The risks and bene fi ts of technologised sexual practice scale: a quantitative measure of technology facilitated sex and intimacy

Background . Technologies such as the Internet, smartphones, and sex toys have demonstrated the capacity to facilitate and enhance sexual and intimate practice by offering new ways to meet sexual partners, maintain and establish intimate connections, and providing access to sexual education and exposure to new ways of engaging in sex. They have also afforded novel risks to safety, privacy, and sexual autonomy. Understanding how people perceive and experience both the risks and bene fi ts of using technology to facilitate sex and intimacy is important to understanding contemporary sexual practice, health, and pleasure. However, research in this space is currently hampered by a lack of quantitative measures to accurately and holistically assess both the risks and bene fi ts in the context of technologised sexual practices. Methods . To facilitate a nuanced quantitative exploration of these concepts, we present the psychometric properties of the newly developed Risks and Bene fi ts of Technologised Sexual Practice Scale . Results . Using an exploratory (Study 1, n = 445) and con fi rmatory factor analysis (Study 2, n = 500), this paper presents evidence for a 6-factor scale (Bene fi ts (3): ‘ sexual grati fi cation ’ , ‘ connection ’ , and ‘ access to information and culture ’ ; Risks (3): ‘ concerns ’ , ‘ worries ’ , and ‘ knowledge of rights and ownership ’ ). Conclusion . This scale may be used to contribute to research areas including sexual health, sexual behaviour, sexual education, online connection, online safety, and digital literacy with the aim to contribute to a sex-and technology-positive framework for understanding sexual health and pleasure.

[1]  E. Cama Understanding Experiences of Sexual Harms Facilitated through Dating and Hook Up Apps among Women and Girls , 2021 .

[2]  S. Sammut,et al.  Compulsive Internet Pornography Use and Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Sample of University Students in the United States , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  V. Braun,et al.  The online survey as a qualitative research tool , 2020, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[4]  Andrea Waling,et al.  ‘It’s nice to be appreciated’: Understanding heterosexual men’s engagements with sexting and sharing Dick Pics , 2020, Sexualities.

[5]  A. Gesselman,et al.  Less Sex, but More Sexual Diversity: Changes in Sexual Behavior during the COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic , 2020, Leisure Sciences.

[6]  K. Albury,et al.  Dating apps as public health ‘problems’: cautionary tales and vernacular pedagogies in news media , 2020, Health sociology review : the journal of the Health Section of the Australian Sociological Association.

[7]  M. Lim,et al.  Sexual Behaviors and Violence in Pornography: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Video Content Analyses , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  E. Setty A Rights-Based Approach to Youth Sexting: Challenging Risk, Shame, and the Denial of Rights to Bodily and Sexual Expression Within Youth Digital Sexual Culture , 2019, International Journal of Bullying Prevention.

[9]  Anastasia Powell,et al.  Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Victimization: Results From an Online Survey of Australian Adults , 2019, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[10]  N. Henry,et al.  Image-Based Sexual Abuse: An Australian Reflection , 2019, Women & Criminal Justice.

[11]  Elena Maris,et al.  Tracking sex: The implications of widespread sexual data leakage and tracking on porn websites , 2019, New Media Soc..

[12]  Bianca Klettke,et al.  Sexting, Mental Health, and Victimization Among Adolescents: A Literature Review , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  J. Lucke,et al.  Australian students’ experiences of sexuality education at school , 2019, Sex Education.

[14]  Laura E. Barnes,et al.  "Is This an STD? Please Help!": Online Information Seeking for Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Reddit , 2018, ICWSM.

[15]  Diana C. Parry,et al.  “My iPhone Changed My Life”: How Digital Technologies Can Enable Women’s Consumption of Online Sexually Explicit Materials , 2018 .

[16]  Brady Robards,et al.  ‘Totally straight’: Contested sexual identities on social media site reddit , 2018 .

[17]  A. Scott,et al.  Revenge pornography: the influence of perpetrator-victim sex, observer sex and observer sexting experience on perceptions of seriousness and responsibility , 2017 .

[18]  C. McGlynn,et al.  Image-based sexual abuse. , 2017 .

[19]  Stephen Owen,et al.  Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy , 2017 .

[20]  C. Mercer,et al.  Finding sexual partners online: prevalence and associations with sexual behaviour, STI diagnoses and other sexual health outcomes in the British population , 2017, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[21]  F. Attwood,et al.  Mediated intimacies: bodies, technologies and relationships , 2017 .

[22]  C. McGlynn,et al.  Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse , 2017 .

[23]  Nicola Liberati,et al.  Teledildonics and New Ways of “Being in Touch”: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Use of Haptic Devices for Intimate Relations , 2016, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[24]  R. Geskus,et al.  Does online dating lead to higher sexual risk behaviour? A cross-sectional study among MSM in Amsterdam, the Netherlands , 2016, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[25]  R. das Nair,et al.  Pornography Addiction in Adults: A Systematic Review of Definitions and Reported Impact. , 2016, The journal of sexual medicine.

[26]  Michelle Drouin,et al.  Sexting: A new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Melissa G Burkett,et al.  Sex(t) Talk: A Qualitative Analysis of Young Adults’ Negotiations of the Pleasures and Perils of Sexting , 2015 .

[28]  J. DeVries,et al.  Analysis , 2015, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[29]  N. Henry,et al.  Beyond the ‘sext’: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women , 2015 .

[30]  V. Francisco,et al.  ‘The Internet Is Magic’: Technology, Intimacy and Transnational Families , 2015 .

[31]  K. Harden,et al.  A Sex-Positive Framework for Research on Adolescent Sexuality , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[32]  M. Chayko Techno‐social Life: The Internet, Digital Technology, and Social Connectedness , 2014 .

[33]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Safe sext: adolescents' use of technology to communicate about sexual health with dating partners. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[34]  Anne M Johnson,et al.  Framing sexual health research: adopting a broader perspective , 2013, The Lancet.

[35]  S. Angelides ‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’: The affective politics of teenage sexting , 2013 .

[36]  Amy Adele Hasinoff,et al.  Sexting as media production: Rethinking social media and sexuality , 2013, New Media Soc..

[37]  Rachel Grieve,et al.  Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Kate Crawford,et al.  Young People, Social Media, Social Network Sites and Sexual Health Communication in Australia: "This is Funny, You Should Watch It" , 2013 .

[39]  Dorothy Skierkowski,et al.  To text or not to text? The importance of text messaging among college-aged youth , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Nicola M. Döring,et al.  The Internet's impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Jonathan Pettigrew,et al.  Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships , 2009 .

[42]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[43]  R. Streitmatter Up from Invisibility: Lesbians, Gay Men, and the Media in America , 2002 .

[44]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[45]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[46]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  A. Dobson ‘The Things You Didn’t Do’: Gender, Slut-Shaming, and the Need to Address Sexual Harassment in Narrative Resources Responding to Sexting and Cyberbullying , 2019, Narratives in Research and Interventions on Cyberbullying among Young People.

[48]  Asher Flynn,et al.  Not Just 'Revenge Pornography': Australians' Experiences of Image-Based Abuse: A Summary Report , 2017 .

[49]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .