Distributed Lagrangian Relaxation Protocol for the Over-constrained Generalized Mutual Assignment Problem

The Generalized Mutual Assignment Problem (GMAP) is a distributed combinatorial optimization problem in which, with no centralized control, multiple agents search for an optimal assignment of goods that satisfies their individual knapsack constraints. Previously, in the GMAP protocol, problem instances were assumed to be feasible, meaning that the total capacities of the agents were large enough to assign the goods. However, this assumption may not be realistic in some situations. In this paper, we present two methods for dealing with such “over-constrained” GMAP instances. First, we introduce a disposal agent who has an unlimited capacity and is in charge of the unassigned goods. With this method, we can use any off-the-shelf GMAP protocol since the disposal agent can make the instances feasible. Second, we formulate the GMAP instances as an Integer Programming (IP) problem, in which the assignment constraints are described with inequalities. With this method, we need to devise a new protocol for such a formulation. We experimentally compared these two methods on the variants of Generalized Assignment Problem (GAP) benchmark instances. Our results indicate that the first method finds a solution faster for fewer over-constrained instances, and the second finds a better solution faster for more over-constrained instances.

[1]  C.J.H. Mann,et al.  Handbook of Approximation: Algorithms and Metaheuristics , 2008 .

[2]  Sania Bhatti,et al.  Survey of Target Tracking Protocols Using Wireless Sensor Network , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications.

[3]  O. Erhun Kundakcioglu,et al.  Generalized Assignment Problem , 2009, Encyclopedia of Optimization.

[4]  Katsutoshi Hirayama,et al.  A New Approach to Distributed Task Assignment using Lagrangian Decomposition and Distributed Constraint Satisfaction , 2006, AAAI.

[5]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  An asynchronous complete method for distributed constraint optimization , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[6]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adaptive price update in distributed Lagrangian relaxation protocol , 2009, AAMAS.

[7]  Jakub Marecek,et al.  Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics , 2010, Comput. J..

[8]  Monique Guignard-Spielberg,et al.  Lagrangean decomposition: A model yielding stronger lagrangean bounds , 1987, Math. Program..

[9]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[10]  Robert M. Nauss The Generalized Assignment Problem , 2005 .

[11]  Kay Römer,et al.  Distributed Facility Location Algorithms for Flexible Configuration of Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, DCOSS.

[12]  Katsutoshi Hirayama An α-approximation protocol for the generalized mutual assignment problem , 2007, AAAI 2007.

[13]  F. Glover,et al.  In Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems , 1993 .

[14]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Reid G. Smith,et al.  The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Computers.