Methodological Proposal for Optimal Location of Emergency Operation Centers through Multi-Criteria Approach

Territorial vulnerability and risk analysis play a fundamental role in urban planning and emergency management. Requirements analysis of such aspects are possible to define more and more effective risk mitigation strategies providing efficient response plans to events. Many mitigation strategies as well as many response plans have in common the purpose of minimizing response time in order to decrease the level of vulnerability of the concerning area. The response time to a perturbing event is in fact an essential parameter to define the hazard of the considered site and literature is unanimous in considering it. In this context, the article proposes a methodology for the optimization of the location on the territory of emergency operation centers (EOCs), reducing response times and mitigating in this way the vulnerability of the area. The proposed methodology is based on a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) hybrid type AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)-Electre. This method has been applied in the territory of Bressanone and Vipiteno (Bolzano-Italy), simulating the need to build a new barrack of Fire Department. A campaign of interviews with operators and industry experts and the collection of spatial data from the portals of the concerned authorities has been carried out in order to get the number of necessary data for the implementation of the proposed methodology.

[1]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[3]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[4]  Franco Gugliermetti,et al.  INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL FACTORS ON A SITE SELECTION INDEX METHODOLOGY FOR A TECHNOLOGICAL CENTRE FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT , 2009 .

[5]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location , 2010 .

[6]  Ming-Shin Kuo,et al.  Optimal location selection for an international distribution center by using a new hybrid method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Rodney G. Tsiko,et al.  Integrating Geographical Information Systems, Fuzzy Logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process in Modelling Optimum Sites for Locating Water Reservoirs. A Case Study of the Debub District in Eritrea , 2011 .

[8]  Bian Ka,et al.  Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to China Dry Port Location Selection , 2011 .

[9]  S. K. Goyal,et al.  A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[10]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Selection of logistics center location using Axiomatic Fuzzy Set and TOPSIS methodology in logistics management , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Jun-Der Leu,et al.  An effectiveness evaluation model for the web-based marketing of the airline industry , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Christopher J. Savage,et al.  Systematic location of the public logistic centres in Czech Republic , 2012 .

[13]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Mile Savković,et al.  Application of the MODIPROM method to the final solution of logistics centre location , 2013 .

[15]  Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano,et al.  Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain , 2013 .

[16]  Slobodan Zecevic,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Gülfem Tuzkaya,et al.  An Integrated Methodology for the Emergency Logistics Centers Location Selection Problem and its Application for the Turkey Case , 2014 .

[18]  Jacek Żak,et al.  The Selection of the Logistics Center Location Based on MCDM/A Methodology☆ , 2014 .

[19]  Birol Elevli,et al.  Logistics freight center locations decision by using Fuzzy-PROMETHEE , 2014 .

[20]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selecting a location for a liquefied natural gas terminal in the Eastern Baltic Sea , 2014 .

[21]  Jacek Żak,et al.  Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV methods to multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of urban transportation projects , 2015 .

[22]  Dragan Marinković,et al.  The Selection of Logistic Centers Location Using Multi-Criteria Comparison: Case Study of the Balkan Peninsula , 2014, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica.

[23]  Abdolvahhab Fetanat,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran , 2015 .

[24]  N. Malys,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability , 2016 .

[25]  Adil Baykasoglu,et al.  An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Application of Neutrosophic Set to Multicriteria Decision Making by Copras , 2017 .