Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users

Personal robots and screen agents can be equipped with social abilities to facilitate interaction. This paper describes our research on the influence of these abilities on elderly user’s acceptance of such a system. Experiments were set up in eldercare institutions where a robotic and screen agent with simulated conversational capabilities were used in a Wizard of Oz experiment. Both agents were used with two conditions: a more socially communicative (the agent made use of a larger set of social abilities in interaction) and a less socially communicative interface. Results show that participants who were confronted with the more socially communicative version of the robotic agent felt more comfortable and were more expressive in communicating with it. This suggests that the more socially communicative condition would be more likely to be accepted as a conversational partner. This effect was less strong however, with the screen agent, suggesting that embodiment plays a role in this. Furthermore, results did show a correlation between social abilities as perceived by participants and some aspects of technology acceptance for both systems, but this did not relate to the more and less socially communicative conditions. Evaluating the experiments and specifically the use of our acceptance model we suggest that this particular context of robotic and screen agents for elderly users requires the development of a more appropriate acceptance model which not only features technology acceptance, but also conversational acceptance.

[1]  R. Sternberg,et al.  People's conceptions of intelligence. , 1981 .

[2]  K. Scherer Toward a dynamic theory of emotion : The component process model of affective states , 1987 .

[3]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[4]  Christopher G. Lewis The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media as real people and places , 1997 .

[5]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Increasing the opportunities for aging in place , 2000, CUU '00.

[7]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Robots as New Media: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social and Cognitive Responses to Robotic and On-Screen Agents , 2002 .

[8]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Experiences with a mobile robotic guide for the elderly , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  From embodied to socially embedded agents – Implications for interaction-aware robots , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[10]  C. Breazeal Towards Sociable Robots , 2002 .

[11]  Loredana Cerrato,et al.  A comparison between feedback strategies in human-to-human and human-machine communication , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy , 2003, Robotica.

[13]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Effects of robot assisted activity to elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[15]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[18]  C. Bartneck,et al.  In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions , 2004 .

[19]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[20]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[21]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[22]  A. Libin,et al.  Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: Preliminary inquiry , 2004, American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

[23]  Nathan G. Freier,et al.  Social and moral relationships with robotic others? , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[24]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Towards caring machines , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[26]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elders with Cognitive Impairment , 2005, AI Mag..

[27]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  An Interactive Robot in a Nursing Home: Preliminary Remarks , 2005 .

[28]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Robotic products to assist the aging population , 2005, Interactions.

[29]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Engagement During Dialogues with Robots , 2005 .

[30]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[31]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[32]  M. Scopelliti,et al.  Coping strategies and technology in later life , 2005 .

[33]  Futoshi Naya,et al.  Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Incorporating guidelines for health assistance into a socially intelligent robot , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Determining what people feel and think when interacting with humans and machines Notes on corpus collection and annotation , 2006 .

[36]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: research, development, and applications , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[37]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy in a Care House - Results of Case Studies - , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[38]  Billy Lee,et al.  Could next generation androids get emotionally close? `Relational closeness' from human dyadic interactions , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[39]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Modeling Affect in Socially Interactive Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.