Magnification, receptive-field area, and "hypercolumn" size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys.

1. Several features of the two complete and separate representations of the contralateral body surface in cortical areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys were quantitatively studied. 2. Area1 magnification factors for different body regions in the two representations were obtained. The glabrous hand and foot regions were found to occupy nearly 100 times more cortical tissue per unit body-surface area than the trunk or upper arm. 3. In the representations of the hand digits, inverse magnification was linearly related to distance from the digit tips. 4. Receptive-field size was found to be proportional to inverse magnification over the entire body-surface representation as well as over the local region of the glabrous hand digits. The relation between receptive-field size and inverse magnification appears to be linear; specification of one would specify the other over the representation in one area. 5. By relating receptive-field overlap to distance separating recording sites, the area of cortex presumed to receive all fibers from any given receptive field was obtained and found to be independent of the body surface represented. Such an area of somatosensory cortex, about l1.5 mm in diameter, may be akin to the “hypercolumn” proposed for primary visual cortex (6).

[1]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Representation of cutaneous tactile sensibility in cerebral cortex of Cebus. , 1958, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[3]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[4]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Representation of slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors of the hand in Brodmann's areas 3 and 1 of Macaca mulatta. , 1972, Brain research.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  J. Malpeli,et al.  The representation of the visual field in the lateral geniculate nucleus of Macaca mulatta , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  K. Albus.  A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and the paracentral visual field in area 17 of the cat , 1975, Experimental brain research.

[10]  J M Allman,et al.  Magnification in striate cortex and retinal ganglion cell layer of owl monkey: a quantitative comparison , 1977, Science.

[11]  R. Johansson.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  L. Palmer,et al.  The retinotopic organization of lateral suprasylvian visual areas in the cat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. Kaas,et al.  The representation of the body surface in somatosensory area I of the grey squirrel , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  J. Kaas,et al.  Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic area 3b and 1 in “SI” in the owl monkey (aotus trivirgatus) , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  L. Palmer,et al.  The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Differential thalamic relationships of sensory‐motor and parietal cortical fields in monkeys , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  L. Palmer,et al.  Retinotopic organization of areas 18 and 19 in the cat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  J. Kaas,et al.  The organization of the second somatosensory area (SmII) of the grey squirrel , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  J. Kaas,et al.  Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. , 1979, Science.

[20]  J. Kaas,et al.  Representation of the body surface in somatic koniocortex in the prosimian Galago , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.