Modulation of antigen processing by bound antibodies can boost or suppress class II major histocompatibility complex presentation of different T cell determinants

Bound antibodies can modulate antigen processing but it is not clear to what extent this affects antigen presentation. Here we show that presentation of T cell determinants in tetanus toxin can be either enhanced or suppressed as a direct consequence of antibody modulation of antigen processing in human B lymphoblastoid cells. Remarkably, a single bound antibody or its Fab fragment can simultaneously enhance the presentation of one T cell determinant by more than 10-fold while strongly suppressing the presentation of a different T cell determinant. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that both the suppressed and boosted determinants fall within an extended domain of antigen stabilized or "footprinted" by this antibody during proteolysis. These results demonstrate that bound antibodies can modulate the capture of peptides by class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC), thus manipulating the T cell response towards or away from particular determinants. Altered processing of protein-protein complexes leading to enhanced loading of class II MHC and substantially lowered threshold for T cell activation suggests a novel mechanism that might reveal "cryptic" self determinants.

[1]  P. Endert.  Antigen Processing , 2013, Methods in Molecular Biology™.

[2]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Suppressive effect of antibody on processing of T cell epitopes , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  J. Cabaniols,et al.  Tolerance to a self-protein involves its immunodominant but does not involve its subdominant determinants. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  H. Ploegh,et al.  Isolation and characterization of the intracellular MHC class II compartment , 1994, Nature.

[5]  A. Wandinger-Ness,et al.  Separation of subcellular compartments containing distinct functional forms of MHC class II , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  J. Skehel,et al.  The immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza hemagglutinin: commonality of the B cell and T cell repertoires and their relevance to antigenic drift , 1989, European journal of immunology.

[7]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Delineation of several DR-restricted tetanus toxin T cell epitopes. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[8]  E. Sercarz,et al.  How some T cells escape tolerance induction , 1989, Nature.

[9]  R. Jemmerson,et al.  Mapping epitopes on a protein antigen by the proteolysis of antigen-antibody complexes. , 1986, Science.

[10]  E. Sercarz,et al.  Spreading of T-cell autoimmunity to cryptic determinants of an autoantigen , 1992, Nature.

[11]  F. Celada,et al.  Constraints in T‐B cooperation related to epitope topology on E. coli β‐galactosidase. I. The fine specificity of T cells dictates the fine specificity of antibodies directed to conformation‐ dependent determinants , 1985, European journal of immunology.

[12]  H. Davidson,et al.  Processing of immunoglobulin-associated antigen in B lymphocytes. , 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

[13]  M. Satoh,et al.  Initiation of autoimmunity to the p53 tumor suppressor protein by complexes of p53 and SV40 large T antigen , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  D. Long,et al.  Effect of monoclonal antibodies on limited proteolysis of native glycoprotein gD of herpes simplex virus type 1 , 1982, Journal of virology.

[15]  A. Miller,et al.  Dominance and crypticity of T cell antigenic determinants. , 1993, Annual review of immunology.

[16]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells , 1985, Nature.

[17]  H. Davidson,et al.  Epitope-directed processing of specific antigen by B lymphocytes , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  N. Fairweather,et al.  Expression of Tetanus Toxin Fragment C in E. coli: Its Purification and Potential Use as a Vaccine , 1989, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  H. Davidson,et al.  Endocytosis, intracellular trafficking, and processing of membrane IgG and monovalent antigen/membrane IgG complexes in B lymphocytes. , 1990, Journal of immunology.

[20]  A. Henschen,et al.  Tetanus toxin: primary structure, expression in E. coli, and homology with botulinum toxins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[21]  H. Geuze,et al.  Immunogenic peptides bind to class II MHC molecules in an early lysosomal compartment. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[22]  J. Berzofsky,et al.  Antibody conjugates mimic specific B cell presentation of antigen: relationship between T and B cell specificity. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[23]  F. Celada,et al.  Preferential pairing of T-B specificities in the same antigen: the concept of directional help. , 1988, Vaccine.

[24]  I. Mellman,et al.  Transient accumulation of new class II MHC molecules in a novel endocytic compartment in B lymphocytes , 1994, Nature.

[25]  N. Fairweather,et al.  The complete nucleotide sequence of tetanus toxin. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Limit of T cell tolerance to self proteins by peptide presentation. , 1990, Science.

[27]  F Celada,et al.  Differential activation of T cell clones stimulated by macrophages exposed to antigen complexed with monoclonal antibodies. A possible influence of paratope specificity on the mode of antigen processing. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[28]  M. Mamula.  The inability to process a self-peptide allows autoreactive T cells to escape tolerance , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.