Advantage of storage in a fluctuating environment.

We will elaborate the evolutionary course of an ecosystem consisting of a population in a chemostat environment with periodically fluctuating nutrient supply. The organisms that make up the population consist of structural biomass and energy storage compartments. In a constant chemostat environment a species without energy storage always out-competes a species with energy reserves. This hinders evolution of species with storage from those without storage. Using the adaptive dynamics approach for non-equilibrium ecological systems we will show that in a fluctuating environment there are multiple stable evolutionary singular strategies (ss's): one for a species without, and one for a species with energy storage. The evolutionary end-point depends on the initial evolutionary state. We will formulate the invasion fitness in terms of Floquet multipliers for the oscillating non-autonomous system. Bifurcation theory is used to study points where due to evolutionary development by mutational steps, the long-term dynamics of the ecological system changes qualitatively. To that end, at the ecological time scale, the trait value at which invasion of a mutant into a resident population becomes possible can be calculated using numerical bifurcation analysis where the trait is used as the free parameter, because it is just a bifurcation point. In a constant environment there is a unique stable equilibrium for one species following the "competitive exclusion" principle. In contrast, due to the oscillatory dynamics on the ecological time scale two species may coexist. That is, non-equilibrium dynamics enhances biodiversity. However, we will show that this coexistence is not stable on the evolutionary time scale and always one single species survives.

[1]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Oscillations and chaos generated by competition for interactively essential resources , 2002, Ecological Research.

[2]  William Gurney,et al.  Experimental testing of dynamic energy budget models , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas G. Hallam,et al.  Modelling Individuals Employing an Integrated Energy Response: Application to Daphnia , 1990 .

[4]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[5]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[6]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[7]  Fabio Dercole,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of a Prey-Predator Coevolution Model , 2003, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[8]  Alessandra Gragnani,et al.  A Universal Bifurcation Diagram for Seasonally Perturbed Predator-Prey Models , 1995 .

[9]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[10]  B W Kooi,et al.  Resistance of a food chain to invasion by a top predator. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[11]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  C. Matessi,et al.  Long-term evolution of multilocus traits , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[13]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR OSCILLATIONS AND CHAOS GENERATED BY MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 2001 .

[14]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Energy storage and the evolution of population dynamics. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[16]  Y. Kuznetsov,et al.  Continuation techniques and interactive software for bifurcation analysis of ODEs and iterated maps: physics , 1993 .

[17]  S. M. Verduyn Lunel,et al.  Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems , 1996 .

[18]  B W Kooi,et al.  Bi-trophic food chain dynamics with multiple component populations , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[19]  B W Kooi,et al.  Discrete event versus continuous approach to reproduction in structured population dynamics. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  Barbara Boldin,et al.  Introducing a Population into a Steady Community: The Critical Case, the Center Manifold, and the Direction of Bifurcation , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[21]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[22]  Paul Waltman,et al.  The Theory of the Chemostat , 1995 .

[23]  Fabio Dercole,et al.  Remarks on branching-extinction evolutionary cycles , 2003, Journal of mathematical biology.

[24]  M. Droop SOME THOUGHTS ON NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN ALGAE 1 , 1973 .

[25]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Invading species can stabilize simple trophic systems , 2000 .

[26]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  A beginners guide to adaptive dynamics , 2002 .

[27]  Thomas F. Fairgrieve,et al.  AUTO 2000 : CONTINUATION AND BIFURCATION SOFTWARE FOR ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (with HomCont) , 1997 .

[28]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems , 2000 .

[29]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  G. Sayler,et al.  Complex dynamics in a model microbial system , 1992 .

[31]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence , 1995 .

[32]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.