Theorizing an Integration of Reading and Mathematics: Solving Mathematical Word Problems in the Elementary Grades

This article theorizes three major cognitive constructs that are operationally defined by shared similarities of processing information in reading and mathematics. Specifically, the paper (1) proposes and details the refinement and evaluation of components of a conceptual model for reading to solve mathematical word problems for elementary students, and (2) develops and refines the theoretical constructs of the model. Our assumptions lay out the interrelationships of reading and mathematics word problems by focusing on the cognitive components of Recognizing Higher Level Patterns of Text Organization (R), Generating Patterns (G), and Attaining a Goal (A). These assumptions are to refine and construct the RGA cognitive components that could theoretically enhance elementary students’ reading and solution of mathematical word problem-solving abilities.

[1]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[2]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  Cognitive Models Underlying Students' Formulation of Simple Linear Equations , 1993 .

[3]  W Kintsch,et al.  Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. , 1985, Psychological review.

[4]  William P. Bintz,et al.  Using Literature to Support Mathematical Thinking in Middle School , 2002 .

[5]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF AUTOMATICITY FOR DEVELOPING EXPERTISE IN READING , 1997 .

[6]  P. Smagorinsky,et al.  The construction of meaning and identity in the composition and reading of an architectural text , 2005 .

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants , 1988, Cognition.

[8]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Are You Really Going to Read Us A Story? Learning Geometry Through Children's Mathematics Literature , 2006 .

[9]  Carl Braun,et al.  Using Story Schema as an Aid to Reading and Writing. , 1983 .

[10]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Metacognition and Self-Regulated Comprehension , 2004 .

[11]  S. Slough,et al.  Building Prior Knowledge and Vocabulary in Science in the Intermediate Grades: Creating Hooks for Learning , 2010 .

[12]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  The Relative Effectiveness of a Symbolic and a Concrete Model in Learning a Selected Mathematical Principle , 1972 .

[13]  Taffy E. Raphael,et al.  QAR: Enhancing Comprehension and Test Taking Across Grades and Content Areas , 2005 .

[14]  Evelyn J. Sowell.  Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction , 1989 .

[15]  Arthur J. Baroody,et al.  Manipulatives Don't Come with Guarantees. , 1989 .

[16]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning , 2004 .

[17]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Participation, Knowledge and Beliefs: A Community Perspective on Mathematics Learning , 1999 .

[18]  Gerald Kulm.  Teacher knowledge and practice in middle grades mathematics , 2008 .

[19]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Calculational and Conceptual Orientations in Teaching Mathematics , 1994 .

[20]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[21]  M. Pressley,et al.  The Nature of Cognitive Strategy Instruction: Interactive Strategy Construction , 1991 .

[22]  Eva Teubal,et al.  Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving , 1975 .

[23]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .

[24]  Nancy Fordham.  Crafting Questions That Address Comprehension Strategies in Content Reading. , 2006 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[26]  T. Adams,et al.  Reading Mathematics: More Than Words Can Say. , 2003 .

[27]  Victor V. Cifarelli,et al.  The development of mental representations as a problem solving activity , 1998 .

[28]  Scott Slough,et al.  Re‐creating a Recipe for Science Instructional Programs: Adding Learning Progressions, Scaffolding, and a Dash of Reading Variety , 2010 .

[29]  W. Nagy,et al.  Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers , 2003 .

[30]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for English Language Learners and Other Language-Minority Students , 2005 .

[31]  V. Willson,et al.  Relationship between Reading Comprehension and Components of Word Recognition: Support for Developmental Shifts. , 1991 .

[32]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Do Word-Problem Features Differentially Affect Problem Difficulty as a Function of Students' Mathematics Difficulty With and Without Reading Difficulty? , 2009, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  On Paradigms and Methods: What Do You Do When the Ones You Know Don't Do What You Want Them To? issues in the Analysis of Data in the Form of Videotapes , 1992 .

[34]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The process of understanding mathematical problems. , 1996 .

[35]  B. Zimmerman.  A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[36]  Judith Hillman,et al.  Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read , 2003 .

[37]  Algebraic word problems: Role of linguistic and structural variables , 1990 .

[38]  Frederick J. Morrison,et al.  EFFECTIVE READING COMPREHENSION INSTRUCTION: EXAMINING CHILD X INSTRUCTION INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[39]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Teaching Reading Vocabulary , 1978 .

[40]  D. Cross,et al.  Developmental and Instructional Analyses of Children's Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. , 1988 .

[41]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  Instruction Characteristics and Cognitive Achievement of Young Children in Elementary Schools , 2003 .

[42]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Web-Based History Learning Environments , 2007 .

[43]  Danièle Coquin-Viennot,et al.  Comprehension of arithmetic word problems by fifth-grade pupils: representations and selection of information. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[44]  Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst,et al.  When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems , 2002 .

[45]  M. Pressley,et al.  The Mnemonic Keyword Method , 1982 .

[46]  Marilyn N. Suydam.  Research Report: Manipulative Materials and Achievement. , 1986 .

[47]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies , 2008 .

[48]  P. Neufeld.  Comprehension Instruction in Content Area Classes , 2005 .

[49]  M. M. Capraro,et al.  Middle Grades: Misconceptions in Statistical Thinking , 2005 .

[50]  Manfred Prenzel,et al.  Welche Fragen konnen aus einer Gemeinsamen Interpretation der Befunde aus PISA and IGLU Fundiert Beantwortet Werden? (To Which Questions Does a Combined Interpretation of the Results Yielded by both PISA and IGLU Provide Well-Grounded Answers?). , 2003 .

[51]  Karen C. Fuson,et al.  Levels in Conceptualizing and Solving Addition and Subtraction Compare Word Problems , 1996 .

[52]  Alan E. Farstrup,et al.  What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction, Third Edition , 2011 .

[53]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[54]  H. Swanson.  Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities , 1999 .

[55]  David H. Rose,et al.  Cognition and learning: meeting the challenge of individual differences , 2005, ASAC.

[56]  Mary Lee Barton,et al.  Teaching Reading in Mathematics and Science. , 2002 .

[57]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Rethinking "Concrete" Manipulatives , 1996 .

[58]  Taffy E. Raphael,et al.  Teaching Question Answer Relationships, Revisited. , 1986 .

[59]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Reading-enhanced word problem solving: a theoretical model , 2012 .

[60]  Mary Margaret Capraro,et al.  Algebraic Equations: Can Middle-School Students Meaningfully Translate from Words to Mathematical Symbols? , 2006 .

[61]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[62]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 2007 .

[63]  Joseph M. Sencibaugh.  Meta-Analysis of Reading Comprehension Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Strategies and Implications. , 2005 .

[64]  Steven J. Chrostowski,et al.  TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. , 2004 .

[65]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning From Text: A Multidimensional and Developmental Perspective , 2000 .

[66]  Roberto Agodini,et al.  Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings From Two Student Cohorts. NCEE 2009-4041. , 2009 .

[67]  E. Corte,et al.  Making sense of word problems , 2000 .