Optimization of what? For-profit health apps as manipulative digital environments

Mobile health applications (‘health apps’) that promise the user to help her with some aspect of her health are very popular: for-profit apps such as MyFitnessPal, Fitbit, or Headspace have tens of millions of users each. For-profit health apps are designed and run as optimization systems . One would expect that these health apps aim to optimize the health of the user, but in reality they aim to optimize user engagement and, in effect, conversion . This is problematic, I argue, because digital health environments that aim to optimize user engagement risk being manipulative. To develop this argument, I first provide a brief analysis of the underlying business models and the resulting designs of the digital environments provided by popular for-profit health apps. In a second step, I present a concept of manipulation that can help analyze digital environments such as health apps. In the last part of the article, I use my concept of manipulation to analyze the manipulative potential of for-profit health apps. Although for-profit health can certainly empower their users, the conditions for empowerment also largely overlap with the conditions for manipulation. As a result, we should be cautious when embracing the empowerment discourse surrounding health apps. An additional aim of this article is to contribute to the rapidly growing literature on digital choice architectures and the ethics of influencing behavior through such choice architectures. I take health apps to be a paradigmatic example of digital choice architectures that give rise to ethical questions, so my analysis of the manipulative potential of health apps can also inform the larger literature on digital choice architectures.

[1]  Marjolein Lanzing,et al.  The transparent self , 2016, Ethics and Information Technology.

[2]  J. Christman,et al.  Autonomy and Personal History , 1991, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[3]  D. Lupton.  Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies , 2013 .

[4]  Evan Selinger,et al.  Re-Engineering Humanity , 2018 .

[5]  Shlomo Cohen.  Manipulation and Deception , 2018 .

[6]  Nathaniel J. Evans,et al.  Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising , 2016 .

[7]  N. Stoljar.  Informed consent and relational conceptions of autonomy. , 2011, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[8]  L. Floridi.  The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  Rachel Sanders,et al.  Self-tracking in the Digital Era , 2017 .

[10]  R. Crawford,et al.  Health as a meaningful social practice , 2006, Health.

[11]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Btihaj Ajana,et al.  Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self , 2017, Digital health.

[13]  Bartosz W. Wojdynski,et al.  Building a Better Native Advertising Disclosure , 2017 .

[14]  D. Lupton.  M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society , 2012, Social Theory & Health.

[15]  D. Lupton,et al.  'I Just Want It to Be Done, Done, Done!' Food Tracking Apps, Affects, and Agential Capacities , 2018, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[16]  Karen Yeung,et al.  ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design , 2016, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[17]  Sarah Buss,et al.  Valuing Autonomy and Respecting Persons: Manipulation, Seduction, and the Basis of Moral Constraints* , 2005, Ethics.

[18]  K. O’Riordan,et al.  Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer , 2017 .

[19]  L. Nordenfelt.  Health and disease: two philosophical perspectives. , 1986, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[20]  R. Crisp.  Persuasive advertising, autonomy, and the creation of desire , 1987 .

[21]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Desire to Be Underweight: Exploratory Study on a Weight Loss App Community and User Perceptions of the Impact on Disordered Eating Behaviors , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[22]  D. Armstrong,et al.  The rise of surveillance medicine , 1995 .

[23]  Claudia Mills.  Manipulation as an Aesthetic Flaw , 2014 .

[24]  S. Racine,et al.  Research Review: What we have learned about the causes of eating disorders - a synthesis of sociocultural, psychological, and biological research. , 2015, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  J. Christman,et al.  Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves , 2004 .

[26]  A. Honneth,et al.  Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice , 2005 .

[27]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Technology, Autonomy, and Manipulation , 2019, Internet Policy Rev..

[28]  Nadine Bol,et al.  Health as a Means Towards Profitable Ends: mHealth Apps, User Autonomy, and Unfair Commercial Practices , 2018, Journal of Consumer Policy.

[29]  Anne Barnhill.  What Is Manipulation , 2014 .

[30]  Paul C. Santilli.  The informative and persuasive functions of advertising: A moral appraisal , 1983 .

[31]  Lorraine Code.  What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge , 1991 .

[32]  Moti Gorin.  Towards a Theory of Interpersonal Manipulation , 2014 .

[33]  Allen W. Wood,et al.  Coercion, Manipulation, Exploitation , 2014 .

[34]  Christopher Boorse,et al.  Health as a Theoretical Concept , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[35]  C. Mayes.  The Biopolitics of Lifestyle: Foucault, Ethics and Healthy Choices , 2015 .