejian Cao,et al.  Implementation of Ground Penetrating Radar , 2007 .

[15]  L. Bernold,et al.  A Multi-Sensory Approach to 3-D Mapping of Underground Utilities , 2002 .

[16]  Dimitri A Grivas.  Applications of Ground Penetrating Radar for Highway Pavements , 2006 .

[17]  Egil Eide,et al.  3D utility mapping using electronically scanned antenna array , 2002, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[18]  Nigel J. Cassidy,et al.  Void detection beneath reinforced concrete sections: The practical application of ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic techniques , 2011 .

[19]  Andrea Massa,et al.  Imaging sparse metallic cylinders through a local shape function Bayesian compressive sensing approach. , 2013, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Innovative process to characterize buried utilities using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2007 .