UTILITY MODELS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISIONS: DO THEY ACCURATELY REPRESENT HUMAN PREFERENCES?*

Recent developments in multiattribute utility (MAU) theory in principle provide a formal basis for applying optimization methods to decision problems involving multiple competing objectives. In practice, MAU models and procedures are rarely applied. This paper is addressed to one major source of reluctance to employ these methods; namely, the belief that they cannot accurately reflect the structure of human preferences. This objection to MAU modeling procedures is inherently empirical. In fact, a large body of psychological research has been addressed to this question. This paper examines the relationship between formal MAU theory and the relevant psychological literature. A critical evaluation of this psychological research suggests that a variety of approaches to MAU modeling will typically yield valid mathematical representations of the preferences of individual decision makers.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  D. B. Yntema,et al.  Man-Computer Cooperation in Decisions Requiring Common Sense , 1961 .

[3]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets , 1965 .

[4]  D. B. Yntema,et al.  Telling a computer how to evaluate multidimensional situations , 1965 .

[5]  A. Tversky.  Additivity, utility, and subjective probability , 1967 .

[6]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[7]  N. Anderson.  Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. , 1970, Psychological review.

[8]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[9]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[10]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Utility Independence and Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences , 1971, Oper. Res..

[11]  T. Wallsten,et al.  Individual Decision Behavior , 1972 .

[12]  D L Patrick,et al.  Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. , 1973, Health services research.

[13]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[14]  George P. Huber,et al.  Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies , 1974 .

[15]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[16]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  How functional measurement can yield validated interval scales of mental quantities. , 1976 .

[17]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Multidimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice , 1976 .

[18]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Convergent validation of decomposed multi-attribute utility assessment procedures for risky and riskless decisions , 1977 .

[19]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Weak inference with linear models. , 1977 .

[20]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .