Novel multimodal MRI and MicroCT imaging approach to quantify angiogenesis and 3D vascular architecture of biomaterials

Quantitative assessment of functional perfusion capacity and vessel architecture is critical when validating biomaterials for regenerative medicine purposes and requires high-tech analytical methods. Here, combining two clinically relevant imaging techniques, (magnetic resonance imaging; MRI and microcomputed tomography; MicroCT) and using the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay, we present and validate a novel functional and morphological three-dimensional (3D) analysis strategy to study neovascularization in biomaterials relevant for bone regeneration. Using our new pump-assisted approach, the two scaffolds, Optimaix (laminar structure mimicking entities of the diaphysis) and DegraPol (highly porous resembling spongy bone), were shown to directly affect the architecture of the ingrowing neovasculature. Perfusion capacity (MRI) and total vessel volume (MicroCT) strongly correlated for both biomaterials, suggesting that our approach allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the vascularization pattern and efficiency of biomaterials. Being compliant with the 3R-principles (replacement, reduction and refinement), the well-established and easy-to-handle CAM model offers many advantages such as low costs, immune-incompetence and short experimental times with high-grade read-outs when compared to conventional animal models. Therefore, combined with our imaging-guided approach it represents a powerful tool to study angiogenesis in biomaterials.

[1]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Visualizing Angiogenesis by Multiphoton Microscopy In Vivo in Genetically Modified 3D-PLGA/nHAp Scaffold for Calvarial Critical Bone Defect Repair. , 2017, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[2]  M. Kawanami,et al.  Periodontal repair following implantation of beta-tricalcium phosphate with different pore structures in Class III furcation defects in dogs. , 2012, Dental materials journal.

[3]  Stefan Langer,et al.  Neovascularization of poly(ether ester) block-copolymer scaffolds in vivo: long-term investigations using intravital fluorescent microscopy. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[4]  I Heschel,et al.  A biomaterial with a channel-like pore architecture induces endochondral healing of bone defects , 2018, Nature Communications.

[5]  Arvind P Pathak,et al.  Assessing breast cancer angiogenesis in vivo: which susceptibility contrast MRI biomarkers are relevant? , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[7]  Moreno-JiménezInés,et al.  *The Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay for Biomaterial Testing in Tissue Engineering: A Short-Term In Vivo Preclinical Model , 2017 .

[8]  F. M. van den Engh,et al.  Photoacoustic image patterns of breast carcinoma and comparisons with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and vascular stained histopathology , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  A. Pabst,et al.  Imaging angiogenesis: perspectives and opportunities in tumour research - a method display. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[10]  Lu Tian,et al.  Quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis using real-time motion-compensated contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging , 2012, Angiogenesis.

[11]  A. von Eckardstein,et al.  Safety and efficacy of cardiopoietic stem cells in the treatment of post-infarction left-ventricular dysfunction - From cardioprotection to functional repair in a translational pig infarction model. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[12]  S. Miraux,et al.  3D anatomical and perfusion MRI for longitudinal evaluation of biomaterials for bone regeneration of femoral bone defect in rats , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  M. Raimondi,et al.  A comparative evaluation of chondrocyte/scaffold constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2004, Journal of applied biomaterials & biomechanics : JABB.

[14]  S. Hoerstrup,et al.  Cellular self-assembly into 3D microtissues enhances the angiogenic activity and functional neovascularization capacity of human cardiopoietic stem cells , 2018, Angiogenesis.

[15]  S. Dorozhkin Calcium orthophosphates , 2011, Biomatter.

[16]  P. Gañán,et al.  Development of novel three-dimensional scaffolds based on bacterial nanocellulose for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Effect of processing methods, pore size, and surface area. , 2018, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[17]  T. Gerber,et al.  Acceleration of vascularized bone tissue-engineered constructs in a large animal model combining intrinsic and extrinsic vascularization. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[18]  Sergey V. Dorozhkin,et al.  Calcium orthophosphates , 2007 .

[19]  T. Mitsiadis,et al.  Angiogenesis within Stem Cell-Seeded Silk Scaffolds Cultured on the Chorioallantoic Membrane and Visualized by 3D Imaging. , 2017, Current protocols in stem cell biology.

[20]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Angiogenesis in tissue engineering: breathing life into constructed tissue substitutes. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[21]  M. Neumeister,et al.  Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering: Regeneration of the Skin and Its Contents. , 2017, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[22]  C. Waschkies,et al.  Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Markus Rudin,et al.  Three-dimensional co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells in DegraPol foam: histological and high-field magnetic resonance imaging analyses of pre-engineered capillary networks in bone grafts. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[24]  S. Lo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of angiogenesis using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2004, Angiogenesis.

[25]  I. Spyridopoulos,et al.  Microvessels of the heart: Formation, regeneration, and dysfunction , 2017, Microcirculation.

[26]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Supercritical carbon dioxide generated vascular endothelial growth factor encapsulated poly(DL-lactic acid) scaffolds induce angiogenesis in vitro. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  F. Kiefer,et al.  A novel model for ectopic, chronic, intravital multiphoton imaging of bone marrow vasculature and architecture in split femurs , 2015, Intravital.

[28]  Daniel Razansky,et al.  Anatomical and microstructural imaging of angiogenesis , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  T. Järvinen,et al.  Deep Vascular Imaging in Wounds by Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  H. Schwarcz,et al.  A Model for the Ultrastructure of Bone Based on Electron Microscopy of Ion-Milled Sections , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Feng Gao,et al.  Optimization of MicroCT Imaging and Blood Vessel Diameter Quantitation of Preclinical Specimen Vasculature with Radiopaque Polymer Injection Medium , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  M. Konerding,et al.  Vascular casting for the study of vascular morphogenesis. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[33]  Kivrak PfiffnerFatma,et al.  A new in vivo magnetic resonance imaging method to noninvasively monitor and quantify the perfusion capacity of three-dimensional biomaterials grown on the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos. , 2015 .

[34]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Non-invasive imaging for studying anti-angiogenic therapy effects , 2013, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[35]  M. Dadsetan,et al.  VEGF-mediated angiogenesis and vascularization of a fumarate-crosslinked polycaprolactone (PCLF) scaffold , 2018, Connective tissue research.

[36]  The Year in Review , 1990, Bio/Technology.

[37]  B. Johansen,et al.  Anti‐angiogenic therapy affects the relationship between tumor vascular structure and function: A correlation study between micro–computed tomography angiography and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  I. Kanno,et al.  Hypoxia-induced cerebral angiogenesis in mouse cortex with two-photon microscopy. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[39]  A. Hess,et al.  Acceleration of vascularized bone tissue-engineered constructs in a large animal model combining intrinsic and extrinsic vascularization. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[40]  K. Balagangadharan,et al.  Natural and synthetic polymers/bioceramics/bioactive compounds-mediated cell signalling in bone tissue engineering. , 2017, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[41]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[42]  A. Forbes,et al.  Microporous collagen spheres produced via thermally induced phase separation for tissue regeneration. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[43]  Joseph P Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. , 2007, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society.

[44]  Sharon E Ungersma,et al.  Vessel imaging with viable tumor analysis for quantification of tumor angiogenesis , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  K. Daoudi,et al.  Review of photoacoustic flow imaging: its current state and its promises , 2015, Photoacoustics.

[46]  G. Wright,et al.  The Characteristics of Vascular Growth in VX2 Tumor Measured by MRI and Micro-CT , 2011, Journal of oncology.

[47]  A. Peterson,et al.  Micro-CT imaging and structural analysis of glomeruli in a model of Adriamycin-induced nephropathy. , 2019, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[48]  G. Tromba,et al.  Synchrotron Phase Tomography: An Emerging Imaging Method for Microvessel Detection in Engineered Bone of Craniofacial Districts , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[49]  S. Kadam,et al.  Artificial Bone via Bone Tissue Engineering: Current Scenario and Challenges , 2017, Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

[50]  P. Neuenschwander,et al.  Cyto- and hemocompatibility of a biodegradable 3D-scaffold material designed for medical applications. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[51]  S. Yedgar,et al.  Hemodynamic Functionality of Transfused Red Blood Cells in the Microcirculation of Blood Recipients , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[52]  G. Bowlin,et al.  Cell infiltration and vascularization in porous nanoyarn scaffolds prepared by dynamic liquid electrospinning. , 2014, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[53]  C R Merritt Technology update. , 2001, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[54]  J. Kanczler,et al.  The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay for the study of human bone regeneration: a refinement animal model for tissue engineering , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[55]  C. Castro,et al.  Ex Vivo and In Vivo Biocompatibility Assessment (Blood and Tissue) of Three-Dimensional Bacterial Nanocellulose Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Implants , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2015: A Year in Review. , 2016, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[57]  M. Rudin,et al.  A new in vivo magnetic resonance imaging method to noninvasively monitor and quantify the perfusion capacity of three-dimensional biomaterials grown on the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[58]  Xu Zhou,et al.  The development of an extra-anatomic tissue-engineered artery with collateral arteries for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic hind limb , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[59]  Z. Yi,et al.  An aligned porous electrospun fibrous membrane with controlled drug delivery - An efficient strategy to accelerate diabetic wound healing with improved angiogenesis. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[60]  M. Siebes,et al.  Optimization of Vascular Casting for Three-Dimensional Fluorescence Cryo-Imaging of Collateral Vessels in the Ischemic Rat Hindlimb , 2017, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[61]  C. Aparicio,et al.  Discerning the Subfibrillar Structure of Mineralized Collagen Fibrils: A Model for the Ultrastructure of Bone , 2013, PloS one.

[62]  A. Rowan The concept of the three R's. An introduction. , 1980, Developments in biological standardization.

[63]  A. Khojasteh,et al.  Application of selected scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a systematic review , 2017, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

[64]  Didier Gourier,et al.  The in vivo activation of persistent nanophosphors for optical imaging of vascularization, tumours and grafted cells. , 2014, Nature materials.

[65]  F. Schügner,et al.  A Standardized Collagen-Based Scaffold Improves Human Hepatocyte Shipment and Allows Metabolic Studies over 10 Days , 2018, Bioengineering.

[66]  Michal Neeman,et al.  Imaging aspects of the tumor stroma with therapeutic implications. , 2014, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[67]  Cedryck Vaquette,et al.  Tissue Engineering in Hand Surgery: A Technology Update. , 2017, The Journal of hand surgery.