Comparing the score interpretation across modes in PISA: an investigation of how item facets affect difficulty

[1]  Frank Goldhammer,et al.  Reanalysis of the German PISA Data: A Comparison of Different Approaches for Trend Estimation With a Particular Emphasis on Mode Effects , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[2]  Johan Uvin.  The Survey of Adult Skills , 2019, OECD Skills Studies.

[3]  Frank Goldhammer,et al.  Construct Equivalence of PISA Reading Comprehension Measured With Paper‐Based and Computer‐Based Assessments , 2019, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice.

[4]  Frank Goldhammer,et al.  What makes the difference? The impact of item properties on mode effects in reading assessments , 2019, Studies in Educational Evaluation.

[5]  I. Mullis,et al.  The TIMSS 2019 Item Equivalence Study: examining mode effects for computer-based assessment and implications for measuring trends , 2018, Large-scale Assessments in Education.

[6]  I. Mullis,et al.  The TIMSS 2019 Item Equivalence Study: examining mode effects for computer-based assessment and implications for measuring trends , 2018, Large-scale Assessments in Education.

[7]  John Jerrim,et al.  PISA 2015: how big is the ‘mode effect’ and what has been done about it? , 2018 .

[8]  Frank Goldhammer,et al.  The Transition to Computer-Based Testing in Large-Scale Assessments: Investigating (Partial) Measurement Invariance between Modes , 2016 .

[9]  P. Kind.  Conceptualizing the Science Curriculum: 40 Years of Developing Assessment Frameworks in Three Large‐Scale Assessments , 2013 .

[10]  Eckhard Klieme,et al.  An Application of Explanatory Item Response Modeling for Model-Based Proficiency Scaling , 2012 .

[11]  Ulf Kröhne,et al.  11 Computer-based competence tests in the national educational panel study: The challenge of mode effects , 2011 .

[12]  M. Begg.  An introduction to categorical data analysis (2nd edn). Alan Agresti, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007. No. of Pages: 400. Price: $100.95. ISBN: 978‐0‐471‐22618‐5 , 2009 .

[13]  Neal M. Kingston.  Comparability of Computer- and Paper-Administered Multiple-Choice Tests for K–12 Populations: A Synthesis , 2008 .

[14]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Does It Matter if I Take My Mathematics Test on Computer? A Second Empirical Study of Mode Effects in NAEP. , 2008 .

[15]  Hong Jiao,et al.  Comparability of Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Testing in K–12 Reading Assessments , 2008 .

[16]  The International Test Commission.  International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing , 2006 .

[17]  S. Sireci,et al.  Validity Issues in Computer-Based Testing , 2005 .

[18]  Mary Pommerich,et al.  Developing Computerized Versions of Paper-and-Pencil Tests: Mode Effects for Passage-Based Tests , 2004 .

[19]  E. Muraki.  A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL: APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM , 1992 .

[20]  J. Fox,et al.  Differential Item Functioning in PISA Due to Mode Effects , 2019, Theoretical and Practical Advances in Computer-based Educational Measurement.

[21]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  The Evolution and Key Concepts of the PISA Mathematics Frameworks , 2015 .

[22]  D. Eignor.  The standards for educational and psychological testing. , 2013 .

[23]  A. Agresti.  An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[24]  S. Whitely.  Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. , 1983 .