So that's what the impact of IT innovation looks like? Examining the socio-technical dynamics of public service innovation

Services comprise of socio-technical (human and technological) factors which exchange various resources and competencies. Service networks are used to transfer resources and competencies, yet they remain an underexplored and “invisible” infrastructure. Considering the growth in technological investment in recent years, this research sets out to model the impact of IT-enabled innovation on a service network. In response to the growing importance placed on understanding these complexities, the field of “service science” has emerged to guide the effective design, implementation, and management of service systems. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of introducing an IT-enabled innovation in a public service network.,This is achieved through a case study of an Exam Administration Service Department (EASD) where an electronic grading system was introduced to improve the EASD grading process. Data are analysed using both actor-network theory (ANT) as a theoretical lens and social network analysis (SNA) for empirical purposes to visualise the impact of IT-enabled innovation on a service environment.,The research described in this paper makes a useful contribution to the service science and IT innovation community both in terms of its topic (public service networks) and in terms of its theoretical framework and application methods (ANT and SNA).,This paper demonstrates how we can investigate the impact of IT-enabled innovation within a service network. Most notably, the application of SNA enables us to visualise the impact of technology and gain insights on the socio-technical dynamics associated with introducing service innovations.

[1]  Arthur Tatnall,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and Information Systems Research , 1999 .

[2]  I. Pangaribuan It Doesnt Matter , 2015 .

[3]  Eoin Whelan,et al.  Service Science: An Actor-Network Theory Approach , 2012, InnovaInt. J. Actor Netw. Theory Technol. Innov..

[4]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet , 2010 .

[6]  Markus Helfert,et al.  Towards the Development of a Cloud Service Capability Assessment Framework , 2014 .

[7]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context , 2015 .

[8]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[9]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[10]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[11]  Noel Carroll,et al.  Service science: an empirical study on the socio-technical dynamics of public sector service network innovation , 2012 .

[12]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[13]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management , 2015 .

[14]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[15]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Mike P. Papazoglou,et al.  Sound Multi-party Business Protocols for Service Networks , 2008, ICSOC.

[17]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Mona J. Fitzsimmons,et al.  New Service Development: Creating Memorable Experiences , 1999 .

[21]  Greg Linden,et al.  Business Model Innovation and Organizational Design: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective , 2014 .

[22]  E. Waarts,et al.  Business agility: need, readiness and alignment with IT-strategies , 2006 .

[23]  Paolo Piciocchi,et al.  An Integrated SS-VSA Analysis of Changing Job Roles , 2010 .

[24]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[25]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[26]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[27]  Rafael Ramírez,et al.  From Value Chain to Value Constellation , 1996 .

[28]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro- structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so , 2014 .

[29]  César Camisón,et al.  Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance , 2014 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[31]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Service Science: The Opportunity to Re-think What We Know About Service Design , 2011, The Science of Service Systems.

[32]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[34]  Nik Rushdi Hassan,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Measure IT-Enabled Business Process Performance , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[36]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[37]  M. Weber Economy and society : an outline of interpretive sociology , 2008 .

[38]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[39]  Eoin Whelan,et al.  Applying Social Network Analysis to Discover Service Innovation within Agile Service Networks , 2010 .

[40]  Markus Helfert,et al.  Service capabilities within open innovation: Revisiting the applicability of capability maturity models , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[42]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[43]  G. Walsham Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[44]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Network Theory | Multidimensional Networks and the Dynamics of Sociomateriality: Bringing Technology Inside the Network , 2011 .

[45]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2007, Computer.

[46]  Yan Wang,et al.  Service Networks Performance Analytics - A Literature Review , 2011, CLOSER.

[47]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[48]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Social Network Analysis For Organizations , 1979 .

[49]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[50]  Arne De Keyser,et al.  How technical and functional service quality drive consumer happiness Moderating influences of channel usage , 2014 .

[51]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective , 2008 .

[52]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[53]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Leveraging Social Networks for Strategic Success , 2015 .