Strategic performance evaluation: descriptive and prescriptive analysis

Addresses the question of how to assure effective performance evaluation of a public service strategic unit. Both descriptive and prescriptive approaches are discussed. Based on this analysis a practical model for performance evaluation is developed. The model proposed comprises key drivers of performance, including internal and external factors, as well as both quantitative and qualitative factors, simultaneously. The model has been designed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and tested using the Expert Choice Software. The testing results show that the evaluation outcomes differ as a function of the criteria used, the weight assigned, and the meaning given to each criterion. Using the same criteria with a different weighting scheme results in different outcomes for the same performance. This counter‐intuitive finding has important implications for management practice.

[1]  Tarr Jd,et al.  Performance measurements for a continuous improvement strategy. , 1996 .

[2]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  The Development of Strategic Performance Metrics , 1995 .

[3]  Geary A. Rummler,et al.  Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organization Chart , 1990 .

[4]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[5]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING CHANGES IN STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[6]  Lee M Mandell Performance Measurement and Management Tools in North Carolina Local Government: Revisited , 1997 .

[7]  E. Savas An Empirical Study of Competition in Municipal Service Delivery , 1977 .

[8]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The hierarchon : a dictionary of hierarchies , 1996 .

[10]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  The Economics of Public Utility Regulation , 1986 .

[11]  W. E. Franklin,et al.  Resource and environmental profile analysis: A life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures , 1992 .

[12]  R. Hayes Restoring our competitive edge , 1984 .

[13]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Strategic Assessment Model (SAM): A Multiple Criteria Decision Support System for Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives* , 1995 .

[14]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[15]  Hans-Werner Gottinger,et al.  Economic Models and Applications of Solid Waste Management , 1991 .

[16]  Madhav V. Rajan,et al.  Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis , 1972 .

[17]  R. Eccles The performance measurement manifesto. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[18]  E. Savas On Equity in Providing Public Services , 1978 .

[19]  A. Atkinson,et al.  Strategic performance measurement and incentive compensation , 1998 .

[20]  CharnesA.,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency , 1981 .

[21]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[22]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement , 1997 .