Differences in pigment composition, photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence images of sun and shade leaves of four tree species.

The differential pigment composition and photosynthetic activity of sun and shade leaves of deciduous (Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvatica, Tilia cordata) and coniferous (Abies alba) trees was comparatively determined by studying the photosynthetic rates via CO(2) measurements and also by imaging the Chl fluorescence decrease ratio (R(Fd)), which is an in vivo indicator of the net CO(2) assimilation rates. The thicker sun leaves and needles in all tree species were characterized by a lower specific leaf area, lower water content, higher total chlorophyll (Chl) a+b and total carotenoid (Cars) content per leaf area unit, as well as higher values for the ratio Chl a/b compared to the much thinner shade leaves and needles that possess a higher Chl a+b and Cars content on a dry matter basis and higher values for the weight ratio Chls/Cars. Sun leaves and needles exhibited higher rates of maximum net photosynthetic CO(2) assimilation (P(Nmax)) measured at saturating irradiance associated with higher maximum stomatal conductance for water vapor efflux. The differences in photosynthetic activity between sun and shade leaves and needles could also be sensed via imaging the Chl fluorescence decrease ratio R(Fd), since it linearly correlated to the P(Nmax) rates at saturating irradiance. Chl fluorescence imaging not only provided the possibility to screen the differences in P(N) rates between sun and shade leaves, but in addition permitted detection and quantification of the large gradients in photosynthetic rates across the leaf area existing in sun and shade leaves.

[1]  Per Ambus,et al.  Field measurements of atmosphere-biosphere interactions in a Danish beech forest , 2003 .

[2]  Sharifi,et al.  Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sun Versus Shade Plants of Encelia farinosa as Affected by Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density, Intercellular CO2 Concentration, Leaf Water Potential, and Leaf Temperature , 1995 .

[3]  N. Boardman.  Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. , 1977 .

[4]  D. Hölscher.  Leaf traits and photosynthetic parameters of saplings and adult trees of co-existing species in a temperate broad-leaved forest , 2004 .

[5]  S. Colowick,et al.  Methods in Enzymology , Vol , 1966 .

[6]  O. Björkman,et al.  Leaf Xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC , 1990, Photosynthesis Research.

[7]  D. Sims,et al.  5 – Photosynthetic Acclimation to Changing Light Environments: Scaling from the Leaf to the Whole Plant , 1994 .

[8]  Wah Soon Chow,et al.  The grand design of photosynthesis: Acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to environmental cues , 1995, Photosynthesis Research.

[9]  K. Egle,et al.  Lichtfeld und Blattfarbstoffe I , 1937, Planta.

[10]  R. Ryel,et al.  Stomatal patchiness in conifers: experiments with Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Abies alba Mill. , 1994, Trees.

[11]  I. Terashima,et al.  Why are Sun Leaves Thicker than Shade Leaves? — Consideration based on Analyses of CO2 Diffusion in the Leaf , 2001, Journal of Plant Research.

[12]  H. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Differences in photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll and carotenoid levels, and in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in green sun and shade leaves of Ginkgo and Fagus. , 2007, Journal of plant physiology.

[13]  S. Pandey,et al.  Photosynthetic Performance of Ginkgo biloba L. Grown Under High and Low Irradiance , 2003, Photosynthetica.

[14]  M. Tausz,et al.  Photostress, photoprotection, and water soluble antioxidants in the canopies of five Canarian laurel forest tree species during a diurnal course in the field , 2004 .

[15]  E. Schulze,et al.  Measurement of CO2 Gas-Exchange and Transpiration in the Beech (Fagus silvatica L.) , 1971 .

[16]  Mark E. Kubiske,et al.  Ecophysiological responses to simulated canopy gaps of two tree species of contrasting shade tolerance in elevated CO2 , 1997 .

[17]  M. Marek,et al.  Stand microclimate and physiological activity of tree leaves in an oak-hornbeam forest , 1989, Trees.

[18]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  GLOBAL-SCALE CLIMATIC CONTROLS OF LEAF DRY MASS PER AREA, DENSITY, AND THICKNESS IN TREES AND SHRUBS , 2001 .

[19]  Ronald E. Wrolstad,et al.  Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry , 2000 .

[20]  B. Demmig‐Adams,et al.  Survey of Thermal Energy Dissipation and Pigment Composition in Sun and Shade Leaves , 1998 .

[21]  H. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Measurement of Differences in Red Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthetic Activity between Sun and Shade Leaves by Fluorescence Imaging , 2000, Photosynthetica.

[22]  Y. Joshi,et al.  Moisture-deficit-induced changes in leaf-water content, leaf carbon exchange rate and biomass production in groundnut cultivars differing in specific leaf area , 2002 .

[23]  H. Lichtenthaler.  CHLOROPHYLL AND CAROTENOIDS: PIGMENTS OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC BIOMEMBRANES , 1987 .

[24]  John M. Watts,et al.  Analysis and synthesis , 1985 .

[25]  Ladislav Nedbal,et al.  Kinetic imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence using modulated light , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[26]  W. Beyschlag,et al.  Towards a causal analysis of stomatal patchiness: the role of stomatal size variability and hydrological heterogeneity , 2001 .

[27]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[28]  P. Nobel,et al.  Photosynthetic Rates of Sun versus Shade Leaves of Hyptis emoryi Torr. , 1976, Plant physiology.

[29]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  The functional significance of palisade tissue : penetration of directional versus diffuse light , 1993 .

[30]  Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Detection of photosynthetic activity and water stressby imaging the red chlorophyll fluorescence , 2000 .

[31]  M. Richter,et al.  Changes in the Stoichiometry of Photosystem II Components as an Adaptive Response to High-Light and Low-Light Conditions during Growth , 1986 .

[32]  C. Buschmann,et al.  How to correctly determine the different chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and the chlorophyll fluorescence decrease ratio RFd of leaves with the PAM fluorometer , 2005, Photosynthetica.

[33]  G. Midgley,et al.  Photosynthetic and gas exchange characteristics of dominant woody plants on a moisture gradient in an African savanna , 2004 .

[34]  H. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Chlorophyll‐protein levels and degree of thylakoid stacking in radish chloroplasts from high‐light, low‐light and bentazon‐treated plants , 1982 .

[35]  Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Light-induced and Age-dependent Development ofChloroplasts in Etiolated Barley Leaves as Visualized by Determination of Photosynthetic Pigments, C02 Assimilation Rates and Different Kinds of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Ratios , 1996 .

[36]  Chlorophyll fluorescence as an exploratory tool for ecophysiological studies on mosses and other small poikilohydric plants , 1997 .

[37]  Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Light Adaptation and Senescence of the Photosynthetic Apparatus. Changes in Pigment Composition, Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters and Photosynthetic Activity , 2004 .

[38]  Chengjun Zhang,et al.  Variation in Ginkgo biloba L. leaf characters across a climatic gradient in China , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Ü. Niinemets.  Role of foliar nitrogen in light harvesting and shade tolerance of four temperate deciduous woody species , 1997 .

[40]  Richard Willstätter,et al.  Untersuchungen über chlorophyll , 1907 .

[41]  Herrick,et al.  Effects of CO2 enrichment on the photosynthetic light response of sun and shade leaves of canopy sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) in a forest ecosystem. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[42]  P. Neugebauer,et al.  Light-flecks cause non-uniform stomatal opening – studies with special emphasis on Fagus sylvatica L. , 1999, Trees.

[43]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Altitude of origin influences stomatal conductance and therefore maximum assimilation rate in Southern Beech, Nothofagus cunninghamii , 2000 .

[44]  M. Marek,et al.  Chloroplastic Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Norway Spruce (Picea Abies [L.] Karst.) needles relates to the position within the crown , 1998, Photosynthetica.

[45]  H. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Ultrastructural development of chloroplasts in radish seedlings grown at high- and low-light conditions and in the presence of the herbicide bentazon , 1981, Protoplasma.

[46]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Canopy dynamics and the morphological development of Abies balsamea: effects of foliage age on specific leaf area and secondary vascular development. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[47]  M. Marek,et al.  Temperature dependences of carbon assimilation processes in four dominant species from mountain grassland ecosystem , 2007, Photosynthetica.

[48]  D. Meier,et al.  Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves , 1981, Photosynthesis Research.

[49]  Francine Heisel,et al.  Fluorescence Imaging of Water and Temperature Stress in Plant Leaves , 1996 .

[50]  M. Marek,et al.  Mechanistic differences in utilization of absorbed excitation energy within photosynthetic apparatus of Norway spruce induced by the vertical distribution of photosynthetically active radiation through the tree crown , 1998 .